Safety and Efficacy of Solithromycin in Adolescents and Children With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

NCT ID: NCT02605122

Last Updated: 2019-01-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

97 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2018-03-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a phase 2/3, randomized, open-label, active control, multi-center study to assess the safety and efficacy of solithromycin in children and adolescents with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects who meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria and sign the informed consent/assent were enrolled. Subjects were randomized to receive solithromycin or a comparator antibiotic, administered IV and/or by mouth (PO) based on weight and age. Subjects were treated daily for 5 to 7 days with oral solithromycin and 5 to 7 days with IV or IV-to-oral solithromycin. Subjects were treated for 5 to 10 days with comparator antibiotics. Subjects received safety and efficacy assessments during and after treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
A healthcare provider designated as a sub-investigator blinded to treatment allocation at the site documented clinical response at specified time points during the study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Solithromycin

Solithromycin will be administered orally, as capsules or as a suspension, or intravenously. Patients may receive intravenous therapy initially and switch to an oral formulation. Dosage is weight based and age based.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Solithromycin

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard of Care

Comparators will be selected according to subject age and are consistent with current recommendations for treatment of CABP in children. These include intravenous ceftriaxone, ampicillin, and amoxicillin and oral amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Azithromycin or erythromycin may be added as well.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard of Care

Intervention Type DRUG

Age- and weight-based dosing as appropriate per sites standard of care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Solithromycin

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard of Care

Age- and weight-based dosing as appropriate per sites standard of care.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CEM-101 ceftriaxone ampicillin amoxicillin amoxicillin-clavulanic acid Azithromycin Erythromycin Erythromycin lactobionate

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* History of and/or documented fever (rectal, ear, or oral temperature ≥38°C or axillary temperature ≥37.5°C) or hypothermia (rectal, ear, or oral temperature \<35°C or axillary temperature \<34.5°C)
* Chest radiograph infiltrates consistent with bacterial pneumonia (or pneumonia caused by atypical bacterial agents); if a subject is outpatient and starting on oral therapy, a radiograph is not required.
* Presence of at least 2 of the following signs or symptoms:
* Cough
* Difficulty breathing
* Production of purulent sputum
* Chest pain
* Grunting
* Hypotension
* Tachycardia, defined as follows:

2 months to \<24 months: ≥160 beats/min 24 months to \<10 years: ≥140 beats/min
* 10 years: ≥100 beats/min
* Tachypnea, defined as follows:

2 months to \<12 months: ≥50 breaths/min 12 months to \<5 years: ≥40 breaths/min
* 5 years: ≥20 breaths/min
* Physical exam consistent with pulmonary consolidation
* Presence of at least 1 of the following:
* Leukocytosis (≥12,000 white blood cells \[WBC\]/mm3)
* Leukopenia (\<5000 WBC/mm3)
* ≥10% immature neutrophils (bands) regardless of total peripheral WBC
* Elevated inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein or procalcitonin)
* Oxygen saturation \<97% on room air
* Organism consistent with a typical respiratory pathogen identified

Exclusion Criteria

* Ventilator-associated or hospital-acquired pneumonia
* \>48 hours of systemic antibacterial therapy
* confirmed or suspected bacterial meningitis
* breast-feeding females
* positive pregnancy test
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke Clinical Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Splendora, Texas, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Vratsa, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Cegléd, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Mosdós, , Hungary

Site Status

Nagykanizsa, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Törökbálint, , Hungary

Site Status

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Caloocan City, , Philippines

Site Status

Cebu City, , Philippines

Site Status

City of Muntinlupa, , Philippines

Site Status

Davao City, , Philippines

Site Status

Iloilo City, , Philippines

Site Status

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Donostia / San Sebastian, Guipuzcoa, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Bulgaria Hungary Philippines Spain United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CE01-203

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.