Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
33 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-01
2020-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Repeated Ketamine Infusions for Treatment-resistant Depression
NCT02360280
Clinical Trial of the Use of Ketamine in Treatment Resistant Depression
NCT02610712
The UTHealth Ketamine Project
NCT02882711
Predictors of Intravenous Ketamine Response in TRD
NCT05625555
Ketamine Infusion for Treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder
NCT01582945
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis 1: Single KET 0.5 mg/kg infusion is superior to KET 0.1 mg/kg, KET 0.25 mg/kg, and MID 0.03 mg/kg measured by the proportion of participants demonstrating \> 50% reduction on MADRS scores 7 days post-treatment.
Secondary Aim: To evaluate the durability of day 7 treatment response across 3 sub-anesthetic doses of a single KET (0.1 mg/kg, 0.25 mg/kg, and 0.50 mg/kg) and MID (0.03 mg/kg) infusion in veterans with LL-TRD during a 4 week follow-up.
Hypothesis 2: a single KET 0.5 mg/kg infusion will be superior to a single infusion of KET 0.1 mg/kg, KET 0.25 mg/kg, and MID 0.03 mg/kg as measured by the proportion of participants demonstrating \> 50% reduction on MADRS scores at 28 days post-infusion.
Tertiary Aim: To evaluate the immediate and longer-term safety and tolerability of the most effective KET infusion relative to MID in vets with LL-TRD.
Hypothesis 3: KET infusion at the most effective dose will be safe and well tolerated compared to MID, as assessed by psychoactive and general side effect rating scales during and up to 4 weeks post study infusion.
Exploratory Aims:
1. To measure the effects of the most effective dose of KET relative to MID on neurocognitive performance.
2. To measure the effects the most effective dose of KET relative to MID on peripheral biomarkers of cellular plasticity and inflammation.
3. To measure the effects the most effective dose of KET relative to MID on resting-state quantitative electroencephalography.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ketamine 0.10 mg/kg
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.1mg/Kg
Ketamine
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.1mg/Kg
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.25mg/Kg
Ketamine
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.25mg/Kg
Ketamine 0.50 mg/kg
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.50mg/Kg
Ketamine
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.50mg/Kg
Midazolam 0.03 mg/kg
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either MID 0.03mg/Kg
Midazolam
single 40 min infusion of MID 0.03mg/Kg
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ketamine
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.1mg/Kg
Ketamine
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.25mg/Kg
Ketamine
randomly assigned to a single 40 min infusion of either KET 0.50mg/Kg
Midazolam
single 40 min infusion of MID 0.03mg/Kg
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants must fulfill DSM 5 criteria for a Major Depressive Episode (Unipolar), based on a structured diagnostic interview, the DSM 5 M.I.N.I. 7.0
* Participants must have a history of at least one previous episode of depression prior to the current episode (recurrent MDD) or have chronic MDD (of at least two years' duration),
* Participants have not responded to two or more adequate trials of FDA-approved antidepressants, determined by Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ) criteria.
* Participants must score 14 or greater on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR), and score 27 on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS),
* Each participant must have a level of understanding sufficient to agree to all tests and examinations required by the protocol and must sign an informed consent document.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or any psychotic disorder, or bipolar disorder,
* Documented history of a psychotic disorder in a first-degree relative,
* Current diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or eating disorder \[bulimia nervosa or anorexia nervosa\],
* Alcohol or substance use \[except nicotine\] within the preceding 6 months,
* Patients with any clinically significant personality disorder that would, in the investigator's judgment, preclude safe study participation,
* Patients judged to be at serious and imminent suicidal or homicidal risk,
* Serious, unstable medical illnesses including respiratory \[obstructive sleep apnea, or history of difficulty with airway management during previous anesthetics\], cardiovascular \[including ischemic heart disease and uncontrolled hypertension\], and neurologic \[including history of severe head injury\],
* For study entry, patients must be reasonable medical candidates for ketamine or midazolam infusion, as determined by a board-certified physician co-investigator during study Screening,
* Clinically significant abnormal findings of laboratory parameters \[including urine toxicology screen for drugs of abuse\], physical examination, or ECG,
* Hypertension (systolic BP \>160 mm Hg or diastolic BP \>90 mm Hg),
* Patients with one or more 11 seizures without a clear and resolved etiology,
* Patients starting hormonal treatment (e.g., estrogen) in the 3 months prior to Screening,
* Past intolerance or hypersensitivity to ketamine, or history of recreational use of phencyclidine (PCP) or ketamine,
* Past intolerance or hypersensitivity to midazolam,
* Age-related cognitive decline or mild dementia suggested by a score of \< 25 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at Screening,
* Patients taking medications with known activity at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) or AMPA glutamate receptor \[e.g., riluzole, amantadine, lamotrigine, memantine, topiramate, dextromethorphan, D-cycloserine\], or the muopioid receptor,
* Patients taking any of the following medications: St John's Wort, theophylline, tramadol, metrizamide,
* Patients who demonstrate \> 25% decrease in depressive symptoms as reflected by the QIDS-SR score from Screening to Randomization,
* Patients who have received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the past 6 months prior to Screening,
* Patients currently receiving treatment with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS).
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sanjay Mathew, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Murphy N, Lijffijt M, Ramakrishnan N, Vo-Le B, Vo-Le B, Iqbal S, Iqbal T, O'Brien B, Smith MA, Swann AC, Mathew SJ. Does mismatch negativity have utility for NMDA receptor drug development in depression? Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan-Feb;44(1):61-73. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1685.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLNA-001-14F
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.