Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mesalamine 2 g Sachet for the Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis (UC) (NCT NCT02522780)
NCT ID: NCT02522780
Last Updated: 2021-11-08
Results Overview
The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
276 participants
Month 6
2021-11-08
Participant Flow
A total of 50 sites in 10 countries randomized subjects to this trial between February 2016 to April 2018, the last subject completed last visit in September 2018. Of 403 subjects screened, 276 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either mesalamine or placebo group (138 subjects each), for 6 months.
Of 276 subjects, (a) 53 were rolled-over from Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) who achieved remission after 8-weeks double-blind treatment with placebo (Pathway 1a; 4 subjects) or mesalamine (Pathway 1b; 10 subjects), or an additional 8-weeks open-label treatment with mesalamine (Pathway 2; 39 subjects), and (b) 223 subjects were de novo (Pathway 3).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Mesalamine
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally once daily (QD) for 6 months.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
138
|
138
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
137
|
135
|
|
Overall Study
Intention-to-treat (ITT) Population
|
136
|
136
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
121
|
111
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
17
|
27
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Mesalamine
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally once daily (QD) for 6 months.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Consent withdrawn by subject
|
5
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol deviation
|
1
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Subject refused endoscopic procedure
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse event, non-fatal
|
11
|
16
|
Baseline Characteristics
Mesalamine 2 g Sachet for the Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Total
n=272 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
130 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
256 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.50 • n=5 Participants
|
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.65 • n=7 Participants
|
43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.67 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
147 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
130 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
257 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
130 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
130 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
260 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
24.56 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.812 • n=5 Participants
|
24.89 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.657 • n=7 Participants
|
24.73 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.729 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6
|
82 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 2, 4, and 6Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
The proportion of subjects in clinical remission was defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 for stool frequency based on clinical response score component of the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score. Clinical response score component had two subscales to assess subject's symptoms: rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes) and stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal). The scores of clinical response component ranged from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 2
|
122 Participants
|
116 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 4
|
113 Participants
|
113 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 6
|
96 Participants
|
89 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy (up to 6 months)Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
Time to relapse was defined as the number of days from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Relapse
|
NA days
Median and 95% confidence interval (CI) was not estimable due to insufficient events to meet the threshold for 50% on the Kaplan-Meier curve.
|
NA days
Median and 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient events to meet the threshold for 50% on the Kaplan-Meier curve.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
The proportion of subjects with an increase from baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or more points in at least 1 component, or by 1 or more points in at least 2 components were reported. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical Response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic Response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6
|
14 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
The adjusted mean change from baseline in serum CRP levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 2
|
0.8 mg/L
Standard Deviation 4.76
|
2.2 mg/L
Standard Deviation 15.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 4
|
1.0 mg/L
Standard Deviation 5.69
|
0.9 mg/L
Standard Deviation 5.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 6
|
0.8 mg/L
Standard Deviation 3.67
|
2.5 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
The adjusted mean change from baseline in fecal calprotectin levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 2
|
-94.8 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 553.00
|
12.8 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 509.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 4
|
-41.7 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 533.02
|
53.6 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 581.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 6
|
-43.5 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 553.13
|
36.4 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 559.98
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult subjects with ulcerative colitis. It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Subjects were asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). The total IBDQ was computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. The adjusted mean change from baseline at Month 2, 4, and 6 for the IBDQ total scores were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6
Month 2
|
-1.3 points on a score
Standard Deviation 17.78
|
-0.4 points on a score
Standard Deviation 20.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6
Month 4
|
-0.6 points on a score
Standard Deviation 20.40
|
-0.3 points on a score
Standard Deviation 18.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6
Month 6
|
-0.5 points on a score
Standard Deviation 24.80
|
-1.2 points on a score
Standard Deviation 23.44
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Month 6Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set which included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical trial. Any AEs includes serious as well as non-serious AEs. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. Any AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (investigational medicinal product \[IMP\] intake) to the end of treatment visit (Month 6) was considered treatment-emergent. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=137 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=135 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Any Treatment-Emergent AEs
|
42 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Treatment-Emergent SAEs
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Month 6Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set.
