Development of the Medicines Optimisation Assessment Tool
NCT ID: NCT02582463
Last Updated: 2018-03-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1552 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-04-30
2018-03-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
General Practitioner (GP) Practice Based Pharmacist Input to Medicines Optimisation
NCT03241498
Optimising Pharmacist-led Medication Reviews in Primary Care
NCT05928104
A Randomised Pilot Study of the REVISiT Intervention
NCT04586595
Prioritising Patient Medication Review: Hospitals Reaching Out
NCT06451692
Process Evaluation of OptimiseRx and PINCER
NCT04766619
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The MOAT will be developed following recommendations of the PROGnosis RESearch Strategy (PROGRESS) partnership. A prospective cohort study of 1,500 patients will be used to develop the MOAT from the medical wards of two UK hospitals. Data will be collected on prognostic factors (selected based on a review of published literature and expert opinion) for each patient, together with details of MRPs that occur. All MRPs will be reviewed by an expert panel who will grade for severity and preventability using recognised criteria. Multivariable logistic regression models will be used to determine the relationship between potential risk factors such as polypharmacy, renal impairment, and the use of 'high risk' medicines, and the study outcome of preventable medication related problems that are at least moderate in severity. Bootstrapping will be used to adjust the MOAT for optimism, and predictive performance will be assessed using calibration and discrimination. A simplified scoring system will also be developed, which will be assessed for sensitivity and specificity.
The intention of this research is to develop a prediction-tool (the MOAT), which has the potential to be adopted widely into clinical practice. If the initial research is successful in producing a prediction-tool with good predictive performance further research will be carried out to assess how feasible it would be to use the MOAT in practice, the potential efficiency savings, and an assessment of clinical risk to patients through use of the MOAT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* subject not prescribed medication
* subject both admitted and subsequently discharged outside of core pharmacy working hours
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
OTHER_GOV
University College, London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cathy Geeson
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University College, London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Luton and Dunstable University Hospital
Luton, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Geeson C, Wei L, Franklin BD. Medicines Optimisation Assessment Tool (MOAT): a prognostic model to target hospital pharmacists' input to improve patient outcomes. Protocol for an observational study. BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 14;7(6):e017509. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017509.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDRF-2014-05-033
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
15/0525
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.