Use of Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Block Prior to Hydrodistention for the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome (IC/PBS)
NCT ID: NCT02517996
Last Updated: 2019-07-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-02-28
2018-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment for Acute Postoperative Voiding Dysfunction
NCT01189136
Pilot Study of Percutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of IC/PBS
NCT02550561
Clinical Efficacy of Changing the InterStim® Parameters in Patients With Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome
NCT01312259
Trial of Maintenance Therapy With Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder
NCT00912314
Physical Therapy in Women With Interstitial Cystitis
NCT00733603
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The pudendal nerve is a peripheral nerve that is mainly composed of afferent sensory fibers from sacral nerve roots S1, S2, and S3 and consequently it is a major contributor to bladder afferent regulation and bladder function. Pudendal nerve entrapment often leads to significant voiding dysfunction including urinary incontinence and over active bladder syndrome Furthermore, because the pudendal nerve carries such a large percentage of afferent fibers, it has been an attractive target for neuromodulation in treating refractory overactive bladder and may be useful for modulating pain experienced in IC/PBS.
No treatment has been consistently shown to provide relief in the majority of patients with painful bladder syndrome. Furthermore, combination treatment modalities are needed in the majority of patients. Cystoscopy with hydrodistention is thought to be a useful therapeutic tool in patients who are unresponsive to therapies like medication and pelvic floor physical therapy; however, its use has only been studied in a few observational studies and is currently listed as a third line treatment option for IC/PBS. According to the interstitial cystitis database study experience cystoscopy with hydrodistention is reported to be the most commonly used treatment modality for IC/PBS and published studies have reported improvement in symptoms in 70 to 80 percent of patients while other studies have reported improvement in only 40 percent. It has been postulated that hydrodistention works by disrupting the sensory nerves within the bladder that may be contributing to bladder pain and enabling the regeneration of afferent sensory nerves. Though the exact mechanism of action is unclear, there is ample evidence to suggest the efficacy of cystoscopy with hydrodistention, in a recent study by Chien-Ying et al, therapeutic hydrodistension was associated with an increase in bladder capacity and significant reduction in average O'Leary- Sant symptom and problem scores after treatment. In addition, Aihara et al who determined a positive therapeutic outcome in 71% of patients 1 month after hydrodistention have reported similar findings. The disadvantages of hydrodistention are that some patients experience a temporary worsening of their symptoms immediately following the procedure and any beneficial effect often lasts between 2-6 weeks. The immediate worsening of bladder symptoms immediately after hydrodistention and its relatively short duration of effect are often deterrents to recommending this therapy to patients. Given the multimodal approach to managing patients with IC/PBS it is imperative that the investigators explore ways to prolong the efficacy of available options and one approach that has been recently suggested is the use of preemptive analgesia.
In 1983, Woolf proposed that persistent pain experienced after trauma or surgery is due to posttraumatic functional changes not only in the peripheral pain receptors but also in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord a property known as hyperexcitability. The hyperexcitable state persists long after such stimuli cease, causing the patient to perceive pain from stimuli normally believed to be painless a common occurrence thought to be seen in patients with IC/PBS. Therefore, prevention of spinal hyperexcitability by blockade of the afferent nerve pathway from surgical site to spinal cord may therefore decrease the amount and duration of postoperative pain perception. This theory has been tested in various animal studies and was first described by Wall in 1988. In addition, the current literature on preemptive analgesia in gynecology is supportive of this approach. In a study by Ismail et al, 130 patients undergoing posterior colporrhaphy were randomized to receive preemptive pudendal nerve block with either .25% bupivacaine or normal saline. Study findings demonstrated an average postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 51.1 for the bupivacaine group compared to 23.5 in the placebo group. The investigators postulate that since the pudendal nerve is an important contributor to bladder afferent regulation, preemptive nerve block prior to hydrodistention may block afferent impulse transmission to the spinal cord and decrease the initial increase in postoperative bladder pain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1% Lidocaine
Patients randomized in this arm will receive preemptive bilateral pudendal nerve block with 20 cubic centimeters 1% lidocaine after anesthesia induction.
Lidocaine
Total 20cc (10cc bilateral) of 1% Lidocaine: Lidocaine is a commonly used anesthetic agent suitable for infiltration, block and surface anesthesia. It is characterized by a rapid onset of action, intermediate duration of efficacy, and its elimination half-life is 90-120 minutes. Lidocaine alters signal conduction in neurons by blocking the fast voltage gated sodium (Na) channels in the neuronal cell membrane that are responsible for signal propagation. With sufficient blockage the membrane of the postsynaptic neuron will not depolarize and will thus fail to transmit an action potential. This creates the anesthetic effect by not merely preventing pain signals from propagating to the brain but by stopping them before they begin. Adverse drug reactions are rare when lidocaine is used as a local anesthetic and when administered correctly.
Normal Saline
Patients randomized in this arm will receive preemptive bilateral pudendal nerve block with 20 cubic centimeters normal saline after anesthesia induction.
Placebo
Patients randomized in this arm will receive preemptive bilateral pudendal nerve block with 20 cubic centimeters normal saline after anesthesia induction.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidocaine
Total 20cc (10cc bilateral) of 1% Lidocaine: Lidocaine is a commonly used anesthetic agent suitable for infiltration, block and surface anesthesia. It is characterized by a rapid onset of action, intermediate duration of efficacy, and its elimination half-life is 90-120 minutes. Lidocaine alters signal conduction in neurons by blocking the fast voltage gated sodium (Na) channels in the neuronal cell membrane that are responsible for signal propagation. With sufficient blockage the membrane of the postsynaptic neuron will not depolarize and will thus fail to transmit an action potential. This creates the anesthetic effect by not merely preventing pain signals from propagating to the brain but by stopping them before they begin. Adverse drug reactions are rare when lidocaine is used as a local anesthetic and when administered correctly.
Placebo
Patients randomized in this arm will receive preemptive bilateral pudendal nerve block with 20 cubic centimeters normal saline after anesthesia induction.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* who are literate,
* English speaking and
* can provide written informed consent will be included in this study.
Exclusion Criteria
* In addition, patients who have coagulation disorders will also be excluded as this may increase their risks of complication from bleeding.
* Patient will also be excluded if they have a history of dementia as this may impair their ability to follow instructions.
* Patients who are non-ambulatory and who have an inability to fully assess pain will also be excluded.
* Patients receiving additional surgical procedures will be excluded from the study, as the source of their pain may be difficult to decipher in the immediate post-operative period.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tola Fashokun, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hanno PM, Burks DA, Clemens JQ, Dmochowski RR, Erickson D, Fitzgerald MP, Forrest JB, Gordon B, Gray M, Mayer RD, Newman D, Nyberg L Jr, Payne CK, Wesselmann U, Faraday MM; Interstitial Cystitis Guidelines Panel of the American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. AUA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2162-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.064. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
De Groat WC. Nervous control of the urinary bladder of the cat. Brain Res. 1975 Apr 11;87(2-3):201-11. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90417-5. No abstract available.
GARRY RC, ROBERTS TD, TODD JK. Reflexes involving the external urethral sphincter in the cat. J Physiol. 1959 Dec;149(3):653-65. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006366. No abstract available.
Birder L, de Groat W, Mills I, Morrison J, Thor K, Drake M. Neural control of the lower urinary tract: peripheral and spinal mechanisms. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):128-39. doi: 10.1002/nau.20837.
Kuo YC, Kuo HC. The urodynamic characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Sep;67(9):863-9. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12116.
Malykhina AP. Neural mechanisms of pelvic organ cross-sensitization. Neuroscience. 2007 Nov 9;149(3):660-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.07.053. Epub 2007 Sep 8.
Pezzone MA, Liang R, Fraser MO. A model of neural cross-talk and irritation in the pelvis: implications for the overlap of chronic pelvic pain disorders. Gastroenterology. 2005 Jun;128(7):1953-64. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.008.
Bruns TM, Weber DJ, Gaunt RA. Microstimulation of afferents in the sacral dorsal root ganglia can evoke reflex bladder activity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Jan;34(1):65-71. doi: 10.1002/nau.22514. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
Tai C, Wang J, Wang X, de Groat WC, Roppolo JR. Bladder inhibition or voiding induced by pudendal nerve stimulation in chronic spinal cord injured cats. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(4):570-577. doi: 10.1002/nau.20374.
McGee MJ, Grill WM. Selective co-stimulation of pudendal afferents enhances bladder activation and improves voiding efficiency. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Nov;33(8):1272-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.22474. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
Possover M, Forman A. Voiding Dysfunction Associated with Pudendal Nerve Entrapment. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2012 Dec;7(4):281-285. doi: 10.1007/s11884-012-0156-5. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
Peters KM, Killinger KA, Boguslawski BM, Boura JA. Chronic pudendal neuromodulation: expanding available treatment options for refractory urologic symptoms. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Sep;29(7):1267-71. doi: 10.1002/nau.20823.
Wang S, Zhang S, Zhao L. Long-term efficacy of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation for urgency-frequency syndrome in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):397-402. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2223-7. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
Rovner E, Propert KJ, Brensinger C, Wein AJ, Foy M, Kirkemo A, Landis JR, Kusek JW, Nyberg LM. Treatments used in women with interstitial cystitis: the interstitial cystitis data base (ICDB) study experience. The Interstitial Cystitis Data Base Study Group. Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):940-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00845-1.
Ottem DP, Teichman JM. What is the value of cystoscopy with hydrodistension for interstitial cystitis? Urology. 2005 Sep;66(3):494-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.011.
Wu, C. Y., Chen, I., & Tong, Y. C. (2013). Long-term treatment outcomes in patients with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome: 10-year experience in NCKUH. Urological Science, 24(1), 10-13
Aihara K, Hirayama A, Tanaka N, Fujimoto K, Yoshida K, Hirao Y. Hydrodistension under local anesthesia for patients with suspected painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: safety, diagnostic potential and therapeutic efficacy. Int J Urol. 2009 Dec;16(12):947-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02396.x.
Davis NF, Brady CM, Creagh T. Interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology and evidence-based treatment options. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Apr;175:30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.041. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
Hsieh CH, Chang ST, Hsieh CJ, Hsu CS, Kuo TC, Chang HC, Lin YH. Treatment of interstitial cystitis with hydrodistention and bladder training. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Oct;19(10):1379-84. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0640-9. Epub 2008 May 22.
Yamada T, Murayama T, Andoh M. Adjuvant hydrodistension under epidural anesthesia for interstitial cystitis. Int J Urol. 2003 Sep;10(9):463-8; discussion 469. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2003.00664.x.
Cole EE, Scarpero HM, Dmochowski RR. Are patient symptoms predictive of the diagnostic and/or therapeutic value of hydrodistention? Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(7):638-42. doi: 10.1002/nau.20200.
Erickson DR, Kunselman AR, Bentley CM, Peters KM, Rovner ES, Demers LM, Wheeler MA, Keay SK. Changes in urine markers and symptoms after bladder distention for interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):556-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.029.
Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983 Dec 15-21;306(5944):686-8. doi: 10.1038/306686a0.
Ke RW, Portera SG, Bagous W, Lincoln SR. A randomized, double-blinded trial of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Dec;92(6):972-5. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00303-2.
Ismail MT, Elshmaa NS. Pre-emptive analgesia by nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block for posterior colpoperineorrhaphy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Aug;163(2):200-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.032. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
Long JB, Eiland RJ, Hentz JG, Mergens PA, Magtibay PM, Kho RM, Magrina JF, Cornella JL. Randomized trial of preemptive local analgesia in vaginal surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jan;20(1):5-10. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0716-6. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
Wolfe JW, Butterworth JF. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: update on mechanisms and treatment. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;24(5):561-6. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834a9394.
DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stiff JL. The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jan;86(1):102-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199801000-00020.
Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997 Aug;72(1-2):95-7. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00005-5.
Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8.
O'Leary MP, Sant GR, Fowler FJ Jr, Whitmore KE, Spolarich-Kroll J. The interstitial cystitis symptom index and problem index. Urology. 1997 May;49(5A Suppl):58-63. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80333-1.
Brewer ME, White WM, Klein FA, Klein LM, Waters WB. Validity of Pelvic Pain, Urgency, and Frequency questionnaire in patients with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Urology. 2007 Oct;70(4):646-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1089. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
Parsons CL, Dell J, Stanford EJ, Bullen M, Kahn BS, Waxell T, Koziol JA. Increased prevalence of interstitial cystitis: previously unrecognized urologic and gynecologic cases identified using a new symptom questionnaire and intravesical potassium sensitivity. Urology. 2002 Oct;60(4):573-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01829-0.
Lowenstein L, Zimmer EZ, Deutsch M, Paz Y, Yaniv D, Jakobi P. Preoperative analgesia with local lidocaine infiltration for abdominal hysterectomy pain management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Feb;136(2):239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.11.008. Epub 2006 Dec 18.
O'Neal MG, Beste T, Shackelford DP. Utility of preemptive local analgesia in vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1539-41; discussion 1541-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.691.
Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1999 Apr;79(2):231-52. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70381-9.
Katz J, McCartney CJ. Current status of preemptive analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002 Aug;15(4):435-41. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200208000-00005.
Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK. From preemptive to preventive analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Oct;19(5):551-5. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000245283.45529.f9.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00034476
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.