Comparison of Glycemic Control in Obese Diabetics Using Three Different Pen Needles
NCT ID: NCT01231984
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
293 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-10-31
2012-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the BD Ultra-Fine™ Nano 4mm x 32 Gauge(G) pen needle manufactured by Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD) provides equivalent glucose control (as measured by hemoglobin A1c levels) as the BD Ultra-Fine™ 8mm x 31G and the BD Ultra-Fine™ 12.7mm x 29G pen needles in obese subjects with diabetes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Glycemic Control Among Diabetics Using Three Different Pen Needles
NCT00928057
Evaluation of a 4mmx32G Pen Needle for Injection of Basal Insulin Doses Above 40 Units
NCT01334606
Evaluating the Use of Two Different Needles in Subjects With Diabetes
NCT00569426
Comparative User Experiences With BD Nano™ PRO 4mm x 32G Extra Thin Wall Pen Needle vs Three Commercially Available Pen Needles
NCT03878758
Comparison of Glycemic Control Achieved With 2 Different Needles
NCT00572052
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Only subjects who complete the wash-in period and confirm their agreement to continue participating will be randomized into one of the two study arms. Subjects will be randomly assigned to use the BD Ultra-Fine™ 4mm pen needle and either the BD Ultra-Fine™ 8mm pen needle or the BD Ultra-Fine™ 12.7mm pen needle. The randomization will also specify which of the two study pen needles to be used first. Half of the study subjects will use the BD Ultra-Fine™ 4mm and BD Ultra-Fine™ 8mm pen needles (4mm/8mm arm) and the other half will use the BD Ultra-Fine™ 4mm and the BD Ultra-Fine™ 12.7mm pen needles (4mm/12.7mm arm). At the end of the first 12 week study period subjects will switch to the other assigned pen needle for the second and final study period.
Glycemic control (based on HbA1c concentrations) will be assessed at baseline and at the end of each 12 week study period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
4 mm vs. 8 mm
Subjects randomized to this study arm first used either the 4 mm x 32G Pen Needle or the 8mm x 31G Pen Needle for 12 weeks (Period 1), then switched to the alternate pen needle (PN) for another 12 weeks (Period 2). Order of PN use was randomly determined.
4 mm x 32G Pen Needle
During the 12 week study period, subjects use this pen needle with their own pen device for all daily insulin injections they usually administered themselves with a pen device. Subjects follow their usual insulin regimen and there is no upper limit on total daily insulin dosage or number of injections. Subjects are advised to inject straight in when using the 4mm PN, with no pinch up.
8mm x 31G Pen Needle
During the 12 week study period, subjects will use this pen needle with their own pen device for all daily insulin injections they usually administered themselves with a pen device. Subjects follow their usual insulin regimen and there is no upper limit on total daily insulin dosage or number of injections. Subjects are directed to use pinch-up when injecting in the abdomen or thigh with the 8mm PN, and no pinch-up at other injection sites.
4 mm vs. 12.7 mm
Subjects randomized to this study arm first used either the 4 mm x 32G Pen Needle or the 12.7mm x 29G Pen Needle (PN) for 12 weeks (Period 1), then switched to the alternate PN for another 12 weeks (Period 2). Order of PN use was randomly determined.
4 mm x 32G Pen Needle
During the 12 week study period, subjects use this pen needle with their own pen device for all daily insulin injections they usually administered themselves with a pen device. Subjects follow their usual insulin regimen and there is no upper limit on total daily insulin dosage or number of injections. Subjects are advised to inject straight in when using the 4mm PN, with no pinch up.
