Telemetry for Chest Pain of Low Risk for Acute Coronary Syndrome Pts
NCT ID: NCT02330328
Last Updated: 2020-01-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Surveillance Monitoring as an Alternative to Telemetry
NCT03039738
A Randomized Trial of Telemetry Compared With Unmonitored Floor Admissions in ED Patients With Low-Risk Chest Pain
NCT03906812
Feasibility And Efficacy Of Continuous In-Hospital Patient Monitoring
NCT01549717
Necklace-Shaped Sensor for Non-Invasive Remote Monitoring of Vitals
NCT02337790
Suitability of Unobtrusive Bed Monitoring and Wrist-worn Heart Rate Monitor for Patient Monitoring
NCT03572751
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The research coordinators will collect information on the following items for data collection: age, gender, smoking history, history of hypertension, history of diabetes mellitus, history of hypercholesterolemia, and history of family member with early heart disease or myocardial infarction, and body mass index. Research coordinators will document if the patient had any of the following events during their hospital course: death, myocardial infarction (MI), upgrade to a higher level of care, dysrhythmia, results of any stress testing or cardiac catheterization. In addition patients will be contacted at 30 days and 365 days to inquire about MI, needing for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or revascularization (CABG).
Based on previous studies, we hypothesize that patients aged 18-49 years who are at low risk for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) are unlikely to benefit from continuous heart monitoring while admitted to the hospital for chest pain. We suspect that the rate of significant events may approach zero in this group of participants. This study aim is to show that a bed without remote monitoring- telemetry- is adequate when these low risk participants with chest pain are hospitalized.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No Telemetry Monitoring
The participants in this arm will be admitted to a bed without telemetry monitoring
No Telemetry Monitoring
Telemetry
The participants in this arm will be admitted to a bed with telemetry monitoring
Telemetry Monitoring
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No Telemetry Monitoring
Telemetry Monitoring
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Have an initial troponin serum value above the threshold for that hospital's normal limit
* Have used cocaine in the previous 14 days (patient report)
* Have an abnormal ECG as determined by attending emergency physician
* Unable to consent for the study due to language barrier or mental incapacity
* Admitting attending physician does not agree with randomization of the patient into either study arm
* Pregnancy
18 Years
49 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
University of Maryland, College Park
OTHER
Virginia Commonwealth University
OTHER
Medstar Health Research Institute
OTHER
Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute
OTHER
Carilion Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Perkins, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Carlion Clinic
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Estrada CA, Rosman HS, Prasad NK, Battilana G, Alexander M, Held AC, Young MJ. Role of telemetry monitoring in the non-intensive care unit. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Nov 1;76(12):960-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80270-7.
Hollander JE, Sites FD, Pollack CV Jr, Shofer FS. Lack of utility of telemetry monitoring for identification of cardiac death and life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias in low-risk patients with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;43(1):71-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00719-4.
Durairaj L, Reilly B, Das K, Smith C, Acob C, Husain S, Saquib M, Ganschow P, Evans A, McNutt R. Emergency department admissions to inpatient cardiac telemetry beds: a prospective cohort study of risk stratification and outcomes. Am J Med. 2001 Jan;110(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00640-9.
O'Neill DR. Low-risk classified chest pain patients: Do they need cardiac monitoring in the emergency department and can they be cared for in non-monitored beds? Australian Emerg Nur J 2007; 10:58-63.
Perkins JC, Voore N, Patel J, et al: Assessment of an Emergency Department Chest Pain Patient Cohort at Low Risk for Significant Adverse Events During Admission for Acute Coronary Syndrome. SAEM Mid-Atlantic Regional Meeting, 02/2014, Philadephia, PA.
Perkins J, McCurdy MT, Vilke GM, Al-Marshad AA. Telemetry bed usage for patients with low-risk chest pain: review of the literature for the clinician. J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.098. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
Hermann LK, Weingart SD, Duvall WL, Henzlova MJ. The limited utility of routine cardiac stress testing in emergency department chest pain patients younger than 40 years. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;54(1):12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
Collin MJ, Weisenthal B, Walsh KM, McCusker CM, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Young patients with chest pain: 1-year outcomes. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;29(3):265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.031. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
Than M, Cullen L, Aldous S, Parsonage WA, Reid CM, Greenslade J, Flaws D, Hammett CJ, Beam DM, Ardagh MW, Troughton R, Brown AF, George P, Florkowski CM, Kline JA, Peacock WF, Maisel AS, Lim SH, Lamanna A, Richards AM. 2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 5;59(23):2091-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.035. Epub 2012 May 9.
Henriques-Forsythe MN, Ivonye CC, Jamched U, Kamuguisha LK, Olejeme KA, Onwuanyi AE. Is telemetry overused? Is it as helpful as thought? Cleve Clin J Med. 2009 Jun;76(6):368-72. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.76a.07260.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Telemetry bed usage for patient with low risk chest pain.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NA_00091964
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.