Clinical Evaluation of a Vascular Venous Anastomotic Connector [InterGraft VIG-only Study]

NCT ID: NCT02532621

Last Updated: 2025-02-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

158 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-21

Study Completion Date

2022-01-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The InterGraft™ Venous Anastomotic Connector provides an endovascular, minimally invasive means for attachment of an arteriovenous graft to a vein in the upper extremity. The InterGraft™ Venous Anastomotic Connector facilitates creation of the arteriovenous graft connection to a vein in support of hemodialysis in subjects with End Stage Renal Disease. The InterGraft™ Venous Anastomotic Connector is used together with conventional suturing of the arterial anastomosis to facilitate creation of an arteriovenous graft in support of hemodialysis in subjects with End Stage Renal Disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The InterGraft™ Venous Anastomotic Connector (VIG) was developed for endovascular, minimally invasive venous anastomosis of a standard arteriovenous graft (AVG) for hemodialysis. This study will evaluate the safety and performance of the VIG for anastomosis of a commercially available, 6 mm diameter, synthetic AVG. Anastomoses with the VIG may potentially reduce venous vessel trauma, improve the local vessel wall shear stresses and promote laminar flow, thereby improving patency.

While recognizing that a native fistula is the recommended access for hemodialysis, AVGs remain a frequently used access type. This study focuses on subjects who have a failed fistula, cannot have a fistula or are better suited for an AVG, as determined by the physician. The implant procedural outcomes, the number and type of major adverse events, and patency throughout a six-month follow-up period will be evaluated. The six-month patency rate will be compared with a pre-specified patency performance goal drawn from surgical AVG literature and published performance standards.

This is a pivotal, multicenter, prospective, non-randomized design study. All enrolled subjects will receive the VIG device and will have a standard sutured arterial anastomosis.

A total of 158 evaluable subjects will be enrolled, defined as primary analysis population of 146 subjects plus allowance for 12 subjects lost-to-follow up.

The study includes10 participating clinical centers. Study site investigators are physicians skilled in AVG placement and interventional techniques. Study data will be collected up to the point at which each subject has completed the six-month endpoint or experienced a terminal study endpoint.

The study will be conducted in compliance with the Investigational Plan, Investigational Device Exemption regulations, Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and other applicable regulatory requirements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Renal Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Venous InterGraft Connector (VIG)

This is a nonrandomized, single-arm study: All enrolled patients are assigned to the same treatment: AVG implantation using a VIG (study device) to create the venous anastomosis and standard suturing to create the arterial anastomosis of the implanted AVG.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Venous InterGraft Connector

Intervention Type DEVICE

The device is designed for transcatheter delivery within a vein and connection to an AVG that has been tunneled under the skin in a standard manner. The connection is made via a small skin incision.

sutured arterial anastomosis of an implanted vascular graft for hemodialysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The arterial anastomosis of the implanted vascular graft for hemodialysis is formed using standard suturing technique.

hemodialysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The implanted vascular graft is intended as a vascular access for performing hemodialysis treatments.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Venous InterGraft Connector

The device is designed for transcatheter delivery within a vein and connection to an AVG that has been tunneled under the skin in a standard manner. The connection is made via a small skin incision.

Intervention Type DEVICE

sutured arterial anastomosis of an implanted vascular graft for hemodialysis

The arterial anastomosis of the implanted vascular graft for hemodialysis is formed using standard suturing technique.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

hemodialysis

The implanted vascular graft is intended as a vascular access for performing hemodialysis treatments.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VIG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age.
2. Subject requires the creation of a vascular access graft for hemodialysis, secondary to a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease.
3. Subject is able to have the vascular access graft placed in an upper extremity.
4. Baseline imaging shows suitable vascular anatomy/ vessel size for the InterGraft™ Venous Connector and an artery at least 3.5 mm in diameter that is suitable for creating the arterial anastomosis.
5. Subject has a reasonable expectation of remaining on hemodialysis for at least 6 months.
6. Subject or his/her legal guardian understands the study and is willing and able to comply with the dialysis schedule and follow-up requirements.
7. Subject or his/her legal guardian provides written informed consent. NOTE: In accordance with the requirements of some Institutional Review Boards, where applicable, only those subjects with capacity to consent for themselves will be included. Thus, where required by the Institutional Review Board, adult individuals who lack capacity to consent for themselves will be excluded from the study.
8. Physician's examination at time of surgery shows no significant vessel lesions, calcification(s), anatomic structures or abnormalities that may limit ability to safely deploy the InterGraft Connectors or create a sutured arterial anastomosis.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject has a documented and unsuccessfully treated ipsilateral central venous stenosis as determined by imaging.
2. Subject currently has a known or suspected bacterial, fungal, or HIV infection. NOTE: Patients with hepatitis B or C may be included in the study.
3. Subject has a known hypercoagulable or bleeding disorder or requires treatment with warfarin or heparin.

