Effects of Low-dose Ketamine as an Adjunct to Propofol-based Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy
NCT ID: NCT02579642
Last Updated: 2021-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-31
2019-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Current research focusing on ketamine with respect to its anti-depressant effect suggests it may even represent an alternative to ECT. This study will seek to determine whether ketamine when used in low-doses as an adjunct to propofol-based anesthesia for ECT has anti-depressant effects and whether it influences the characteristics of recovery from anesthesia in the ECT setting (i.e. vital sign parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate, quality of recovery, etc.).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ketamine Anesthesia for Improvement of Depression in ECT
NCT02752724
Ketamine Versus Electroconvulsive Therapy in Depression
NCT03674671
Comparing Ketamine and Propofol Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy
NCT01935115
Ketamine Co-induction for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
NCT03666494
An EEG Study of Intravenous Ketamine for Major Depression Disorder
NCT05506462
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Since thiopental is no longer widely available in North America as an induction agent for anesthesia, other agents have supplanted it for various uses, including for induction of anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Induction is most commonly achieved using propofol in doses of 0.75 - 1 mg/kg IV bolus.
Propofol as an induction agent for ECT may not be the ideal agent in this setting as its anticonvulsant effects may result in less-than-ideal seizure quality and duration. Ketamine has been studied in the ECT setting but at full induction doses has well-known psychotomimetic and dissociative effects. However, the anti-depressant effects of ketamine, even at low-doses, may have a beneficial effect on depressive symptoms after ECT as compared with propofol alone.
Ketamine also has been used successfully as the sole induction agent for anesthesia in this setting, and has more recently been studied as an adjunct or co-induction agent in combination with propofol. Drawbacks of using ketamine as the sole induction agent are related to its hemodynamic and psychotomimetic effects (e.g. post-treatment hypertension and hallucinogenic activity).
New literature postulates a putative anti-depressant effect of ketamine via the N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, which in the ECT setting specifically may be helpful with regards to the overall goals of therapy (i.e. ECT indicated for severe or treatment-resistant depression). Current research focusing on the efficacy of ketamine with respect to anti-depressant effects suggests that ketamine may even represent an alternative to ECT.
As per the investigators' standard practice for ECT, treatment for each patient would be 3 times per week up to a total of 12 treatments (i.e. 4 weeks of treatment). The total study duration for each patient will be not more than 6 weeks. As discussed below, patients will be withdrawn from the study at anytime upon their own request or when the treating psychiatrist feels the clinical improvement is strong enough to justify doing so.
An interim analysis will be completed after the first 14 patients have completed treatment. If after these first 14 patients the investigators find a lower than expected difference in efficacy in favor of the ketamine group, able to achieve alpha error \>0.2 and power \<80%, all subsequently recruited patients will be randomized to receive either propofol at usual induction doses for ECT (0.75 - 1 mg/kg IV bolus) with placebo (normal saline), or with a slightly higher dose of ketamine of 0.5 mg/kg. Should this turn out to be the case, thirty new patients will be recruited from that point.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
Propofol at usual induction doses for ECT (0.75 - 1 mg/kg IV bolus) with placebo (normal saline)
Placebo
Normal saline administered with usual induction drugs for ECT
Ketamine
Propofol at usual induction doses for ECT (0.75 - 1 mg/kg IV bolus) with the addition of low-dose ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (or 0.5 mg/kg - see interim analysis)
Ketamine
Low dose ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (or 0.5 mg/kg depending on results of interim analysis) administered with usual induction drugs for ECT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ketamine
Low dose ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (or 0.5 mg/kg depending on results of interim analysis) administered with usual induction drugs for ECT
Placebo
Normal saline administered with usual induction drugs for ECT
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* considered American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Class I - III
* baseline MADRS score greater than 24 (i.e. at least moderate to severe depression)
* a "first" or "new" episode of depression which has lasted not more than 3 months and requires ECT treatment as judged by a psychiatrist
Exclusion Criteria
* Any ECT treatment in the previous three months
* Inability or refusal to provide informed consent
* A history of allergic reactions, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to anesthetics or their constituents used in the study (ketamine, propofol, egg phosphatide, soybean oil)
* Anyone taking medications considered contraindicated for ECT or for general anesthesia
* Presence of any of the following DSM-IV diagnoses: Substance or alcohol dependence at enrolment (except dependence in full remission, and except for caffeine or nicotine dependence), abuse of opiates, amphetamines, barbiturates, cocaine, cannabis, or hallucinogen abuse in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment, pervasive developmental disorder, dementia
* Significant medical condition that would contraindicate the use of ketamine, propofol or that is untreated and would need urgent attention (as determined by treating physician)
* Medical conditions that would significantly affect absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of ketamine or propofol
* Unstable or inadequately treated medical illness (e.g. congestive heart failure, angina pectoris, hypertension) as judged by the investigator
* Patients with increased risk of laryngospasm (such as active pulmonary infection, upper respiratory infection, asthma), increased intracranial pressure, glaucoma, thyroid disease/hyperthyroidism
* Any clinically significant deviation from the reference range in clinical laboratory test results as judged by the investigator
* Pregnancy (or female of child-bearing age not using adequate contraception) or lactation
* Participation in another drug trial within 4 weeks prior enrolment into this study or longer in accordance with local requirements
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alberta Health services
OTHER
University of Alberta
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ferrante Gragasin
Associate Clinical Professor and Postgraduate Research Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ferrante S Gragasin, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alberta
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alberta Hospital Edmonton
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Okamoto N, Nakai T, Sakamoto K, Nagafusa Y, Higuchi T, Nishikawa T. Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia. J ECT. 2010 Sep;26(3):223-7. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181c3b0aa.
Wang X, Chen Y, Zhou X, Liu F, Zhang T, Zhang C. Effects of propofol and ketamine as combined anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy in patients with depressive disorder. J ECT. 2012 Jun;28(2):128-32. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31824d1d02.
Larkin GL, Beautrais AL. A preliminary naturalistic study of low-dose ketamine for depression and suicide ideation in the emergency department. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Sep;14(8):1127-31. doi: 10.1017/S1461145711000629. Epub 2011 May 5.
Murrough JW, Iosifescu DV, Chang LC, Al Jurdi RK, Green CE, Perez AM, Iqbal S, Pillemer S, Foulkes A, Shah A, Charney DS, Mathew SJ. Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;170(10):1134-42. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13030392.
Woolsey AJ, Nanji JA, Moreau C, Sivapalan S, Bourque SL, Ceccherini-Nelli A, Gragasin FS. Low-dose ketamine does not improve the speed of recovery from depression in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan-Feb;44(1):6-14. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1705.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO00044771
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.