12.7mm x 29G Pen Needle
During the 12 week study period, subjects will use this pen needle with their own pen device for all daily insulin injections they usually administered themselves with a pen device. Subjects follow their usual insulin regimen and there is no upper limit on total daily insulin dosage or number of injections. When using the 12.7mm PN, subjects are instructed to insert either at an angle of 45 degrees, or to pinch up and hold the pen device at a 90 degree angle (straight in).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
4 mm x 32G Pen Needle
During the 12 week study period, subjects use this pen needle with their own pen device for all daily insulin injections they usually administered themselves with a pen device. Subjects follow their usual insulin regimen and there is no upper limit on total daily insulin dosage or number of injections. Subjects are advised to inject straight in when using the 4mm PN, with no pinch up.
8mm x 31G Pen Needle
During the 12 week study period, subjects will use this pen needle with their own pen device for all daily insulin injections they usually administered themselves with a pen device. Subjects follow their usual insulin regimen and there is no upper limit on total daily insulin dosage or number of injections. Subjects are directed to use pinch-up when injecting in the abdomen or thigh with the 8mm PN, and no pinch-up at other injection sites.
12.7mm x 29G Pen Needle
During the 12 week study period, subjects will use this pen needle with their own pen device for all daily insulin injections they usually administered themselves with a pen device. Subjects follow their usual insulin regimen and there is no upper limit on total daily insulin dosage or number of injections. When using the 12.7mm PN, subjects are instructed to insert either at an angle of 45 degrees, or to pinch up and hold the pen device at a 90 degree angle (straight in).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Using a pen device for self-injection of all diabetes-related medications for at least two months prior to screening.
* 18 to 80 years of age, inclusive.
* Body Mass Index of at least 30 kg/m².
* Hemoglobin A1c from 5.5 to 9.5 percent (%), inclusive.
* Self-monitor blood glucose at least twice per day with a memory blood glucose meter, and willing to do so at least twice per day for the duration of the study
* On a stable diabetes treatment regimen (for example, no change to non-insulin therapies)for at least 2 months prior to screening
* Able to read, write and follow instructions in English or Spanish.
Exclusion Criteria
* Currently use a syringe to inject insulin or any other diabetes-related medication.
* Pregnancy.
* History of intravenous drug abuse.
* Current status or history of a medical condition that would contraindicate treatment with the study product or other conditions which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would place the subject at risk or have the potential to confound interpretation of the study results (i.e. recent history of ketoacidosis, hypoglycemic unawareness, etc.)
* Participated in any one of the following clinical studies:
* BDDC-08-011, 'Comparison of Glycemic Control among Diabetics using the 4mm x 32G BD Pen Needle versus the 8mm x 31G BD Pen Needle and the 5mm x 31G BD Pen Needle'.
* DBC-10-SQUIR04, 'Evaluation of Glycemic Control and User Acceptability of the BD Ultrafine Nano 4mm x 32G Pen Needle for Injection of Long-Acting or Basal Insulin Doses Above 40 Units'
* DBC-10-EMRLD01, 'Design Validation of BD 5-bevel Pen Needles (4,5 and 8mm) in Subjects with Diabetes'
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Becton, Dickinson and Company
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laurence Hirsch, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
BD Medical - Diabetes Care
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AMCR Institute, Inc.
Escondido, California, United States
Atlanta Diabetes Associates
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Springfield Diabetes and Endocrine Center
Springfield, Illinois, United States
International Diabetes Center (IDC)
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Diabetes and Endocrine Associates
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
The Molly Diabetes Center for Adults and Children at Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Mountain Diabetes and Endocrine Center
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
University Diabetes and Endocrine Consultants
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Clinical Trials of Texas, Inc
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Corporate Lane Internal Medicine and Research Center
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gibney MA, Arce CH, Byron KJ, Hirsch LJ. Skin and subcutaneous adipose layer thickness in adults with diabetes at sites used for insulin injections: implications for needle length recommendations. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jun;26(6):1519-30. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.481203.
Bergenstal RM, Strock ES, Peremislov D, Gibney MA, Parvu V, Hirsch LJ. Safety and efficacy of insulin therapy delivered via a 4mm pen needle in obese patients with diabetes. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Mar;90(3):329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DBC-10-SQUIR05
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.