Satisfaction With Multifocal vs Accommodating Lens Implants 2 Years After Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02578524

Last Updated: 2015-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

117 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will examine patient satisfaction and spectacle independence using a survey in patients who have undergone uncomplicated cataract surgery with a presbyopia-correcting lens at least 2 years prior to administration of the survey.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Purpose: To compare patient-reported satisfaction with a multifocal vs an accommodating presbyopia-correcting at least two years following implantation of either type of implant.

Number of study subjects: 200 (half with multifocal and half with accommodating lens implants)

In this study, we will send a secure, online questionnaire to patients who have previously undergone cataract surgery at least two years previously. Patients will receive an email invitation, and by clicking the embedded link and verifying their identity with date of birth and phone number, they will be directed to a survey. The survey will ask the following types of questions:

* overall satisfaction with the surgery
* would they do the same surgery again?
* would they choose the same (elective) lens implant again?
* for what types of activities (reading newspaper, driving, driving at night, fine print) do they require glasses to see clearly?
* do they experience glare and halo symptoms?
* how bothered is the patient by these symptoms?

These data will be stored on a secure server. Statistical analysis will be done by a statistician, using a student's t-test to determine statistical significance of any difference between patients with different types of lens implants.

No intervention will be planned with patients, other than analyzing the survey results. All patient identifying (demographic) information will be carefully protected according to HIPAA and HITECH standards.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cataract

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Accommodating Lenses

Patients who underwent surgery with an accommodating lens implant.

Survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Multifocal Lenses

Patients who underwent surgery with an multifocal lens implant.

Survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with uncomplicated bilateral cataract surgery with either multifocal or accommodating lens implants performed at least 24 months previously

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with visually significant co-morbidities (corneal, retina, optic nerve disease) that, in the best judgment of the investigator, could affect their satisfaction with surgery
* Patients with surgical complications either during or after surgery (capsule tears, iris trauma, decentered IOL, cystoid macular edema, etc.)
* Patients with ≥ grade 1 posterior capsule opacity at their last visit
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MDbackline, LLC

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Hovanesian, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MDbackline, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Harvard Eye Associates

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BAU141212

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.