A Study of MEMP1972A in Patients With Allergic Asthma Inadequately Controlled on Inhaled Steroids And A Second Controller (COSTA)

NCT ID: NCT01582503

Last Updated: 2016-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

578 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3 dosing regimens of MEMP1972A in patients with allergic asthma who remain inadequately controlled on chronic therapy with high dose inhaled corticosteroids and a second controller medication.Patients will be randomized to 4 Arms to receive subcutaneous repeating dose of either MEMP1972A 150 mg, 300 mg, or 450 mg, or placebo. Patients will continue their usual asthma medication throughout the study. Anticipated time on study treatment is 36 weeks, with a 48-week follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MEMP1972A 150 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MEMP1972A

Intervention Type DRUG

Subcutaneous repeating dose

MEMP1972A 300 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MEMP1972A

Intervention Type DRUG

Subcutaneous repeating dose

MEMP1972A 450 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MEMP1972A

Intervention Type DRUG

Subcutaneous repeating dose

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Subcutaneous repeating dose

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MEMP1972A

Subcutaneous repeating dose

Intervention Type DRUG

MEMP1972A

Subcutaneous repeating dose

Intervention Type DRUG

MEMP1972A

Subcutaneous repeating dose

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Subcutaneous repeating dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients, 18 to 75 years of age inclusive
* Body weight \>/= 40 kg
* Physician's diagnosis of asthma for at least 12 months
* Evidence of documented bronchodilator reversibility as defined by protocol
* Prebronchodilator FEV1 \>/= 40% and \</= 80% predicted at Visit 1
* Required daily use of ICS and a second controller for a minimum of 3 consecutive months prior to Visit 1
* History of at least one protocol-defined asthma exacerbation in the 18 months prior to Visit 1
* Inadequately controlled asthma despite compliance with asthma controller therapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Asthma exacerbation requiring systemic steroids in the 30 days prior to Visit 1
* Pre-existing active lung disease other than asthma
* Any infection
* Clinically significant medical disease that is uncontrolled despite treatment or is likely to require a change in therapy during study or is of unknown etiology
* Known immunodeficiency, including but not limited to HIV infection, regardless of treatment status
* Current substance abuse
* Former smoker with \>10 pack-year history or current smoker; former smokers must have stopped smoking more than 12 months prior to Visit 1
* History of anaphylaxis
* Pregnant and lactating women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Genentech, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Genentech, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Costa Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Cordova, California, United States

Site Status

Redwood City, California, United States

Site Status

Stockton, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

Centennial, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Albany, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Twin Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Normal, Illinois, United States

Site Status

River Forest, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Edison, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Teaneck, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Centerville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Mendoza, , Argentina

Site Status

Quilmes, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

Salta, , Argentina

Site Status

San Juan Bautista, , Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

Gembloux, , Belgium

Site Status

Halen, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Coswig, , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Geesthacht, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Landsberg, , Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Balassagyarmat, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Mosonmagyaróvar, , Hungary

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

México, , Mexico

Site Status

Nuevo León, , Mexico

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Aucklund, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Dunedin, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Wellington, , New Zealand

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Miraflores, , Peru

Site Status

Piura, , Peru

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Kielce, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Skierniewice, , Poland

Site Status

Tarnów, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Deva, , Romania

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

S. Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil United States Argentina Belgium Bulgaria Canada Germany Hungary Mexico New Zealand Peru Poland Romania Russia Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Harris JM, Maciuca R, Bradley MS, Cabanski CR, Scheerens H, Lim J, Cai F, Kishnani M, Liao XC, Samineni D, Zhu R, Cochran C, Soong W, Diaz JD, Perin P, Tsukayama M, Dimov D, Agache I, Kelsen SG. A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of quilizumab in adults with inadequately controlled allergic asthma. Respir Res. 2016 Mar 18;17:29. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0347-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26993628 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-003997-10

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GB27980

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id