Slump Sitting X-ray of the Lumbar Spine Is Better Than Conventional Flexion View

NCT ID: NCT02547324

Last Updated: 2015-09-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, single-blinded, randomized-controlled study comparing a new method (slump-sitting) with the conventional method (forward erect bending) of performing lumbar spine flexion X-rays.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Power calculation was performed based on preliminary pilot results using a clinically set difference of 10 degrees (SD 15 degrees) change in mean global lumbar spine flexion between sitting and standing postures. An estimated sample population of 100 patients was deemed necessary for this study to fulfill a statistical power of 90% and a two-sided 5% significance level.

Block randomization of every 4 subjects was performed at the beginning of the study to ensure equal numbers of subjects in both study arms for comparison and these results were concealed in envelopes.

During the clinical consult, history taking was performed as per a usual clinic visit. Specific patient's details including age, occupation, presence and severity of back pain, presence and severity of leg pain, and neurological symptoms were documented. Physical examination was performed accordingly and parameters such as clinical range of motion of the lumbar spine, neurological signs and provocative tests were recorded for later analysis.

For the flexion radiographs, both the new and conventional methods were performed on each patient. These pictures were made into charts and visually displayed. They serve as instructional manuals for patients during the radioimaging process, which are again reinforced with verbal instructions from the on-duty radiographers.

Both images were done with the X-ray beam projected from the patients's left and at a distance of 100cm from the patient. The central beam was directed at the estimated centre of L3, with T11 vertebral body and mid-body of the sacrum serving as superior and inferior limits respectively. A single extension view of the lumbar spine was also performed after these flexion views. All radiographs were stored on Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format and viewed with Centricity Enterprise Web V3.0 (8.0.1400.128) for assessment.

Measurements were done by 2 independent reviewers and an average of their readings was recorded. Both reviewers were blinded to the method in which flexion X-rays was taken.

Interim data analysis is planned at 30th patient and the 60th patient. During this time point, the primary objective which look at mean global lumbar spine flexion between sitting and standing postures is assessed.

All collected data and measurements were tabulated using Microsoft Excel 2011(Version 14.0 (32-bit)) and analyzed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Version 23.0).

For the main analysis of both global and segmental lumbar flexion, as well as the measured displacements obtained between the two flexion methods, paired t-test was employed.

There is no requirement to follow up the patients in this study. The whole study is to be completed within 1 year of recruitment

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain Spondylolisthesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Slump sitting

Slump sitting flexion of lumbar spine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Slump sitting

Intervention Type RADIATION

Patients are asked to sit slumped on the chair as much as possible without leaning forwards, and place you hands below your thighs.

Forward bending

Forward erect bending of lumbar spine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Forward bending

Intervention Type RADIATION

Patients are asked to stand with both feet placed together, hands behind their heads, and bend forward in this position as much as possible without falling

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Slump sitting

Patients are asked to sit slumped on the chair as much as possible without leaning forwards, and place you hands below your thighs.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Forward bending

Patients are asked to stand with both feet placed together, hands behind their heads, and bend forward in this position as much as possible without falling

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients above 45 years of age;
* With mechanical low back pain,
* With spondylolisthesis
* Physically able to position themselves correctly for both methods of X-rays

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous spinal interventions
* Suspected findings for spinal malignancies, spinal trauma, and inflammatory spinal diseases
* Pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National University Hospital, Singapore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Orthosurgery

Dr. Hey Hwee Weng Dennis

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hee-Kit Wong, MBBS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

National University Health System

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013/00141

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.