Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-05-31
2010-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A prospective and randomized trial was performed in 44 patients. G1 patients received a physiotherapist orientation, and G2 patients received the booklet of exercise to self perform the exercises. Pain intensity by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and quality of life by SF-36 were measured before.
Results: Pain intensity was lower in G1 than in G2 after 6 and 12 weeks. Quality of life was better in G1.
The exercises under orientations of the physiotherapist promoted best effect than self performed exercises .
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All patients received an exercise booklet which consisted of stretching and strengthening of muscles. G1 patients were orientated by the physiotherapist during the performance of exercises once a week, using the booklet, and the patients in G2 (n=22) received the booklet to self perform the exercises without orientation of the physiotherapist. Everyone should perform the exercises once a day at home.
Pain intensity by VAS, and quality of life by SF-36 were measured before the start of treatment (T0), after 6 (T6) and 12 (T12) weeks. Side effects were recorded. Acetaminophen (up to 4 g / day) could be used as necessary.
The sample size was provided by SAS 8.0, SPSS 15.0 program. To detect difference in pain intensity of 3 between the groups by VAS, with 95% of power (estimated SD= 2.0), when the alpha level is set at 0.05, the sample should be of 16. The program used for statistical analysis was SAS 8.0, SPSS 15.0. The tests used were Student's T to compare age of patients, chi-square to compare gender and analgesic complementation, and Mann Whitney test for pain intensity and quality of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
physiotherapy orientated
G1 patients were orientated by the physiotherapist during the performance of physiotherapy exercises, using the booklet
G2 received the booklet to self perform the physiotherapy exercises
Physiotherapy exercise
once a day, during 15 minutes, for 12 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physiotherapy exercise
once a day, during 15 minutes, for 12 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* pain intensity greater than 3 by visual analogue scale and age \> 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* simultaneously submitted to another type of physical therapy,
* cognitive impairment, and
* pregnant women were excluded
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federal University of São Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rioko Kimiko Sakata
Pain Clinic Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rioko K Sakata, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEP1871/07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id