Trial of a Best-Practice Alert in the Electronic Medical Record to Reduce Unnecessary Telemetry Monitoring

NCT ID: NCT02529176

Last Updated: 2019-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1021 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized trial of a best-practice alert delivered via the electronic medical record (Apex) to physicians on the Medicine service at UCSF Medical Center over a six month period. The alert notifies physicians that their order for continuous cardiac monitoring (telemetry) for a given patient has exceeded the duration recommended by national guidelines and offers them the opportunity to discontinue monitoring if they feel it is clinically appropriate. Physicians will be randomized to either receive the BPA or not, with the anticipation that physicians in the intervention arm will discontinue unnecessary telemetry.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Physicians often order continuous cardiac monitoring (telemetry) for their patients in the hospital. Telemetry provides real-time heart rate and rhythm monitoring and can be useful for detecting arrhythmias and evaluating the response to cardiac therapies. Leads on the patient's chest detect the electrical signature of the heartbeat, relay the information to a box in the patient's shirt pocket, and this box relays the signal in real-time to a control room where technicians monitor for abnormalities. If a technician notes an abnormality he or she will contact the appropriate provider. Currently, physicians can order telemetry at UCSF Medical Center with or without providing an indication for its use. In addition, telemetry remains active until the provider discontinues it or the patient leaves the hospital. Studies at UCSF and hospitals nationwide demonstrate that telemetry is overused. Physicians either order it without a valid indication or they do not remember to discontinue it when the indication is no longer valid. Guidelines published by the American Heart Association provide clarity regarding what clinical conditions warrant telemetry and for how long. However, numerous studies demonstrate that physicians do not faithfully follow these guidelines. This led the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation to urge physicians in Hospital Medicine to develop protocols governing the use of telemetry outside of the intensive care unit in a 2013 campaign called Choosing Wisely.

The harms of telemetry overuse are myriad: 1) Frequent false or unimportant alarms lead to alarm fatigue and studies have documented patient harm when subsequent real alarms were ignored. False alarms also often necessitate a visit to the patient by the nurse and this distracts the nurse from other patients, 2) Monitoring patients without an active cardiac condition often reveals clinically unimportant abnormalities that obligate physicians to work them up, just by virtue of having seen them on monitor. The work-up then results in unnecessary cost and anxiety, 3) Leads on the patient's chest often fall off with movement and have to be replaced by the nurse. This discourages patients from getting more exercise while they are hospitalized, which is a risk factor for muscle atrophy, and getting enough sleep, which is a risk factor for delirium, 4) Telemetry is not available for all hospital beds at UCSF and even units where it is available have limitations for the types of arrhythmias they can monitor. Thus, telemetry monitoring for a patient who does not need it can prevent another patient from having timely access to a monitor-capable bed.

In order to reduce unnecessary telemetry use, we propose to use a best-practice alert (BPA) delivered to physicians by the electronic medical record (Apex). We propose to study this BPA in a randomized trial. Physicians on the Medicine service would be randomized to either receive the BPA on their patients or not during a six month study period. We would examine both groups for the following outcomes: physician response to the alert, total hours of telemetry used, number of rapid response activations for arrhythmic events, and number of code blue events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arrhythmia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Best-practice alert

Receive the best-practice alert (BPA) during the course of their clinical work in the electronic medical record.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Best-practice alert

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The best-practice alert notifies physicians that their patient's telemetry monitoring duration has exceeded national guidelines and gives the physician the option to: discontinue monitoring if they feel it is clinically appropriate, dismiss the alert, or re-alert in four hours.

No alert

Physicians will receive no best-practice alert from the electronic medical record.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Best-practice alert

The best-practice alert notifies physicians that their patient's telemetry monitoring duration has exceeded national guidelines and gives the physician the option to: discontinue monitoring if they feel it is clinically appropriate, dismiss the alert, or re-alert in four hours.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BPA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Resident or attending physician on the Medicine service during the six month trial period.

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nader Najafi, MD

Assistant Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nader Najafi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Estrada CA, Rosman HS, Prasad NK, Battilana G, Alexander M, Held AC, Young MJ. Role of telemetry monitoring in the non-intensive care unit. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Nov 1;76(12):960-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80270-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7484840 (View on PubMed)

Najafi N, Auerbach A. Use and outcomes of telemetry monitoring on a medicine service. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Sep 24;172(17):1349-50. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3163. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22892708 (View on PubMed)

Benjamin EM, Klugman RA, Luckmann R, Fairchild DG, Abookire SA. Impact of cardiac telemetry on patient safety and cost. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jun 1;19(6):e225-32.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23844751 (View on PubMed)

Dressler R, Dryer MM, Coletti C, Mahoney D, Doorey AJ. Altering overuse of cardiac telemetry in non-intensive care unit settings by hardwiring the use of American Heart Association guidelines. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Nov;174(11):1852-4. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4491. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25243419 (View on PubMed)

Najafi N, Cucina R, Pierre B, Khanna R. Assessment of a Targeted Electronic Health Record Intervention to Reduce Telemetry Duration: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;179(1):11-15. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5859.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30535345 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BPA818

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

START & STOPP in GWI
NCT03560830 COMPLETED