An Efficacy and Safety Study of Atabecestat in Participants Who Are Asymptomatic at Risk for Developing Alzheimer's Dementia

NCT ID: NCT02569398

Last Updated: 2025-04-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

557 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-29

Study Completion Date

2018-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether treatment with atabecestat slows cognitive decline compared with placebo treatment, as measured by a composite cognitive measure, the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC), in amyloid-positive participants who are asymptomatic at risk for developing Alzheimer's dementia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the researchers nor the participants know what treatment the participant is receiving), multi-center (more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in participants who are asymptomatic and at risk for developing Alzheimer's dementia. The study will consist of a Screening Phase (approximately 90 days), treatment Phase (54 months) and follow-up Phase (7 to 28 days). In treatment Phase eligible Participants will be randomized to receive study drug or placebo once daily for up to 4.5 years. The maximum study duration for a participant will be 58 months. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asymptomatic Amyloid-positive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Participants will receive one atabecestat, 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Atabecestat, 5 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

One atabecestat, 5 mg tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Group 2

Participants will receive one atabecestat, 25 mg tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Atabecestat, 25 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

One atabecestat, 25 mg tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Group 3

Participants will receive one matching placebo tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

One matching placebo tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Atabecestat, 5 mg

One atabecestat, 5 mg tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Atabecestat, 25 mg

One atabecestat, 25 mg tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

One matching placebo tablet orally once daily up to 54 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participant must have a global Clinical Dementia Rating Scale- (CDR) score of '0' at Screening
* Participants 60 to 64 years of age must also have 1 of the following 3 conditions: a) a positive family history for dementia (minimum of 1 first degree relative), b) a previously known apolipoprotein E, ε4 allele (APOE ɛ4) genotype, c) a previously known biomarker status demonstrating elevated amyloid accumulation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or positron emission tomography (PET)
* Participant must be able to read and write and must have adequate hearing and visual acuity to complete the psychometric tests. The legally acceptable representative must also be able to read and write
* Participants must have evidence of amyloid accumulation by means of either: a) low Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) ABeta 1-42 levels at Screening; b) a positive amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan at Screening (depending on the site's PET capability) by visual read
* Participant must be otherwise healthy for their age group or medically stable with or without medication on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) performed at Screening or at Baseline

Exclusion Criteria

* Participant is receiving an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor and/or memantine at any time during Screening or Day 1 predose
* Participant has evidence of any brain diseases, other than potential very early signs of Alzheimer's Dementia (AD) (example. mild hippocampal atrophy) or typical age-related changes (e.g. mild white matter hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) or any other abnormality (e.g. folic acid/Vitamin B12 deficiency) that could explain a possible cognitive deficit (including, but not limited to vascular encephalopathy or large strokes (as imaged by cerebral MRI)
* Participant has any contraindications for MRI (example, prostheses, implants, claustrophobia, pacemaker)
* Participant has met criteria for dementia or has a brain disorder that can cause dementia
* Participant has evidence of familial autosomal dominant AD (mutation identified in the family and/or participant prior to randomization)
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sun City, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Downey, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Delray Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lake Worth, Florida, United States

Site Status

Melbourne, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocoee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

The Villages, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Elkhart, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Westwood, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bangor, Maine, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Amherst, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Orangeburg, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cordova, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Darlinghurst, , Australia

Site Status

East Gosford, , Australia

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Australia

Site Status

Herston, , Australia

Site Status

Subiaco, , Australia

Site Status

Tarren Point, , Australia

Site Status

Waratah, , Australia

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Baudour, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Mons, , Belgium

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Gatineau, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Ballerup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

København Ø, , Denmark

Site Status

Rødovre Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Homburg, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Mittweida, , Germany

Site Status

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Chiba, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Hachioji-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Iizuka-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Shibuya-ku, , Japan

Site Status

Shinjuku-ku, , Japan

Site Status

Shirakawa, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status

Tlalnepantla, , Mexico

Site Status

's-Hertogenbosch, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Breda, , Netherlands

Site Status

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Donostia / San Sebastian, , Spain

Site Status

Getxo, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Manresa, , Spain

Site Status

Terrassa, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Mölndal, , Sweden

Site Status

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Guildford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Swindon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada Denmark Finland Germany Japan Mexico Netherlands Spain Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sperling R, Henley D, Aisen PS, Raman R, Donohue MC, Ernstrom K, Rafii MS, Streffer J, Shi Y, Karcher K, Raghavan N, Tymofyeyev Y, Bogert J, Brashear HR, Novak G, Thipphawong J, Saad ZS, Kolb H, Rofael H, Sanga P, Romano G. Findings of Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Outcomes of Atabecestat in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Truncated Randomized Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2021 Mar 1;78(3):293-301. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4857.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33464300 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-000948-42

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

54861911ALZ2003

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR107373

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.