Normal Saline Use With Suctioning

NCT ID: NCT02612961

Last Updated: 2018-02-26

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 3 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2016-01-01
• Study Completion Date: 2016-01-16

Brief Summary

A long-standing intervention during tracheostomy tube suctioning in acute care settings is use of saline to loosen and remove respiratory tract secretions, maintain airway patency, and prevent mucus plugs. Controversy exists regarding safely using saline prior to suctioning for head and neck cancer and mechanically ventilated patients. To date, all studies had methodological limitations. In 2013, the clinical consensus statement published by AAO-HNSF identified a research gap based on lack of strong scientific evidence. A single site, randomized controlled pilot study will be conducted to evaluate effects of saline instillation with tracheostomy tube suctioning; test feasibility of proposed methods and procedures; and ensure proposed outcome variables are measurable and not confounded by extraneous variables. Institutional review board approval will be obtained before eligible adult subjects (inpatient and intensive care units) are recruited and consented. Oxygen saturation and heart rate are primary outcome variables; secondary outcome variables are mucus plugs and ventilator-associated pneumonias; other demographic data and patient characteristic variables; and outcome variables on complications and length of stay. Mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range will be calculated for continuous variables using t-tests to compare pre- and post-assessment scores. Frequencies and percentages will be calculated for categorical variables using Chi square and Fisher Exact tests to compare pre- and post-assessment scores. Multiple regression analysis will be used to control for confounding variables. This study is innovative as the first to recruit both head and neck cancer patients and mechanically ventilated patients and to measure all major outcomes of interest in one study. Understanding the effects of normal saline instillation will enable development of evidence-based guidelines and standardized protocols for tracheostomy tube suctioning.

Conditions

Tracheostomy

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Saline Instillation

3mL normal saline from pink sodium chloride bullet instilled into tracheostomy immediately prior to suctioning.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

3mL of normal saline from the pink sodium chloride bullet

Intervention Type: OTHER

Placebo

Pretend to instill 3mL of normal saline using empty pink sodium chloride bullet immediately prior to suctioning.

Group Type: SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Comparator of 3mL normal saline

Intervention Type: OTHER

Interventions

3mL of normal saline from the pink sodium chloride bullet

Intervention Type: OTHER

Sham Comparator of 3mL normal saline

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Adult Patients, ages 18 or older, cared for on adult inpatient units/wards.
• Patients who have a tracheostomy tube.
• Tracheostomy tube has been in place at lease for 72 hours (to avoid any late effects of anesthesia that was administered at the time of tracheostomy tube placement).
• Patients must have a physician order to suction the tracheostomy tube at least every 8 hours. This will help us to recruit patients for whom suctioning is already part of standard care. Therefore, patients will not undergo unnecessary suctioning for the purpose of the study.
• Expected hospitalization to be 5 days or greater after consent.

Exclusion Criteria

• Fresh tracheostomy that still has bleeding from the stoma (< 72 hours since the surgical placement of a tracheostomy tube).
• Active respiratory distress or hemodynamic changes that warrant a change in the existing treatment plan.
• Patients who are expected to die or undergo withdrawal of treatment within 48 hours.
• Patients who are allergic to latex to avoid a reaction with the red rubber suction catheter that will be used in the study.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 100 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Locations

The Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Countries

United States

References

Halm MA, Krisko-Hagel K. Instilling normal saline with suctioning: beneficial technique or potentially harmful sacred cow? Am J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;17(5):469-72. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18776003 (View on PubMed)

Paratz JD, Stockton KA. Efficacy and safety of normal saline instillation: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2009 Dec;95(4):241-50. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Sep 12.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19892088 (View on PubMed)

Dennis-Rouse MD, Davidson JE. An evidence-based evaluation of tracheostomy care practices. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008 Apr-Jun;31(2):150-60. doi: 10.1097/01.CNQ.0000314475.56754.08.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18360145 (View on PubMed)

American Association for Respiratory Care. AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways 2010. Respir Care. 2010 Jun;55(6):758-64.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20507660 (View on PubMed)

Mitchell RB, Hussey HM, Setzen G, Jacobs IN, Nussenbaum B, Dawson C, Brown CA 3rd, Brandt C, Deakins K, Hartnick C, Merati A. Clinical consensus statement: tracheostomy care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jan;148(1):6-20. doi: 10.1177/0194599812460376. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22990518 (View on PubMed)

Caruso P, Denari S, Ruiz SA, Demarzo SE, Deheinzelin D. Saline instillation before tracheal suctioning decreases the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):32-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181930026.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19050607 (View on PubMed)

Reeve JC. Instillation of normal saline before suctioning reduces the incidence of pneumonia in intubated and ventilated adults. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(2):136. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70044-3.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19534012 (View on PubMed)

Kleinpell R. Use of Normal Saline Instillation with Suctioning: The Debate Continues. Critical Care Alert 2009;17(1):1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Christensen RD, Henry E, Baer VL, Hoang N, Snow GL, Rigby G, Burnett J, Wiedmeier SE, Faix RG, Eggert LD. A low-sodium solution for airway care: results of a multicenter trial. Respir Care. 2010 Dec;55(12):1680-5.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21122176 (View on PubMed)

Maggiore SM, Lellouche F, Pignataro C, Girou E, Maitre B, Richard JC, Lemaire F, Brun-Buisson C, Brochard L. Decreasing the adverse effects of endotracheal suctioning during mechanical ventilation by changing practice. Respir Care. 2013 Oct;58(10):1588-97. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02265. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23466423 (View on PubMed)

Evans J, Syddall S, Butt W, Kinney S. Comparison of open and closed suction on safety, efficacy and nursing time in a paediatric intensive care unit. Aust Crit Care. 2014 May;27(2):70-4; quiz 75-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24636425 (View on PubMed)

Iranmanesh, Sedigheh, Rafiei, Hossein. Normal saline instillation with suctioning and its effect on oxygen saturation, heart rate, and cardiac rhythm. Int J Nurs Educ 2011;3(1):42.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Caparros AC. Mechanical ventilation and the role of saline instillation in suctioning adult intensive care unit patients: an evidence-based practice review. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2014 Jul-Aug;33(4):246-53. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000049.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24895955 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

IRB00054395

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id