Accessory Joint and Neural Mobilizations in Shoulder After Breast Cancer Surgery. Randomized Clinical Trial.

NCT ID: NCT02366793

Last Updated: 2015-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The potential consequences after breast cancer surgery are joint pain and sensitive disorders, the main sign of which is alterations in shoulder mobility. Global kinesitherapy has been shown to be effective at increasing shoulder range of motion restriction. However, literature does not consider specific manual therapy techniques, which means peripheral nerves and articular capsule have not been taken into account. These two tissues are potentially damaged structures during surgery and they are main responsible for shoulder range of motion restriction The main objective of this study is to pilot the effectiveness of accessory joint and nerve mobilization techniques in order to get an overview of the articular capsule and nerve dysfunctions involvement in shoulder motion restriction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: The potential consequences after breast cancer surgery are joint pain and sensitive disorders, the main sign of which is alterations in shoulder mobility. Design: Prospective randomized and double-blind pilot trial. Objective: To pilot the effectiveness of accessory joint and nerve mobilization techniques in order to get an overview of the joint capsule and nerve involvement in shoulder motion restriction. Participants: 18 women who were undergoing unilateral breast cancer surgery and axillary lymph node dissection. Setting: Women´s Health Research Group at Physical Therapy Department of University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain. Intervention: accessory joint mobilization versus neural mobilization. Follow-up: Six-month follow-up. Key outcomes: Range of motion, sensitive disorder, pain and upper limb functionality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Accessory joint mobilization

Humeral head slides, anterior, posterior and caudal slides.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Accessory joint mobilization

Intervention Type OTHER

Three kinds of humeral head slides: anterior, posterior and caudal slides. Subjects remained in supine position during the whole treatment. The techniques were applied in a rhythmical way, with 2 seconds of slide/traction and then a 2-second break. Each technique was carried out for 2 minutes.

Nerve mobilization

neural tissue longitudinal slide using the median neurodynamic test 1 (Butler).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nerve mobilization

Intervention Type OTHER

Neural tissue longitudinal slide using the median neurodynamic test 1 (MNT1) that was described by Butler. The proximal parameters (scapular depression, abduction and humeral external rotation) were introduced with maximum neural tension. On the other hand, the distal parameters (supination, elbow extension, wrist and fingers extension) received the remaining tension that the neural tissue allowed. The parameters were introduced sequentially in the order exposed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Accessory joint mobilization

Three kinds of humeral head slides: anterior, posterior and caudal slides. Subjects remained in supine position during the whole treatment. The techniques were applied in a rhythmical way, with 2 seconds of slide/traction and then a 2-second break. Each technique was carried out for 2 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

Nerve mobilization

Neural tissue longitudinal slide using the median neurodynamic test 1 (MNT1) that was described by Butler. The proximal parameters (scapular depression, abduction and humeral external rotation) were introduced with maximum neural tension. On the other hand, the distal parameters (supination, elbow extension, wrist and fingers extension) received the remaining tension that the neural tissue allowed. The parameters were introduced sequentially in the order exposed

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* unilateral breast cancer diagnosis
* breast cancer with axillary lymph node dissection
* be willing to sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* bilateral breast cancer diagnosis
* loco-regional recurrence
* systemic disease
* had not undergone the axillary lymph node dissection approach
* to present any contraindication for Physical Therapy.
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alcala

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

IRENE DE LA ROSA DÍAZ

Irene de la Rosa Díaz

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MARÍA TORRES-LACOMBA, DOCTOR

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

SUPERVISOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UAlcala

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.