A Novel Method for Capturing the Visual Evoked Potential During Spine Surgery Under Total Intravenous Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT02563028

Last Updated: 2022-05-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spine surgery in the prone position (which involves lying face down) is associated with various visual changes, ranging from temporary changes in acuity (or sharpness) to permanent blindness. Known risk factors include low blood count (anemia) and long surgical times in the prone position under general anesthesia. While blindness is a rare outcome of this surgery, it is devastating and incompletely prevented by controlling known risk factors. Thus, improved monitoring and detection of visual injury during surgery is necessary. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a novel, non-invasive monitoring device can reliably record visual responses during spine surgery. The first phase of this study is completed and involved patients undergoing microdiscectomy surgery. The second phase of this study involves patients undergoing single-level lumbar spine decompression/fusion surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Spine surgery is associated with a variety of post-operative visual complications, ranging from mild, transient deficits in acuity to full visual loss. Known risk factors for visual loss include anemia, hypotension, and long surgical times in the prone position under general anesthesia. Despite recognition and control of risk factors, the prevalence of visual loss after prone spine surgery is estimated at approximately 0.1-1% . The pathophysiology of visual loss most often reflects posterior ischemic optic neuropathy, but anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome have also been described.

These reports suggest that the entire pathway from retina to visual cortex is vulnerable to injuries causing post-operative visual deficits. The potential for severe injury during spine surgery mandates improved detection of evolving optic tract injury during prone spine surgery.

Theoretically, the flash visual evoked potential (VEP) represents a useful intraoperative tool to monitor global visual system function. However, its application to spine surgery has been limited due to challenges in acquiring and interpreting signals intraoperatively. Several devices for intraoperative VEP-recording have been described . However, most of these have been trialed with patients in the supine or beach chair position, undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Goggle or eyepatch-designed devices have the potential to move during surgery, changing the relationship between the goggle and globe. The goggle itself may potentially compress the globe, producing inconsistent illumination to the retina or causing mechanical injury. These are particular liabilities during changes in position from supine to prone, as is required for many spine surgeries. Additionally, VEPs are extremely variable and exquisitely sensitive to anesthetics- particularly inhaled agents. Consistent with this, intravenous (rather than inhaled) agents have been associated with successful intraoperative VEP monitoring patients, particularly in patients without baseline visual impairment. Nonetheless, there are multiple reports in the literature showing poor correlation/prediction of postoperative visual status by intraoperative VEP measurements. A novel technology for capturing VEPs has recently been developed and may address several of the liabilities described above. The device is constructed from soft foam padding in a "ski mask" design, which we hypothesize may add a measure of protection to the eyes compared to traditional VEP goggles or patches. This design may also provide stability during changes in patient positioning from supine to prone. The front of the mask consists of an opaque circuit board with six bright light emitting diodes positioned in front of each eye, allowing illumination of the retina through closed, protected eyes. Opaque foam separates right and left sides of the mask, allowing each eye to be stimulated individually. To date, the mask has not been tested for sensitivity to elicit and record VEPs in patients under anesthesia. In this pilot study, we tested the feasibility of using the mask during prone spine surgery. Specifically, we asked if VEPs can be detected throughout spine surgeries of varying complexity and duration, whether the signals change with changes in patient positioning and anesthetic conditions, and whether the mask was associated with any adverse effects. Here we show that intraoperative VEPs can be recorded throughout spine surgery using this device. We also describe effects of several anesthetic agents on VEP stability, and ask if there is any qualitative relationship between changes in VEPs and SSEPs recorded simultaneously.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Evoked Potentials, Visual

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SightSaver Visual Stimulator

A SightSaver Visual Stimulator mask will be applied during surgery. Baseline VEPs will be recorded prior to prone positioning. At the end of surgery, after supine positioning, the SightSaver Visual Stimulator mask will be removed and discarded.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SightSaver Visual Stimulator

Intervention Type DEVICE

Evoked response photic stimulator

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SightSaver Visual Stimulator

Evoked response photic stimulator

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any patient presenting for single-level microdiscectomy (first phase only)
* Any patient presenting for single-level lumbar spine decompression/fusion (second phase only)
* Any patient suitable for total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA)
* Age \>18

Exclusion Criteria

* Neurologic or demyelinating disease expected to be associated with impaired VEPs
* Eye disease, including blindness, glaucoma, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, or conditions expected to be associated with impaired VEPs
* Patients with a known history of seizures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Beckman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital for Special Surgery

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Soffin EM, Emerson RG, Cheng J, Mercado K, Smith K, Beckman JD. A pilot study to record visual evoked potentials during prone spine surgery using the SightSaver photic visual stimulator. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Oct;32(5):889-895. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0092-1. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29264762 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-272

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.