Ketamine for Treatment Resistant Late-Life Depression

NCT ID: NCT02556606

Last Updated: 2022-01-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-01

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a single infusion of ketamine (KET), to determine which dose is optimal 7 days after infusion using Bayesian Adaptive Randomization, and to learn about how ketamine works in the body and brain in persons with late-life treatment resistant depression.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Aim: To identify the best performing condition across a single intravenous infusion of ketamine (KET) 0.1 mg/kg, KET 0.25 mg/kg, KET 0.50 mg/kg) and midazolam (MID) 0.03 mg/kg on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) treatment response (at least a 50% improvement in depression from baseline) 7 days after the infusion in up to 72 Veterans with Late-Life Treatment Resistant Depression (LL-TRD) , using a triple blind (patient, rater, anesthesiologist) Bayesian adaptive randomization design.

Hypothesis 1: Single KET 0.5 mg/kg infusion is superior to KET 0.1 mg/kg, KET 0.25 mg/kg, and MID 0.03 mg/kg measured by the proportion of participants demonstrating \> 50% reduction on MADRS scores 7 days post-treatment.

Secondary Aim: To evaluate the durability of day 7 treatment response across 3 sub-anesthetic doses of a single KET (0.1 mg/kg, 0.25 mg/kg, and 0.50 mg/kg) and MID (0.03 mg/kg) infusion in veterans with LL-TRD during a 4 week follow-up.

Hypothesis 2: a single KET 0.5 mg/kg infusion will be superior to a single infusion of KET 0.1 mg/kg, KET 0.25 mg/kg, and MID 0.03 mg/kg as measured by the proportion of participants demonstrating \> 50% reduction on MADRS scores at 28 days post-infusion.

Tertiary Aim: To evaluate the immediate and longer-term safety and tolerability of the most effective KET infusion relative to MID in vets with LL-TRD.

Hypothesis 3: KET infusion at the most effective dose will be safe and well tolerated compared to MID, as assessed by psychoactive and general side effect rating scales during and up to 4 weeks post study infusion.

Exploratory Aims:

1. To measure the effects of the most effective dose of KET relative to MID on neurocognitive performance.
2. To measure the effects the most effective dose of KET relative to MID on peripheral biomarkers of cellular plasticity and inflammation.
3. To measure the effects the most effective dose of KET relative to MID on resting-state quantitative electroencephalography.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Treatment Resistant Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

We use a Bayesian, adaptive, randomized design initially allocating subjects to 2 arms in a 1:3 ratio: ARM 1: MID 0.03 mg/kg (active placebo); ARM 2: four conditions KET 0.1 mg/kg, KET 0.25 mg/kg, KET 0.5 mg/kg or MID 0.03 mg/kg. After 1:1:1:1 allocation of the first 20 subjects to ARM 2, Bayesian adaptive randomization may stop for superiority, change randomization ratios and/or prune arms for futility based on the probability of a day 7 treatment response. ARM 1 remains open for allocation to ensure a placebo group sufficiently large for comparison with best dose KET. For analyses, MID of ARM 1 and ARM 2 will be combined so that there are 4 conditions (or arms) for final statistical analyses. We expected to enroll a maximum 72 patients.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ketamine 0.10 mg/kg

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.1mg/Kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.1mg/Kg

Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.25mg/Kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.25mg/Kg

Ketamine 0.50 mg/kg

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.50mg/Kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.50mg/Kg

Midazolam 0.03 mg/kg

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either MID 0.03mg/Kg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

single 40 min infusion of MID 0.03mg/Kg

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ketamine

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.1mg/Kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Ketamine

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.25mg/Kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Ketamine

randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.50mg/Kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam

single 40 min infusion of MID 0.03mg/Kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female patients, 55 years of age,
* Participants must fulfill DSM 5 criteria for a Major Depressive Episode (Unipolar), based on a structured diagnostic interview, the DSM 5 M.I.N.I. 7.0
* Participants must have a history of at least one previous episode of depression prior to the current episode (recurrent MDD) or have chronic MDD (of at least two years' duration),
* Participants have not responded to two or more adequate trials of FDA-approved antidepressants, determined by Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ) criteria.
* Participants must score 14 or greater on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR), and score 27 on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS),
* Each participant must have a level of understanding sufficient to agree to all tests and examinations required by the protocol and must sign an informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients currently on fluoxetine,
* History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or any psychotic disorder, or bipolar disorder,
* Documented history of a psychotic disorder in a first-degree relative,
* Current diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or eating disorder \[bulimia nervosa or anorexia nervosa\],
* Alcohol or substance use \[except nicotine\] within the preceding 6 months,
* Patients with any clinically significant personality disorder that would, in the investigator's judgment, preclude safe study participation,
* Patients judged to be at serious and imminent suicidal or homicidal risk,
* Serious, unstable medical illnesses including respiratory \[obstructive sleep apnea, or history of difficulty with airway management during previous anesthetics\], cardiovascular \[including ischemic heart disease and uncontrolled hypertension\], and neurologic \[including history of severe head injury\],
* For study entry, patients must be reasonable medical candidates for ketamine or midazolam infusion, as determined by a board-certified physician co-investigator during study Screening,
* Clinically significant abnormal findings of laboratory parameters \[including urine toxicology screen for drugs of abuse\], physical examination, or ECG,
* Hypertension (systolic BP \>160 mm Hg or diastolic BP \>90 mm Hg),
* Patients with one or more 11 seizures without a clear and resolved etiology,
* Patients starting hormonal treatment (e.g., estrogen) in the 3 months prior to Screening,
* Past intolerance or hypersensitivity to ketamine, or history of recreational use of phencyclidine (PCP) or ketamine,
* Past intolerance or hypersensitivity to midazolam,
* Age-related cognitive decline or mild dementia suggested by a score of \< 25 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at Screening,
* Patients taking medications with known activity at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) or AMPA glutamate receptor \[e.g., riluzole, amantadine, lamotrigine, memantine, topiramate, dextromethorphan, D-cycloserine\], or the muopioid receptor,
* Patients taking any of the following medications: St John's Wort, theophylline, tramadol, metrizamide,
* Patients who demonstrate \> 25% decrease in depressive symptoms as reflected by the QIDS-SR score from Screening to Randomization,
* Patients who have received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the past 6 months prior to Screening,
* Patients currently receiving treatment with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS).
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sanjay Mathew, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Murphy N, Lijffijt M, Ramakrishnan N, Vo-Le B, Vo-Le B, Iqbal S, Iqbal T, O'Brien B, Smith MA, Swann AC, Mathew SJ. Does mismatch negativity have utility for NMDA receptor drug development in depression? Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan-Feb;44(1):61-73. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1685.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33825765 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLNA-001-14F

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Action of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression
NCT01945047 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Ketamine for Major Depressive Disorder
NCT03721900 UNKNOWN PHASE1
Ketamine in the Treatment of Depression
NCT01558063 COMPLETED PHASE2
Repeated Neurocognitive Measurements in Depressed Patients
NCT05991232 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2