Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of PT010, PT009 and PT003 in Subjects With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

NCT ID: NCT02536508

Last Updated: 2021-02-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

627 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-10

Study Completion Date

2017-09-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of PT010, PT009 and PT003 in Subjects with Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, 52-Week, Chronic-Dosing, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of PT010, PT009 and PT003 in Subjects with Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COPD

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Double-Blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BGF MDI (PT010) 320/14.4/9.6 μg

Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate (BGF) metered dose inhaler (MDI) (PT010, BGF MDI)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg

Intervention Type DRUG

Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate

GFF MDI (PT003) 14.4/9.6 μg

Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate (GFF) metered dose inhaler (MDI) (PT003, GFF MDI)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 μg

Intervention Type DRUG

Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate

BFF MDI (PT009) 320/9.6 μg

Budesonide and Formoterol Fumarate (BFF) metered dose inhaler (MDI) (PT009, BFF MDI)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg

Intervention Type DRUG

Budesonide and Formoterol Fumarate

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg

Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate

Intervention Type DRUG

GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 μg

Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate

Intervention Type DRUG

BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg

Budesonide and Formoterol Fumarate

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BGF MDI GFF MDI BFF MDI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Given their signed written informed consent to participate. Must have agreed to participate in and complete the lead-in Study PT010006.(NCT02497001)

Exclusion Criteria

Severe osteoporosis Unable to achieve an acceptable DEXA scan Inability to achieve pupil dilation to at least 6 mm Subjects with an implanted artificial intraocular lens or are scheduled to undergo cataract surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pearl Therapeutics, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Colin Reisner

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Pearl Therapeutics

Paul Dorinsky, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Pearl Therapeutics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Dothan, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jasper, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gold River, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Poway, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rolling Hills Estates, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dacula, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Norcross, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rincon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Edina, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Woodbury, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Charles, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gastonia, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hendersonville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dublin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Easley, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Old Point Station, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rock Hill, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Seneca, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Union, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kingwood, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Longview, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Abingdon, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Newport News, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Singh D, Hurst JR, Martinez FJ, Rabe KF, Bafadhel M, Jenkins M, Salazar D, Dorinsky P, Darken P. Predictive modeling of COPD exacerbation rates using baseline risk factors. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;16:17534666221107314. doi: 10.1177/17534666221107314.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35815359 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PT010008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT03313570

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

28-day Repeat Dose Study of GSK573719
NCT01030965 COMPLETED PHASE2
PT003 MDI Dose Confirmation Study
NCT01349816 COMPLETED PHASE2