Nasal Expiratory Resistance in Patients With Sleep Apnea and Expiratory Flow Limitation
NCT ID: NCT02612038
Last Updated: 2022-03-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
9 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-01
2017-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Upper Airway Physical Therapy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT02109731
Effect of Myofunctional Therapy on OSA
NCT04608552
The Effects of Nasal Airflow on Upper Airway Dilator Muscles During Sleep
NCT03506178
Nasal High Flow Therapy for the Treatment of Respiratory Insufficiencies During Sleep
NCT02152566
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment With CPAP With and Without the Use of Expiratory Pressure Relief Technology
NCT05219591
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Accordingly, during a single night protocol, the investigators will examine the effects of increasing nasal expiratory resistance during sleep. During obstructed breathing, patients will be switched acutely, in random order, from normal conditions to an added expiratory resistance (30-80 cmH2O/L.s) or a sham resistance, for short (1 min) and prolonged periods (1 hour), repeatedly overnight.
Patients participating in the study will be divided into two groups, those exhibiting EFL versus those without EFL (i.e. with inspiratory flow limitation).
The main outcomes of the short physiologic interventions are:
* Increase in ventilation, and
* Increased time to a respiratory-related arousal from sleep, relative to sham conditions.
The main outcome of the prolonged interventions is:
--Reduced frequency of respiratory events (AHI; 3% desaturation or arousal) relative to sham conditions.
The central objective of the study is to test whether there is a greater improvement in the above outcomes in those with EFL versus those without EFL.
This data will allow us to test whether expiratory resistance is of potential therapeutic benefit specifically in patients with EFL rather than those without EFL.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Expiratory resistance
Generic expiratory resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit
Expiratory resistance
Generic expiratory resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit
Sham expiratory resistance
Sham resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit
Sham expiratory resistance
Sham expiratory resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Expiratory resistance
Generic expiratory resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit
Sham expiratory resistance
Sham expiratory resistance will be added to the patient's respiratory circuit
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Medications affecting respiration or sleep
21 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Andrew Wellman
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrew Wellman, PhD MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012P000957E
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.