Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mesalamine 2 g Sachet for the Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis (UC) (NCT NCT02522780)

NCT ID: NCT02522780

Last Updated: 2021-11-08

Results Overview

The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

276 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Month 6

Results posted on

2021-11-08

Participant Flow

A total of 50 sites in 10 countries randomized subjects to this trial between February 2016 to April 2018, the last subject completed last visit in September 2018. Of 403 subjects screened, 276 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either mesalamine or placebo group (138 subjects each), for 6 months.

Of 276 subjects, (a) 53 were rolled-over from Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) who achieved remission after 8-weeks double-blind treatment with placebo (Pathway 1a; 4 subjects) or mesalamine (Pathway 1b; 10 subjects), or an additional 8-weeks open-label treatment with mesalamine (Pathway 2; 39 subjects), and (b) 223 subjects were de novo (Pathway 3).

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Mesalamine
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally once daily (QD) for 6 months.
Placebo
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Overall Study
STARTED
138
138
Overall Study
Treated
137
135
Overall Study
Intention-to-treat (ITT) Population
136
136
Overall Study
COMPLETED
121
111
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
17
27

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Mesalamine
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally once daily (QD) for 6 months.
Placebo
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Overall Study
Consent withdrawn by subject
5
7
Overall Study
Protocol deviation
1
3
Overall Study
Subject refused endoscopic procedure
0
1
Overall Study
Adverse event, non-fatal
11
16

Baseline Characteristics

Mesalamine 2 g Sachet for the Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Total
n=272 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
130 Participants
n=5 Participants
126 Participants
n=7 Participants
256 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.50 • n=5 Participants
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.65 • n=7 Participants
43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.67 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
77 Participants
n=7 Participants
147 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
130 Participants
n=5 Participants
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
257 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
130 Participants
n=5 Participants
130 Participants
n=7 Participants
260 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Body Mass Index
24.56 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.812 • n=5 Participants
24.89 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.657 • n=7 Participants
24.73 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.729 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6
82 Participants
67 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 2, 4, and 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

The proportion of subjects in clinical remission was defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 for stool frequency based on clinical response score component of the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score. Clinical response score component had two subscales to assess subject's symptoms: rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes) and stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal). The scores of clinical response component ranged from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 2
122 Participants
116 Participants
Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 4
113 Participants
113 Participants
Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 6
96 Participants
89 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Time from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy (up to 6 months)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

Time to relapse was defined as the number of days from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Time to Relapse
NA days
Median and 95% confidence interval (CI) was not estimable due to insufficient events to meet the threshold for 50% on the Kaplan-Meier curve.
NA days
Median and 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient events to meet the threshold for 50% on the Kaplan-Meier curve.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

The proportion of subjects with an increase from baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or more points in at least 1 component, or by 1 or more points in at least 2 components were reported. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical Response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic Response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6
14 Participants
30 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

The adjusted mean change from baseline in serum CRP levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 2
0.8 mg/L
Standard Deviation 4.76
2.2 mg/L
Standard Deviation 15.63
Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 4
1.0 mg/L
Standard Deviation 5.69
0.9 mg/L
Standard Deviation 5.53
Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 6
0.8 mg/L
Standard Deviation 3.67
2.5 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.66

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

The adjusted mean change from baseline in fecal calprotectin levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 2
-94.8 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 553.00
12.8 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 509.70
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 4
-41.7 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 533.02
53.6 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 581.64
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Month 6
-43.5 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 553.13
36.4 mcg/g
Standard Deviation 559.98

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult subjects with ulcerative colitis. It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Subjects were asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). The total IBDQ was computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. The adjusted mean change from baseline at Month 2, 4, and 6 for the IBDQ total scores were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=136 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=136 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6
Month 2
-1.3 points on a score
Standard Deviation 17.78
-0.4 points on a score
Standard Deviation 20.00
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6
Month 4
-0.6 points on a score
Standard Deviation 20.40
-0.3 points on a score
Standard Deviation 18.53
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6
Month 6
-0.5 points on a score
Standard Deviation 24.80
-1.2 points on a score
Standard Deviation 23.44

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Month 6

Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set which included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical trial. Any AEs includes serious as well as non-serious AEs. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. Any AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (investigational medicinal product \[IMP\] intake) to the end of treatment visit (Month 6) was considered treatment-emergent. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=137 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=135 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Any Treatment-Emergent AEs
42 Participants
49 Participants
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Treatment-Emergent SAEs
2 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Month 6

Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set.

