Endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation With S-1 for Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT ID: NCT02592538
Last Updated: 2019-11-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment of Non-resectable Bile Duct Cancer with Radiofrequency Ablation or Photodynamic Therapy
NCT05551299
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography With Radiofrequency Ablation (ERCP-RFA) Combined With Envafolimab and Surufatinib Sequential Therapy for Unresectable Biliary Tract Carcinoma
NCT06656559
Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
NCT03790059
Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer and Cirrhosis
NCT00132041
Radiofrequency Ablation Accompanied With Spontaneous Sorafenib in Early to Intermediate Stage HCC
NCT02187081
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is well established method for treatment of some solid tumors, like liver cancer, lung cancer, etc. Recently, an endoscopically applicable radiofrequency probe, HabibTM EndoHBP catheter, was approved for clinical use. RFA uses a high-frequency alternating current to generate heat and achieve coagulative necrosis when in contact with tissue. Many studies showed RFA with biliary stent was a beneficial treatment option for palliation of malignant biliary strictures. However, most of therapeutic effects were expected to delay bile duct obstruction rather than to decrease the tumor. Recently orally available chemotherapeutic agent, S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, was reported as effective in patients with bile duct adenocarcinoma. To date, little is known about the role of the addition of systemic chemotherapy to RFA for cholangiocarcinoma.
The aim of this study is to conduct a randomised, controlled, clinical trial to compare the effect of S-1 plus RFA with stent with RFA with stent in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RFA+stent+S-1
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) would be performed under standard operating conditions to confirm the biliary malignancy. Patients will receive endobiliary radiofrequency ablation ( RFA) followed by plastic stent(s) placement, and be treated with S-1 began within 1 month after RFA.
radiofrequency ablation
All patients underwent biliary sphincterotomy. Cholangiogram was performed to confirm stricture location, length and diameter. The Habib Endo HPB (Hepatobiliary) probe (EMcision, HitchinHerts, UK) was then advanced over a wire at the level of the biliary stricture and ablation using ERBE generator set at 7-10 watts for a time period of 90-120 s was conducted. A 1- to 2-min resting period after energy delivery was allowed before moving the catheter along the length of the stricture to ablate the rest of the stricture.
S-1
In the RFA plus S-1 group, treatment with S-1 began within 1 month after RFA. Based on the patient's body surface area, S-1 was administered as follows: when the level of total bilirubin was less than 2 mg/dl. Based on the body surface area, S-1 was administered if \<1.25 m2, 80 mg/day; if 1.25-1.5 m2, 100 mg/day; if≥1.5 m2, 120 mg/day. S-1 was administered orally twice daily for 14 days, followed by 7 days without treatment.
Stent
Plastic stent(s) were placed after RFA depending on the location of the malignant obstruction
RFA+stent
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) would be performed under standard operating conditions to confirm the biliary malignancy. Patients will only receive endobiliary radiofrequency ablation ( RFA) followed by plastic stent(s) placement
radiofrequency ablation
All patients underwent biliary sphincterotomy. Cholangiogram was performed to confirm stricture location, length and diameter. The Habib Endo HPB (Hepatobiliary) probe (EMcision, HitchinHerts, UK) was then advanced over a wire at the level of the biliary stricture and ablation using ERBE generator set at 7-10 watts for a time period of 90-120 s was conducted. A 1- to 2-min resting period after energy delivery was allowed before moving the catheter along the length of the stricture to ablate the rest of the stricture.
Stent
Plastic stent(s) were placed after RFA depending on the location of the malignant obstruction
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
radiofrequency ablation
All patients underwent biliary sphincterotomy. Cholangiogram was performed to confirm stricture location, length and diameter. The Habib Endo HPB (Hepatobiliary) probe (EMcision, HitchinHerts, UK) was then advanced over a wire at the level of the biliary stricture and ablation using ERBE generator set at 7-10 watts for a time period of 90-120 s was conducted. A 1- to 2-min resting period after energy delivery was allowed before moving the catheter along the length of the stricture to ablate the rest of the stricture.
S-1
In the RFA plus S-1 group, treatment with S-1 began within 1 month after RFA. Based on the patient's body surface area, S-1 was administered as follows: when the level of total bilirubin was less than 2 mg/dl. Based on the body surface area, S-1 was administered if \<1.25 m2, 80 mg/day; if 1.25-1.5 m2, 100 mg/day; if≥1.5 m2, 120 mg/day. S-1 was administered orally twice daily for 14 days, followed by 7 days without treatment.
Stent
Plastic stent(s) were placed after RFA depending on the location of the malignant obstruction
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient over 18.
* Patient with histologically proved cholangiocarcinoma ; histologic diagnosis must be proved by biliary brushing, bile cytology, endobiliary biopsy under Spyglass, or by EUS-FNA.
* Patient with Karnofsky score ≥ 50 %
* Patient capable of fill in the quality of life questionnaire.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients under or already treated by radiotherapy or chemotherapy treatment for cholangiocarcinoma.
* Patients with porphyria or hypersensibility to porphyrins.
* Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women.
* Patient under 18.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jianfeng Yang
Deputy irector
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Xiaofeng Zhang, M.S
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hangzhou First People's Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Laquiere A, Boustiere C, Leblanc S, Penaranda G, Desilets E, Prat F. Safety and feasibility of endoscopic biliary radiofrequency ablation treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1242-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4322-7. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
Butros SR, Shenoy-Bhangle A, Mueller PR, Arellano RS. Radiofrequency ablation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: feasability, local tumor control, and long-term outcome. Clin Imaging. 2014 Jul-Aug;38(4):490-494. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
Strand DS, Cosgrove ND, Patrie JT, Cox DG, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Mann JA, Sauer BG, Shami VM, Wang AY. ERCP-directed radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy are associated with comparable survival in the treatment of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Nov;80(5):794-804. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.1030. Epub 2014 May 15.
Yang J, Wang J, Zhou H, Wang Y, Huang H, Jin H, Lou Q, Shah RJ, Zhang X. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus a novel oral 5-fluorouracil compound versus radiofrequency ablation alone for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Dec;92(6):1204-1212.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.075. Epub 2020 May 11.
Yang J, Wang J, Zhou H, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Jin H, Lou Q, Zhang X. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2018 Aug;50(8):751-760. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124870. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2002-001-003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.