EMG at Performing ULTN 1 in Breast Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT02599467

Last Updated: 2015-11-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Upper limb neural mechanosensitivity is a painful disturbance that breast cancer patients often undergo following axillary surgery. It is assessed by the upper limb neurodynamic test for the median nerve, called upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1). Design: A matched case-control observational study. Objective: to check the increased upper limb mechanosensitivity by shoulder range of motion (ROM) during ULNT1 and to determine, for the first time, the evoked electromyographic (EMG) muscle activity. Participants: 62 cases who underwent breast cancer surgery and 64 matched control women. Setting: Torrejon Hospital, Physical Therapy Department, Madrid (Spain). Intervention: To record EMG muscle activity during ULNT1 performance and to measure shoulder ROM. Key outcomes: mechanosensitivity, breast cancer, pain, EMG, shoulder ROM, median nerve.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Upper limb neural mechanosensitivity is a painful disturbance that breast cancer patients often undergo following axillary surgery. It is assessed by the upper limb neurodynamic test for the median nerve, called upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1).A neural provocation test is a sequence of movements designed to assess the mechanics and physiology of part of the nervous system by elongating the length of the nerve bedding and by increasing the pressure in and around the peripheral nerve .The most reliable test to assess the upper limb neural mechanosensitivity is the neural provocation test for the median nerve, called upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1). This test consists of depressing shoulder girdle in a neutral position, shoulder abduction and lateral rotation, elbow extension, forearm supination and wrist extension. Cervical contralateral lateral flexion may be included to further increase the loading of the brachial plexus and, as a sensitizing maneuver, to differentiate structurally between neural and non-neural involvement. The ULNT1 is considered as positive when symptoms are reproduced on affected upper limb, or side-to-side differences in ROM, or symptoms modified by lateral neck side-bending. Likewise, It is also necessary to assess the EMG activity of the involved muscles to verify the early and increased protective muscle response suggested throughout the neural strain performance.

It is also necessary to assess the EMG activity of the involved muscles to verify the early and increased protective muscle response suggested throughout the neural strain performance. Design: A matched case-control observational study. Objective: to check the increased upper limb mechanosensitivity by shoulder ROM during ULNT1 and to determine, for the first time, the evoked EMG muscle activity. Participants: 62 cases who underwent breast cancer surgery and 64 matched control women. Setting: Torrejon Hospital, Physical Therapy Department, Madrid (Spain). Intervention: To record EMG muscle activity during ULNT1 performance and to measure shoulder ROM. Key outcomes: mechanosensitivity, breast cancer, pain, EMG, shoulder ROM, median nerve.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physiotherapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

case group 1: ALND

Inclusion criteria: unilateral breast cancer surgery with Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) during the last year and a half. Exclusion criteria: bilateral breast cancer, ipsilateral shoulder pathology, neuropathy.

Procedure: ULNT 1 and EMG recording.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ULNT 1 and EMG recording

Intervention Type OTHER

While the ULNT 1 was performing, EMG muscle activity form biceps brachii and triceps brachii were recorded. The maneuver was stopped to measure abduction, external rotation and elbow flexion range of motion (ROM) with a goniometer. Three measurements were performed: measure 1) when the first sense of tightness perceived by the subject appeared; measure 2) when evoked muscle activity increased on EMG record; measure 3) when sense of final resistance perceived by the investigator appeared. Considering the increase of symptoms with contralateral or decrease of symptoms with ipsilateral cervical side bending as mandatory positivity criterion.

case group 2: SLNB

Inclusion criteria: unilateral breast cancer surgery with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) during the last year and a half. Exclusion criteria: bilateral breast cancer, ipsilateral shoulder pathology, neuropathy.

Procedure: ULNT 1 and EMG recording

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ULNT 1 and EMG recording

Intervention Type OTHER

While the ULNT 1 was performing, EMG muscle activity form biceps brachii and triceps brachii were recorded. The maneuver was stopped to measure abduction, external rotation and elbow flexion range of motion (ROM) with a goniometer. Three measurements were performed: measure 1) when the first sense of tightness perceived by the subject appeared; measure 2) when evoked muscle activity increased on EMG record; measure 3) when sense of final resistance perceived by the investigator appeared. Considering the increase of symptoms with contralateral or decrease of symptoms with ipsilateral cervical side bending as mandatory positivity criterion.

control group

Matched by age and dominant arm to each case. Exclusion criteria: current painful conditions involving their neck or dominant upper-extremity, and chronic pain conditions or use of pain relievers.

Procedure: ULNT 1 and EMG recording.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ULNT 1 and EMG recording

Intervention Type OTHER

While the ULNT 1 was performing, EMG muscle activity form biceps brachii and triceps brachii were recorded. The maneuver was stopped to measure abduction, external rotation and elbow flexion range of motion (ROM) with a goniometer. Three measurements were performed: measure 1) when the first sense of tightness perceived by the subject appeared; measure 2) when evoked muscle activity increased on EMG record; measure 3) when sense of final resistance perceived by the investigator appeared. Considering the increase of symptoms with contralateral or decrease of symptoms with ipsilateral cervical side bending as mandatory positivity criterion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ULNT 1 and EMG recording

While the ULNT 1 was performing, EMG muscle activity form biceps brachii and triceps brachii were recorded. The maneuver was stopped to measure abduction, external rotation and elbow flexion range of motion (ROM) with a goniometer. Three measurements were performed: measure 1) when the first sense of tightness perceived by the subject appeared; measure 2) when evoked muscle activity increased on EMG record; measure 3) when sense of final resistance perceived by the investigator appeared. Considering the increase of symptoms with contralateral or decrease of symptoms with ipsilateral cervical side bending as mandatory positivity criterion.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* No undergo breast cancer.
* To be the age and the sema dominant arm than one of the cases.

Exclusion Criteria

* Current painful conditions involving their neck or dominant upper-extremity.
* Chronic pain conditions (i.e. Fibromyalgia).
* Current use of pain relievers.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alcala

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

IRENE DE LA ROSA DÍAZ

PhD student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

María Torres-Lacomba, Doctor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universidad Alcala

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IDLR1985

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.