Effect of Modified Stylet Angulation on the Intubation With GlideScope®
NCT ID: NCT02547064
Last Updated: 2017-06-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
162 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of this study was to determine which of two stylet (70° vs 90°) was better, as determined by time to intubation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Different Stylet Angles for Orotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope® Video Laryngoscope in Children
NCT02952690
Comparison of GlideScope-Specific Rigid Stylet to Standard Malleable Stylet for GlideScope Intubation by Novice Operators
NCT00884754
Comparison of Lighted Stylet and GlideScope for Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation
NCT03514745
Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope
NCT02769221
Determining the Depth of Endotracheal Tube Insertion
NCT02158247
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
90 degree
The ETT with the 90° angle stylet was bent at a point 8 cm from its distal end.
Glidescope guided intubation
GlideScope®
70 degree
The ETT was bent by 70° at a point 6 cm from its distal end and the proximal portion of the ETT was formed as the shape of the GL blade until the point of the handle.
Glidescope guided intubation
GlideScope®
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Glidescope guided intubation
GlideScope®
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Rapid sequence induction
* Recent sore throat
* Fragile teeth
* Contraindication for videolaryngoscope
* Head and neck surgery
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hyun-Chang Kim
Assistant professor
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lee YC, Lee J, Son JD, Lee JY, Kim HC. Stylet angulation of 70 degrees reduces the time to intubation with the GlideScope(R): A prospective randomised trial. J Int Med Res. 2018 Apr;46(4):1428-1438. doi: 10.1177/0300060517741065. Epub 2018 Jan 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GlideMStylet
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.