The Effect of Different Financial Competing Interest Statements on Readers' Perceptions of Clinical Educational Articles

NCT ID: NCT02548312

Last Updated: 2019-06-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1065 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Financial ties with industry are common among doctors, academics and institutions. This trial aims to investigate the influence of different types of industry-linked activities on readers' perceptions of clinical reviews. Two clinical reviews have been selected on medical topics and study participants (practicing doctors) will be sent one review each. The reviews will be identical except for the inclusion of one of four different permutations of competing interest statements. Participants will be asked to rate the one review they are sent based on the study outcomes (confidence, interest, importance and likeliness to change practice). The study focus is on educational articles as these are intended to guide patient care and convey the authors' interpretation of selected data.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Review 1- competing interest statement 1

Variations of financial competing interest statements. There will be a statement that the authors have no competing interests.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Variations of financial competing interest statements

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be randomised to receive 1 of 2 review articles on different topics. For each review there will be 4 groups. Each of the 4 groups will receive an identical version of the review article with the exception of the competing interest statement which will vary depending on group assignment.

Review 1- competing interest statement 2

Variations of financial competing interest statements.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Variations of financial competing interest statements

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be randomised to receive 1 of 2 review articles on different topics. For each review there will be 4 groups. Each of the 4 groups will receive an identical version of the review article with the exception of the competing interest statement which will vary depending on group assignment.

Review 1- competing interest statement 3

Variations of financial competing interest statements.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Variations of financial competing interest statements

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be randomised to receive 1 of 2 review articles on different topics. For each review there will be 4 groups. Each of the 4 groups will receive an identical version of the review article with the exception of the competing interest statement which will vary depending on group assignment.

Review 1- competing interest statement 4

Variations of financial competing interest statements.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Variations of financial competing interest statements

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be randomised to receive 1 of 2 review articles on different topics. For each review there will be 4 groups. Each of the 4 groups will receive an identical version of the review article with the exception of the competing interest statement which will vary depending on group assignment.

Review 2- competing interest statement 1

Variations of financial competing interest statements. There will be a statement that the authors have no competing interests.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Variations of financial competing interest statements

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be randomised to receive 1 of 2 review articles on different topics. For each review there will be 4 groups. Each of the 4 groups will receive an identical version of the review article with the exception of the competing interest statement which will vary depending on group assignment.

Review 2- competing interest statement 2

Variations of financial competing interest statements.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Variations of financial competing interest statements

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be randomised to receive 1 of 2 review articles on different topics. For each review there will be 4 groups. Each of the 4 groups will receive an identical version of the review article with the exception of the competing interest statement which will vary depending on group assignment.

Review 2- competing interest statement 3

Variations of financial competing interest statements.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Variations of financial competing interest statements

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be randomised to receive 1 of 2 review articles on different topics. For each review there will be 4 groups. Each of the 4 groups will receive an identical version of the review article with the exception of the competing interest statement which will vary depending on group assignment.

Review 2- competing interest statement 4

Variations of financial competing interest statements.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Variations of financial competing interest statements

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be randomised to receive 1 of 2 review articles on different topics. For each review there will be 4 groups. Each of the 4 groups will receive an identical version of the review article with the exception of the competing interest statement which will vary depending on group assignment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Variations of financial competing interest statements

Participants will be randomised to receive 1 of 2 review articles on different topics. For each review there will be 4 groups. Each of the 4 groups will receive an identical version of the review article with the exception of the competing interest statement which will vary depending on group assignment.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Practising doctors in the UK who are members of the British Medical Association (BMA) and receive The BMJ will be included.

Exclusion Criteria

* BMA members who have opted out of receiving a free copy of The BMJ, public health doctors, consultant oral/dental surgeons, consultants in private practice, retired doctors and student members will be excluded.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The BMJ

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sara Schroter, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The BMJ

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schroter S, Pakpoor J, Morris J, Chew M, Godlee F. Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers' perceptions of clinical educational articles: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025029. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025029.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30782923 (View on PubMed)

Schroter S, Pakpoor J, Morris J, Chew M, Godlee F. Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers' perceptions of clinical educational articles: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 10;6(6):e012677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012677.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27288389 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COI-RCT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.