Effects of Mepolizumab Compared to Placebo on Airway Physiology in Patients With Eosinophilic Asthma: MEMORY Study
NCT ID: NCT02594332
Last Updated: 2017-07-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
29 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-17
2017-05-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cessation Versus Continuation of Long-term Mepolizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients
NCT02555371
Effect of Mepolizumab on Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
NCT04641741
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Mepolizumab in Subjects With Severe Asthma
NCT03562195
A Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Single-Dose Intravenous Administration of MEDI-528
NCT00483041
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Effects of MEDI-563 in Adults With Asthma
NCT00659659
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The MEMORY trial is the first to primarily evaluate the effect of mepolizumab treatment on pulmonary function in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Importantly, using spirometry and bodyplethysmography will allow to evaluate additional parameters beyond FEV1 that more closely mirror the pathophysiological changes and functional aspects of airflow limitation in asthma in real life, e.g. airway resistance, hyperinflation and diffusion capacity. The proposed trial will answer the important questions: if, and if so, which parameters of airway (patho-) physiology as assessed by bodyplethysmography best reflect clinical response to mepolizumab therapy in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. In addition, the time course to clinical response will be assessed. Equally important, there is only a loose correlation between FEV1 and parameters of asthma control and asthma-related quality of life. This is why another new and important aspect of this trial is to carefully monitor asthma control and asthma quality in life in correlation with lung function changes beyond FEV1. Finally, it is tempting to speculate that the proposed trial will contribute to the question how to best define clinical response to mepolizumab.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mepolizumab
100 mg SC every 4 weeks for 13 injections
Mepolizumab
100 mg SC every 4 weeks for 13 injections
Placebo
Amount of Placebo corresponding to mepolizumab dose SC every 4 weeks for 13 injections
Placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mepolizumab
100 mg SC every 4 weeks for 13 injections
Placebo
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Male or female patients at least 18 years
3. Physician-diagnosis of asthma and evidence of asthma as documented by either reversibility of airflow obstruction (FEV1 ≥ 12% or 200 ml) demonstrated at visit 1 or visit 2 .
4. ICS dose must be ≥ 1000 μg/day BDP or equivalent daily with or without maintenance oral corticosteroids.
5. Treatment in the past 12 months with an additional controller medication for at least 3 successive months, e.g., long-acting beta-2-agonist (LABA), leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), or theophylline.
6. Persistent airflow obstruction as indicated by a pre-bronchodilator FEV1 \< 80% predicted recorded at Visit 1 or \< 90% for patients on oral corticosteroids.
7. An elevated peripheral blood eosinophil level of ≥ 300/µL that is related to asthma or ≥ 150/µL in patients treated with oral corticosteroids as maintenance therapy demonstrated at visit 1 or in the previous 12 months
8. Confirmed history of two or more exacerbations requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids (intramuscular, intravenous, or oral), in the 12 months prior to visit 1, despite the use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. For patients receiving maintenance corticosteroids, the corticosteroid treatment for the exacerbations must have been a two-fold increase or greater in the dose.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of a clinically important lung condition other than asthma. This includes current infection, bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, or diagnoses of emphysema or chronic bronchitis (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease other than asthma) or a history of lung cancer.
3. Patients who have received omalizumab \[Xolair\] within 130 days of Visit 1.
4. Patients who have received any biological to treat inflammatory disease within 5 half-lives of visit 1
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
PD Dr. Stephanie Korn
principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephanie Korn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Pneumologie
Mainz, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-001868-19
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2015-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.