Renal Nerves Stimulation Study

NCT ID: NCT02496117

Last Updated: 2020-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-14

Study Completion Date

2019-07-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study design: Investigator initiated, single centre, feasibility study

Main objectives are twofold:

1. To investigate the feasibility of RNS in patients with therapy resistant hypertension, which is assessing the functional distribution of renal nerves using 3D imaging and differential pacing modalities.
2. To investigate the blood pressure responses and cardiac excitable properties to RNS, and subsequently perform a RDN procedure, guided by 3D mapping by two different techniques e.g. RNS-checked RDN and RNS-guided RDN procedures.

Study population: 40 patients (18 - 80 yr old)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Approximately 10-15% of adults with hypertension are considered to be treatment resistant because their hypertension is uncontrolled despite taking three or more drugs that includes a diuretic. Renal denervation (RDN) is a novel treatment option for therapy resistant hypertension and its rationale originates in denervating the renal sympathetic efferent and afferent coupling with the central autonomic nervous system. By denervating the renal arteries, general sympathetic tone is reduced. Currently, RDN is performed by placing in a spiral pattern 5-6 ablation lesions in each renal artery. 15-30% of the patients do not have any benefit from this procedure. The reason for this is unknown. Experimental data show that renal nerve stimulation (RNS) may serve as a functional endpoint to assess completeness of the RDN procedure. A RNS-guided RDN may prove to be superior to standard RDN (RNS-checked) in blood pressure control.

Main objectives are twofold:

1. To investigate the feasibility of RNS in patients with therapy resistant hypertension, which is assessing the functional distribution of renal nerves using 3D imaging and differential pacing modalities.
2. To investigate the blood pressure responses and cardiac excitable properties to RNS, and subsequently perform a RDN procedure, guided by 3D mapping by two different techniques e.g. RNS-checked RDN and RNS-guided RDN procedures.

Secondary objective:

The secondary objective is to compare both techniques (RNS-checked vs. RNS-guided) in terms of efficacy and safety.

Hypotheses:

* We hypothesize that identification and localization of the sympathetic nerve bundles using 3D navigation systems and selective pacing manoeuvres will allow a functional approach to denervate the kidneys and improve the success rate of this procedure in patients with hypertension.
* We hypothesize that the RNS-guided RDN procedure will show better blood pressure data during follow up, since the completeness has been assessed in contrast to the RNS-checked RDN procedure.

Study design: Investigator initiated, single centre, prospective, feasibility study

Study population: 40 patients (18 - 80 yr old)

* 20 patients treated with RNS-checked RDN
* 20 patients treated with RNS-guided RDN

Intervention:

Two different techniques will be used in this trial:

1. RNS-checked RDN
2. RNS-guided RDN

Main study endpoints:

Main study parameter will be the arterial blood pressure response to RNS prior to RDN and absence of blood pressure rise in response to pacing in the renal artery after RDN.

Secondary study endpoints:

Blood pressure at 3, 6, 12 months after the intervention, and change in blood pressure compared to measurement before the intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension Renal Denervation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

RNS checked RDN
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

RNS guided RDN

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RNS-checked RDN

20 patients with hypertension will be enrolled undergoing RNS-checked RDN

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Electrical mapping, nerve stimulation checked renal denervation procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

RNS-guided RDN

20 patients with hypertension will be enrolled undergoing RNS-guided RDN

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Electrial mapping, nerve stimulation guided renal denervation procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electrical mapping, nerve stimulation checked renal denervation procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Electrial mapping, nerve stimulation guided renal denervation procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

RNS-checked RDN RNS-guided RDN

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol and has provided written informed consent.
* Age 18-80 years
* The patient has hypertension and is accepted for renal denervation or combined pulmonary bein isolation and renal denervation
* Glomerular filtration rate \>45 mL/min
* No history of renal artery stenosis

Exclusion Criteria

* Type 1 diabetes mellitus
* Contraindication to chronic anticoagulation therapy or heparin.
* Chronic oxygen use
* Primary pulmonary hypertension
* Woman currently pregnant or breastfeeding or not using reliable contraceptive measures during fertile age.
* Known secondary cause of hypertension
* Mental or physical inability to participate in the study.
* Renal artery stenosis \>50% of the arterial lumen, or renal artery lumen ≤3 mm.
* Dual or triple ipsilateral renal artery ostia.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Diagram B.V.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

A. Elvan

Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hoogerwaard AF, Adiyaman A, de Jong MR, Smit JJ, Heeg JE, van Hasselt BAAM, Elvan A. Renal nerve stimulation: complete versus incomplete renal sympathetic denervation. Blood Press. 2021 Dec;30(6):376-385. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2021.1982376. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34647513 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

9209

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.