The number of subjects with intensity of AEs (classified as mild, moderate or severe) were presented. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=137 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=135 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Severity of Adverse Events
Mild
32 Participants
32 Participants
Severity of Adverse Events
Moderate
18 Participants
22 Participants
Severity of Adverse Events
Severe
2 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.

Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in hematology values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (Hematology): Basophils/Leukocytes: \>=5%, Eosinophils/Leukocytes: \>=10%, Erythrocytes: \<=3.5\*10\^6/μL, Hematocrit: \<=0.32%; \>=0.56%, Hemoglobin: \<=11.5 g/dL, Leukocytes: \<=2.8\*10\^3/μL; \>=16.0\*10\^3/μL, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: \<=10%; \>=80%, Monocytes/Leukocytes: \>=20%, Neutrophils/Leukocytes: \<=15%; \>=90%, Platelets: \<=75\*10\^3/μL; \>=700\*10\^3/μL. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=137 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=135 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Hemoglobin: <=11.5 g/dL
29 Participants
23 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Basophils/Leukocytes: >=5%
0 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Eosinophils/Leukocytes: >=10%
3 Participants
7 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Erythrocytes: <=3.5*10^6/μL
2 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Hematocrit: <=0.32%
1 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Hematocrit: >=0.56%
8 Participants
12 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Leukocytes: <=2.8*10^3/μL
4 Participants
4 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Leukocytes: >=16.0*10^3/μL
2 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: <=10%
3 Participants
4 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: >=80%
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Monocytes/Leukocytes: >=20%
0 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Neutrophils/Leukocytes: <=15%
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Neutrophils/Leukocytes: >=90%
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Platelets: <=75*10^3/μL
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Platelets: >=700*10^3/μL
1 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.

Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in coagulation values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (coagulation): Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT): \>70 seconds (sec), Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR): \<0.8; \>1.1. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=137 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=135 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation
aPTT: >70 sec
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation
Prothrombin INR: <0.8
0 Participants
2 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation
Prothrombin INR: >1.1
46 Participants
54 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6

Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.

Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in serum chemistry values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (serum chemistry): Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): \>3\*upper limit of normal (ULN), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP): \>3\*ULN and 25% increase (inc) from baseline (BL), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): \>3\* ULN, Bilirubin: \>=1.5\* ULN, Blood Urea Nitrogen: \>=10.7 mg/dL, Calcium: \<=1.8 mg/dL; \>=3.9 mg/dL, Chloride: \<=90 mmol/L; \>=115 mmol/L, Creatinine: \>=177 mg/dL, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: \>3\*ULN, Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): \<30 mL/min, Glucose: \<=2.8 mg/dL; \>=10 mg/dL, Potassium: \<=3.0 mmol/L; \>=5.8 mmol/L, Sodium: \<=130 mmol/L; \>=155 mmol/L. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mesalamine
n=137 Participants
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo.
n=135 Participants
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
ALT: >3*ULN
1 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Blood Urea Nitrogen: >=10.7 mg/dL
8 Participants
11 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Calcium: <=1.8 mg/dL
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Calcium: >=3.9 mg/dL
9 Participants
12 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Chloride: <=90 mmol/L
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Chloride: >=115 mmol/L
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Creatinine: >=177 mg/dL
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: >3*ULN
6 Participants
4 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
GFR: <30 mL/min
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Glucose: <=2.8 mg/dL
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Glucose: >=10 mg/dL
11 Participants
14 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Potassium: <=3.0 mmol/L
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Potassium: >=5.8 mmol/L
0 Participants
2 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Sodium: <=130 mmol/L
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Sodium: >=155 mmol/L
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
ALP: >3*ULN & 25% inc from BL
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
AST: >3*ULN
2 Participants
2 Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Bilirubin: >=1.5*ULN
8 Participants
5 Participants

Adverse Events

Mesalamine

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 23 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 28 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Mesalamine
n=137 participants at risk
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo
n=135 participants at risk
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.73%
1/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.73%
1/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
0.00%
0/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
Infections and infestations
Ecthyma
0.00%
0/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.00%
0/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Mesalamine
n=137 participants at risk
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Placebo
n=135 participants at risk
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Investigations
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
0.73%
1/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
3.7%
5/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
2.9%
4/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
2.9%
4/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
Investigations
Faecal calprotectin increased
2.2%
3/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
10.2%
14/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
14.8%
20/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
2.2%
3/137 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Month 6
Treatment-Emergent AEs were defined as AEs which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.

Additional Information

Clinical Development Support

Ferring Pharmaceuticals

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review the draft manuscript prior to publication and can request delay of publication where any contents are deemed patentable by the sponsor or confidential to the sponsor. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the draft manuscript. Additional time may be required to allow Ferring to seek patent protection of the invention.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER