Effects of Warmed, Humidified CO2 Insufflation on Body Core Temperature and Cytokine Response
NCT ID: NCT02586974
Last Updated: 2025-01-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-09-30
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Use of Thermal Suits as Preventing Hypothermia During Surgery
NCT01571544
Warmed Humidified Carbon Dioxide (CO2) for Open Surgery
NCT00801424
Local CO2 Increases Core and Wound Temperature
NCT01213628
Evaluation of Core Body Temperature When Using Forced Air Warming or an Active Blanket to Prevent Perioperative Hypothermia
NCT02079311
HEAT HumiGard Evaluation Study
NCT04164706
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
That said, various devices of conditioning of the insufflating gas have been investigated to reduce the specific heat losses resulting from peritoneal insufflations, as well as to evaluate the inflammatory response. Previous studies conducted on animal models and clinical settings have suggested that warmed and humidified insufflation allows for an improved maintenance of body core temperature, a reduction in the degree of inflammatory response and an improved quality of postoperative course, compared with standard insufflating gas. These findings, however, are still not conclusive as they have not been confirmed by adequate randomized, controlled trials. Furthermore, no device providing warming and humidification has demonstrated a conclusive advantage over standard cold dry gas in terms of prevention of hypothermia during laparoscopy in man.
On the basis of the current available studies favouring warmed and humidified insufflation, the investigators hypothesize that a new device providing warmed and humidified insufflation (Humigard® Fisher and Paykel Healthcare®) might achieve significant benefits over standard insufflation in terms of body core temperature maintenance. The investigators also expect to document a decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokines, as a response to a diminished peritoneal irritation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group H+WB
32 patients will receive warmed, humidified CO2 insufflation with the Humigard® device, along with the hot air warming blanket used as a routine in our institution (forced air warming blanket at 38°C : Bear Hugger®)
Humigard
warmed and humidified CO2 insufflation
Group WB
32 patients will receive standard CO2 insufflation, along with the hot air warming blanket used as a routine in our institution (forced air warming blanket at 38°C : Bear Hugger® and a standard insufflation with non-humidified, non-heated CO2)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Humigard
warmed and humidified CO2 insufflation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
40 Years
80 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCAD - EITS
UNKNOWN
A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marco Oderda
PhD fellow
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paolo Gontero, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
A.O.U. San Giovanni Battista Molinette
Torino, TO, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0052588
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.