Nasal Expiratory Resistance in Patients With Sleep Apnea and Expiratory Flow Limitation

NCT ID: NCT02612038

Last Updated: 2022-03-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

9 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-01

Study Completion Date

2017-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is inherently site-specific. In a physiological controlled intervention study, the investigators seek to determine whether applying expiratory resistance can acutely improve ventilation and sleep in patients with expiratory flow limitation (EFL).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Collapse of the upper airway can occur at different sites of the pharynx. One common and recognizable form of pharyngeal collapse is prolapse of the soft palate (velopharynx) on expiration, a phenomenon referred to as expiratory flow limitation (EFL). In principle, application of nasal positive expiratory pressure should reverse expiratory narrowing, increase ventilation, and prevent the subsequent progressive loss of airflow that leads to arousal from sleep, thereby improving OSA. One means to achieve this expiratory pressure is with the use of an added nasal expiratory resistance.

Accordingly, during a single night protocol, the investigators will examine the effects of increasing nasal expiratory resistance during sleep. During obstructed breathing, patients will be switched acutely, in random order, from normal conditions to an added expiratory resistance (30-80 cmH2O/L.s) or a sham resistance, for short (1 min) and prolonged periods (1 hour), repeatedly overnight.

Patients participating in the study will be divided into two groups, those exhibiting EFL versus those without EFL (i.e. with inspiratory flow limitation).

The main outcomes of the short physiologic interventions are:

* Increase in ventilation, and
* Increased time to a respiratory-related arousal from sleep, relative to sham conditions.

The main outcome of the prolonged interventions is:

--Reduced frequency of respiratory events (AHI; 3% desaturation or arousal) relative to sham conditions.

The central objective of the study is to test whether there is a greater improvement in the above outcomes in those with EFL versus those without EFL.

This data will allow us to test whether expiratory resistance is of potential therapeutic benefit specifically in patients with EFL rather than those without EFL.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Expiratory resistance

Generic expiratory resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Expiratory resistance

Intervention Type DEVICE

Generic expiratory resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit

Sham expiratory resistance

Sham resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham expiratory resistance

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham expiratory resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Expiratory resistance

Generic expiratory resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham expiratory resistance

Sham expiratory resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Expiratory positive pressure

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Presence of obstructive sleep apnea (AHI\>10/hr)

Exclusion Criteria

* Serious co-morbidities including lung disease, heart disease, renal disease
* Medications affecting respiration or sleep
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Andrew Wellman

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew Wellman, PhD MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012P000957E

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study Using Negative Pressure to Reduce Apnea
NCT04861038 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Pressure Relief Algorithm Eval
NCT06407999 WITHDRAWN NA