The number of subjects with intensity of AEs (classified as mild, moderate or severe) were presented. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=137 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=135 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Severity of Adverse Events
Mild
|
32 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Severity of Adverse Events
Moderate
|
18 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Severity of Adverse Events
Severe
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in hematology values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (Hematology): Basophils/Leukocytes: \>=5%, Eosinophils/Leukocytes: \>=10%, Erythrocytes: \<=3.5\*10\^6/μL, Hematocrit: \<=0.32%; \>=0.56%, Hemoglobin: \<=11.5 g/dL, Leukocytes: \<=2.8\*10\^3/μL; \>=16.0\*10\^3/μL, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: \<=10%; \>=80%, Monocytes/Leukocytes: \>=20%, Neutrophils/Leukocytes: \<=15%; \>=90%, Platelets: \<=75\*10\^3/μL; \>=700\*10\^3/μL. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=137 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=135 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Hemoglobin: <=11.5 g/dL
|
29 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Basophils/Leukocytes: >=5%
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Eosinophils/Leukocytes: >=10%
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Erythrocytes: <=3.5*10^6/μL
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Hematocrit: <=0.32%
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Hematocrit: >=0.56%
|
8 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Leukocytes: <=2.8*10^3/μL
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Leukocytes: >=16.0*10^3/μL
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: <=10%
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: >=80%
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Monocytes/Leukocytes: >=20%
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Neutrophils/Leukocytes: <=15%
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Neutrophils/Leukocytes: >=90%
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Platelets: <=75*10^3/μL
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Platelets: >=700*10^3/μL
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in coagulation values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (coagulation): Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT): \>70 seconds (sec), Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR): \<0.8; \>1.1. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=137 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=135 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation
aPTT: >70 sec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation
Prothrombin INR: <0.8
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation
Prothrombin INR: >1.1
|
46 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in serum chemistry values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (serum chemistry): Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): \>3\*upper limit of normal (ULN), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP): \>3\*ULN and 25% increase (inc) from baseline (BL), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): \>3\* ULN, Bilirubin: \>=1.5\* ULN, Blood Urea Nitrogen: \>=10.7 mg/dL, Calcium: \<=1.8 mg/dL; \>=3.9 mg/dL, Chloride: \<=90 mmol/L; \>=115 mmol/L, Creatinine: \>=177 mg/dL, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: \>3\*ULN, Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): \<30 mL/min, Glucose: \<=2.8 mg/dL; \>=10 mg/dL, Potassium: \<=3.0 mmol/L; \>=5.8 mmol/L, Sodium: \<=130 mmol/L; \>=155 mmol/L. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=137 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo.
n=135 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
ALT: >3*ULN
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Blood Urea Nitrogen: >=10.7 mg/dL
|
8 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Calcium: <=1.8 mg/dL
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Calcium: >=3.9 mg/dL
|
9 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Chloride: <=90 mmol/L
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Chloride: >=115 mmol/L
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Creatinine: >=177 mg/dL
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: >3*ULN
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
GFR: <30 mL/min
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Glucose: <=2.8 mg/dL
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Glucose: >=10 mg/dL
|
11 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Potassium: <=3.0 mmol/L
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Potassium: >=5.8 mmol/L
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Sodium: <=130 mmol/L
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Sodium: >=155 mmol/L
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
ALP: >3*ULN & 25% inc from BL
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
AST: >3*ULN
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Bilirubin: >=1.5*ULN
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Mesalamine
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=137 participants at risk
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo
n=135 participants at risk
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.73%
1/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.73%
1/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
0.00%
0/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ecthyma
|
0.00%
0/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=137 participants at risk
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
Placebo
n=135 participants at risk
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
|
0.73%
1/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
3.7%
5/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
2.9%
4/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
2.9%
4/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Investigations
Faecal calprotectin increased
|
2.2%
3/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
10.2%
14/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
14.8%
20/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
|
2.2%
3/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review the draft manuscript prior to publication and can request delay of publication where any contents are deemed patentable by the sponsor or confidential to the sponsor. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the draft manuscript. Additional time may be required to allow Ferring to seek patent protection of the invention.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER