A Novel Method for Capturing the Visual Evoked Potential During Spine Surgery Under Total Intravenous Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT02563028
Last Updated: 2022-05-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-31
2016-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Spinal Neurorehabilitation for Veterans With SCI
NCT07222046
Spine Surgery Video Observation Study. The Creation of a Benchmark Video (RGB-Depth) Dataset to Investigate the Feasibility of Developing a Markerless Tracking System for Spine Surgery.
NCT06580379
Predicting Pain Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Phantom Limb Pain in Limb Amputees
NCT02627495
Evaluating Safety and Feasibility of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Following Traumatic and Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study
NCT06520020
A Novel Combined Neuromodulation Therapy to Enhance Balance and Neuroplasticity
NCT05940636
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
These reports suggest that the entire pathway from retina to visual cortex is vulnerable to injuries causing post-operative visual deficits. The potential for severe injury during spine surgery mandates improved detection of evolving optic tract injury during prone spine surgery.
Theoretically, the flash visual evoked potential (VEP) represents a useful intraoperative tool to monitor global visual system function. However, its application to spine surgery has been limited due to challenges in acquiring and interpreting signals intraoperatively. Several devices for intraoperative VEP-recording have been described . However, most of these have been trialed with patients in the supine or beach chair position, undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Goggle or eyepatch-designed devices have the potential to move during surgery, changing the relationship between the goggle and globe. The goggle itself may potentially compress the globe, producing inconsistent illumination to the retina or causing mechanical injury. These are particular liabilities during changes in position from supine to prone, as is required for many spine surgeries. Additionally, VEPs are extremely variable and exquisitely sensitive to anesthetics- particularly inhaled agents. Consistent with this, intravenous (rather than inhaled) agents have been associated with successful intraoperative VEP monitoring patients, particularly in patients without baseline visual impairment. Nonetheless, there are multiple reports in the literature showing poor correlation/prediction of postoperative visual status by intraoperative VEP measurements. A novel technology for capturing VEPs has recently been developed and may address several of the liabilities described above. The device is constructed from soft foam padding in a "ski mask" design, which we hypothesize may add a measure of protection to the eyes compared to traditional VEP goggles or patches. This design may also provide stability during changes in patient positioning from supine to prone. The front of the mask consists of an opaque circuit board with six bright light emitting diodes positioned in front of each eye, allowing illumination of the retina through closed, protected eyes. Opaque foam separates right and left sides of the mask, allowing each eye to be stimulated individually. To date, the mask has not been tested for sensitivity to elicit and record VEPs in patients under anesthesia. In this pilot study, we tested the feasibility of using the mask during prone spine surgery. Specifically, we asked if VEPs can be detected throughout spine surgeries of varying complexity and duration, whether the signals change with changes in patient positioning and anesthetic conditions, and whether the mask was associated with any adverse effects. Here we show that intraoperative VEPs can be recorded throughout spine surgery using this device. We also describe effects of several anesthetic agents on VEP stability, and ask if there is any qualitative relationship between changes in VEPs and SSEPs recorded simultaneously.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SightSaver Visual Stimulator
A SightSaver Visual Stimulator mask will be applied during surgery. Baseline VEPs will be recorded prior to prone positioning. At the end of surgery, after supine positioning, the SightSaver Visual Stimulator mask will be removed and discarded.
SightSaver Visual Stimulator
Evoked response photic stimulator
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SightSaver Visual Stimulator
Evoked response photic stimulator
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Any patient presenting for single-level lumbar spine decompression/fusion (second phase only)
* Any patient suitable for total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA)
* Age \>18
Exclusion Criteria
* Eye disease, including blindness, glaucoma, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, or conditions expected to be associated with impaired VEPs
* Patients with a known history of seizures
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James Beckman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Soffin EM, Emerson RG, Cheng J, Mercado K, Smith K, Beckman JD. A pilot study to record visual evoked potentials during prone spine surgery using the SightSaver photic visual stimulator. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Oct;32(5):889-895. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0092-1. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-272
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.