NOTE: The intent of this criterion is to exclude patients with high risk for bleeding or clotting complications. As such, patients who are taking oral anticoagulants (blood thinners) including, but not limited to, Xarelto® (rivaroxaban) or Eliquis® (apixaban) should also be excluded from the study. Patients may receive anticoagulation therapy any time after the study AV graft implant procedure, at their physician's discretion. This should be driven by an indication unrelated to the vascular access.
4. Subject has had a previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2) or has known sensitivity to heparin.
5. Subject has co-morbid conditions that may limit their ability to comply with study and follow-up requirements.
6. The patient has had \>2 previous arteriovenous accesses in treatment arm.
7. Subject is currently taking Aggrenox®.
8. Subject is in need of, or is scheduled for any major surgery within 30 days of the study procedure.
9. Subject is currently taking maintenance immunosuppressant medication such as rapamycin, mycophenolate or mycophenolic acid, prednisone (\>10 mg), cyclosporine, tacrolimus or cyclophosphamide.
10. Life expectancy is less than 12 months.
11. Subject is pregnant. NOTE: A negative urine pregnancy test within 24 hours of the study procedure is required in all female subjects with reproductive capacity.
12. Subject is a poor compliance risk (i.e. history of IV or oral drug abuse).
13. The subject is enrolled in another dialysis or vascular investigational study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Phraxis, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cindy M Setum, Ph.D

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Phraxis, Inc.

John R Ross, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Regional Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Triad of Alabama/Flowers Hospital

Dothan, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Cartersville Medical Center, LLC

Cartersville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Medical Center of Central Georgia - Navicent Health

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Health System- Dept of Surgery

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saint Louis University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Surgical Specialists of Charlotte

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

McLeod Physician Associates II

Florence, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg Regional Medical Center

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

U.S. Renal Data System. USRDS 2011 Annual Data Report: Volume 2. Atlas of End Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Diabetes, and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2011

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Dember LM, Beck GJ, Allon M, Delmez JA, Dixon BS, Greenberg A, Himmelfarb J, Vazquez MA, Gassman JJ, Greene T, Radeva MK, Braden GL, Ikizler TA, Rocco MV, Davidson IJ, Kaufman JS, Meyers CM, Kusek JW, Feldman HI; Dialysis Access Consortium Study Group. Effect of clopidogrel on early failure of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2164-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2164.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18477783 (View on PubMed)

Akoh JA. Prosthetic arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis. J Vasc Access. 2009 Jul-Sep;10(3):137-47. doi: 10.1177/112972980901000301.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19670164 (View on PubMed)

Roy-Chaudhury P, Kelly BS, Zhang J, Narayana A, Desai P, Melham M, Duncan H, Heffelfinger SC. Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: from pathophysiology to novel therapies. Blood Purif. 2003;21(1):99-110. doi: 10.1159/000067863.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12596755 (View on PubMed)

Lee T, Roy-Chaudhury P. Advances and new frontiers in the pathophysiology of venous neointimal hyperplasia and dialysis access stenosis. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2009 Sep;16(5):329-38. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2009.06.009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19695501 (View on PubMed)

Lok CE, Allon M, Moist L, Oliver MJ, Shah H, Zimmerman D. Risk equation determining unsuccessful cannulation events and failure to maturation in arteriovenous fistulas (REDUCE FTM I). J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Nov;17(11):3204-12. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006030190. Epub 2006 Sep 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16988062 (View on PubMed)

Lee HW, Allon M. When should a patient receive an arteriovenous graft rather than a fistula? Semin Dial. 2013 Jan-Feb;26(1):6-10. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12040. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23173947 (View on PubMed)

Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Agodoa LY, Albertus P, Ayanian J, Balkrishnan R, Bragg-Gresham J, Cao J, Chen JL, Cope E, Dharmarajan S, Dietrich X, Eckard A, Eggers PW, Gaber C, Gillen D, Gipson D, Gu H, Hailpern SM, Hall YN, Han Y, He K, Hebert H, Helmuth M, Herman W, Heung M, Hutton D, Jacobsen SJ, Ji N, Jin Y, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kapke A, Katz R, Kovesdy CP, Kurtz V, Lavalee D, Li Y, Lu Y, McCullough K, Molnar MZ, Montez-Rath M, Morgenstern H, Mu Q, Mukhopadhyay P, Nallamothu B, Nguyen DV, Norris KC, O'Hare AM, Obi Y, Pearson J, Pisoni R, Plattner B, Port FK, Potukuchi P, Rao P, Ratkowiak K, Ravel V, Ray D, Rhee CM, Schaubel DE, Selewski DT, Shaw S, Shi J, Shieu M, Sim JJ, Song P, Soohoo M, Steffick D, Streja E, Tamura MK, Tentori F, Tilea A, Tong L, Turf M, Wang D, Wang M, Woodside K, Wyncott A, Xin X, Zang W, Zepel L, Zhang S, Zho H, Hirth RA, Shahinian V. US Renal Data System 2016 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Mar;69(3 Suppl 1):A7-A8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.12.004. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28236831 (View on PubMed)

Burgess JS, Beaver JD, London M, Rohan V, Orland P, Yevzlin A, Setum C, Ross J; InterGraft Study Investigators. Prospective multicenter study of a novel endovascular venous anastomotic procedure and device for implantation of an arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis. J Vasc Access. 2024 Jul;25(4):1244-1251. doi: 10.1177/11297298231159691. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36895157 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Venous Anastomotic Connector

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Xeltis Hemodialysis Access Graft: aXess Pivotal Study
NCT05473299 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA