Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-12-31
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating the Use of Two Different Needles in Subjects With Diabetes
NCT00569426
Localisation of Potential Insulin Deposits in Normal Weight and Obese Diabetics Using 6 mm and 12 mm Long Needles
NCT00871416
Comparison of NovoFine® Needles (4 mm vs. 6 mm)
NCT00343343
Investigation of Pain During Subcutaneous Injections With Different Injection Speed and Volume Combinations
NCT01680328
Comparison of 2 NovoFine® Needles on the Reflux of Insulin
NCT00872560
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For the treatment of Type 1 diabetes, insulin has to be injected into the subcutaneous tissue from which it is taken up into the circulation. People with Type 1 Diabetes do not produce insulin and must thus inject insulin to stabilize blood sugar levels, typically via one or two daily injections with basal insulin, as well as so-called "bolus" injections at the time of each meal. This adds up to approximately 4-5 daily insulin injections. Type 2 diabetics, who are still "early" in the disease, have reduced sensitivity to the insulin they produce, so the pancreas overproduces insulin. Beyond lifestyle changes, treatment with metformin in tablet form will in this case be the first-line drug. In the later stages of the disease, the insulin production decreases and insulin therapy should be initiated, optionally in combination with a GLP-1 analogue (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1). It is estimated that only half of all people with Type 2 diabetes are diagnosed, and that half of those diagnosed are not in treatment. Worldwide, about 27% of the treated type 2 diabetic patients receive insulin treatment, or a GLP-1 analog, 1-2 times a day.
From the above figures it can be estimated that over 100 million diabetes injections are performed globally every day. In addition, other disorders also require subcutaneous administration of drugs, e.g. growth hormone therapy or inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or intestinal diseases. Thus, it is of great importance that the needles used for injections, are as painless and comfortable to use as possible.
The larger needle manufacturers have for many years sought to make needles less painful and to cause less skin trauma. Until recently, these measures have primarily been making needles thinner and shorter, but now needles with alternative grindings and needle tip designs are marketed. This is to compensate for the decreased robustness of the new very thin needles, which increase the risk of the patients damaging the needle tip during an injection. Little is known, however, of how these design changes influence the perception of pain, skin damage, etc.
Despite the large market for subcutaneous needles, the methods to test newly developed needles have remained the same for many years. One of the methods frequently used is a mechanical test where the needle is passed through a rubber strip, and the penetration force is measured. This method is rapid, reproducible and with very little variation, but there are no published data comparing the force measured in the rubber strip, with that measured in humans, and how or if the penetration force in a rubber strip relates to pain, discomfort, or other physiological parameters. Smith compares the insertion forces measured in the rubber strip and in a piece of cut off porcine tissue with the conclusion that these two behave very differently and that the rubber strip is estimated to be primarily useful in testing the needle lubrication and other friction-reducing parameters.
The second method often used is a subjective patient assessment, where the test subject uses a 'Visual Analogue Scale' (VAS) to indicate how much pain he or she experiences in connection with the needle insertion. Pain indicated by VAS is a known and accepted method, but is simultaneously a measurement method with great variety, because a person's pain sensitivity depends on many things such as stress levels, emotional state, as well as expectations for the experience.
This project is innovative in that it introduces a new method for quantitatively measuring small tissue damages in the skin, as for example, a needle insertion.
The study combines technological and medical research in the form of mechanical design of medical devices and biological evaluation of mechanical impact, which in our opinion is highly relevant and quite innovative. Results from this study will be used to develop new and improved needles, which are predicted to increase patient satisfaction and make everyday life with injections easier and more convenient for the many millions of people with diabetes who every day take insulin and / or GLP-1 injections .
The method is based on the Laser Speckle technology, and measures the tissue damage in terms of the increased skin blood perfusion in connection with a needle insertion. Prior to this project, the project group performed a number of tests on pigs and the method has proven to be sensitive enough to detect differences in the blood perfusion that occurs as a result of differences in tissue damage caused by insertion of needles that vary less than 0.1 mm in diameter, Williams et al used a photoelectric pletysmografi (PPG) to investigate changes in skin blood perfusion in human subjects following injections with insulin and diluted insulin, as well as with a needle insertion to investigate the effect of the needle trauma alone. A rapid increase in blood flow was seen for all interventions. Insulin injections resulted in increased signal for more than 60 minutes after the injection, whereas the diluted liquid and the needle insertion created an increased signal for about 10 minutes. By using laser Doppler technology, Rayman et al studied how the skin circulation changed after needle insertion in people with and without diabetes. The study revealed that the people with diabetes had lower maximum-perfusion after needle insertion than the healthy subjects. Both of the above mentioned clinical studies indicate that the method obtained from the project group's pig studies could be transferred to a human study.
Thus, the study will include 35 test subjects who will receive needle insertions with 18 differently designed needles. Penetration force through the skin, pain perception and skin blood perfusion will be recorded for all needles, and any skin reactions will be recorded. By the end of the study, the following questions can be answered:
1. Which needle design parameters influence pain and skin blood perfusion, and are these two effects related?
2. Does skin blood perfusion after needle insertions in humans compare with those measured in pigs?
3. Does penetration force relate to pain and skin blood perfusion, which needle design parameters influence the force in skin, and how does it relate to the penetration force in a rubber strip?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Subcutaneous insertions of needles
36 subcutaneous needle insertions per participant with 18 differently designed needles. 30test participants in total. No fluid will be injected. Pain perception will be rated by the subjects, penetration force and skin blood perfusion will be measured, and any skin reactions will be assessed.
Subcutaneous insertions of needles
Various types of needles with different designs and mechanical properties.
Five marketed needles are included: NovoFine 28G x 12 mm (Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark), NovoFine 30G x 6 mm (Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark), NovoFine 32G tip x 6 mm (Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark), BD Ultra-Fine 32G x 4 mm Pentapoint (Beckton, Dickinson \& Company, USA), and Terumo Nanopass 34G x 5 mm (Terumo, Japan).
Ten needles have been exclusively manufactured for this clinical trial by Hart Needles, USA. These needles vary in diameter, number of needle tip grinding, and angles of grindings.
Three needles have been modified from the original (NovoFine 32G x 6 mm) with lack of lubrication or damaged needle tip for simulations of repeated use.
No drugs are injected. Only the needle insertion is evaluated.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subcutaneous insertions of needles
Various types of needles with different designs and mechanical properties.
Five marketed needles are included: NovoFine 28G x 12 mm (Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark), NovoFine 30G x 6 mm (Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark), NovoFine 32G tip x 6 mm (Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark), BD Ultra-Fine 32G x 4 mm Pentapoint (Beckton, Dickinson \& Company, USA), and Terumo Nanopass 34G x 5 mm (Terumo, Japan).
Ten needles have been exclusively manufactured for this clinical trial by Hart Needles, USA. These needles vary in diameter, number of needle tip grinding, and angles of grindings.
Three needles have been modified from the original (NovoFine 32G x 6 mm) with lack of lubrication or damaged needle tip for simulations of repeated use.
No drugs are injected. Only the needle insertion is evaluated.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Are a man or woman with type 2 diabetes. An equal distribution of men and women is sought to compare findings between the sexes.
* Take daily injection(s) of anti-diabetic medicine (insulin or glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues) with a pen or syringe, and have done so for more than 6 months.
* Are 18-70 years (both included)
* Are slightly overweight, i.e. BMI 25-35 kg/m2.
* Are inactive for at least 6 hours before the study, i.e. transport to the investigation must be carried out without significant physical activity.
* Are Caucasian. Inclusion of other ethnicities can increase data variation and a darker skin tone can make it difficult to read any skin reactions.
* Have no significant body hair on the abdomen (can be shaved away, and if so, this should be done at least 48 hours before the test day)
Exclusion Criteria
* Known or suspected hypersensitivity to needles, including the needle's lubricant (typically silicon oil), pen / ink color, or other materials that come into contact with the injection site
* Previous participation in the trial
* Intake of medical product which may influence pain perception within the last 14 days before trial
* Insulin pump user
* Previous surgery in the abdominal wall
* Intake of any painkillers within the last week before the test (low-dose aspirin in cardiovascular prophylactic doses is allowed)
* Known active or inactive skin diseases in the abdominal area that may influence pain perception or blood perfusion
* Anticoagulant therapy within the last month (low-dose aspirin in cardiovascular prophylactic doses is authorized, except on test day)
* Pregnant or breastfeeding
* Consumption of alcohol within the last 24 hours before the test
* Intake of drugs within the last 48 hours before the experiment
* Smokers and ex-smokers who use nicotine products (allowed if not used within the past 6 months prior to study entry)
* Moderate to severe lipodystrophy
* Severe neuropathy (grade 0/8, 1/8 or 2/8). This is examined with a Rydell-Seiffer tuning fork.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novo Nordisk A/S
INDUSTRY
University of Copenhagen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bente Merete Stallknecht
Professor, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kezia A Præstmark, M.Sc.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Copenhagen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hart JT. Rule of halves: implications of increasing diagnosis and reducing dropout for future workload and prescribing costs in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Mar;42(356):116-9.
Smith WC, Lee AJ, Crombie IK, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Control of blood pressure in Scotland: the rule of halves. BMJ. 1990 Apr 14;300(6730):981-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6730.981.
Weinger K, Beverly EA. Barriers to achieving glycemic targets: who omits insulin and why? Diabetes Care. 2010 Feb;33(2):450-2. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2132. No abstract available.
Hirsch L, Gibney M, Berube J, Manocchio J. Impact of a modified needle tip geometry on penetration force as well as acceptability, preference, and perceived pain in subjects with diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 1;6(2):328-35. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600216.
Hirsch LJ, Gibney MA, Albanese J, Qu S, Kassler-Taub K, Klaff LJ, Bailey TS. Comparative glycemic control, safety and patient ratings for a new 4 mm x 32G insulin pen needle in adults with diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jun;26(6):1531-41. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.482499.
Jaber A, Bozzato GB, Vedrine L, Prais WA, Berube J, Laurent PE. A novel needle for subcutaneous injection of interferon beta-1a: effect on pain in volunteers and satisfaction in patients with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2008 Oct 10;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-8-38.
Iwanaga M, Kamoi K. Patient perceptions of injection pain and anxiety: a comparison of NovoFine 32-gauge tip 6mm and Micro Fine Plus 31-gauge 5mm needles. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Feb;11(2):81-6. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0027.
Arendt-Nielsen L, Egekvist H, Bjerring P. Pain following controlled cutaneous insertion of needles with different diameters. Somatosens Mot Res. 2006 Mar-Jun;23(1-2):37-43. doi: 10.1080/08990220600700925.
Egekvist H, Bjerring P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Pain and mechanical injury of human skin following needle insertions. Eur J Pain. 1999 Mar;3(1):41-49. doi: 10.1053/eujp.1998.0099.
Schwartz S, Hassman D, Shelmet J, Sievers R, Weinstein R, Liang J, Lyness W. A multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-period crossover trial comparing glycemic control, satisfaction, and preference achieved with a 31 gauge x 6 mm needle versus a 29 gauge x 12.7 mm needle in obese patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2004 Oct;26(10):1663-78. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.10.007.
Kreugel G, Keers JC, Kerstens MN, Wolffenbuttel BH. Randomized trial on the influence of the length of two insulin pen needles on glycemic control and patient preference in obese patients with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Jul;13(7):737-41. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0010. Epub 2011 Apr 10.
Praestmark KA, Jensen CB, Stallknecht B, Madsen NB, Kildegaard J. Skin blood perfusion and cellular response to insertion of insulin pen needles with different diameters. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):752-9. doi: 10.1177/1932296814531099. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
Williams G, Pickup J, Clark A, Bowcock S, Cooke E, Keen H. Changes in blood flow close to subcutaneous insulin injection sites in stable and brittle diabetics. Diabetes. 1983 May;32(5):466-73. doi: 10.2337/diab.32.5.466.
Rayman G, Williams SA, Spencer PD, Smaje LH, Wise PH, Tooke JE. Impaired microvascular hyperaemic response to minor skin trauma in type I diabetes. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 May 17;292(6531):1295-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6531.1295.
Praestmark KA, Jensen ML, Madsen NB, Kildegaard J, Stallknecht BM. Pen needle design influences ease of insertion, pain, and skin trauma in subjects with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016 Dec 15;4(1):e000266. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000266. eCollection 2016.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-6-2014-042
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.