The Dutch National Renal Denervation Registry

NCT ID: NCT02482103

Last Updated: 2015-06-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2020-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a national registry of patients treated with renal denervation (RD) in the Netherlands.

The aim of the study is to collect data on safety of the procedure, predictors of the blood pressure lowering effect, sustainability of the effect and to assess the cardiovascular event rate in patients treated with renal denervation.

This is a prospective observational study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypertension is common and one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Therefore, it is a major societal and economic health problem. A substantial proportion (20-40%) of the treated hypertensive patients has sub-optimal blood pressure control despite the use of multiple drugs. All these patients have an increased cardio-vascular risk. Furthermore, the use of multiple drugs diminishes compliance to treatment, and increases the risk of side effects. This underscores the need for new approaches for hypertension management. Elevated (renal) sympathetic nerve activity contributes importantly to the development of hypertension and subsequent vascular risk. Deliberate disruption of sympathetic nerve activity (sympatholytic therapy) leads to improvement of vascular outcome through blood pressure dependent and blood pressure independent effects. Recently, a promising novel sympatholytic approach has been introduced, i.e. catheter-based renal denervation in a small clinical trial with resistant hypertensive patients. Many clinical centres have now started to perform this procedure or are in the process to start up.

The Dutch Minister of Health has decided to allow renal denervation in patients with so called resistant hypertension, and "conditional reimbursement" is available starting Jan 1st 2013 for a maximum of 4 years. The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) has provided us with a grant to perform a randomized trial (SYMPATHY) to evaluate the effect on blood pressure at 6 months after intervention. Maximum follow-up in this trial will be 2 years. Important limitations of this study are, firstly that that follow-up is limited to 2 years after renal denervation. Secondly, not all patients that undergo renal denervation, will participate in the abovementioned trial. The Dutch National Renal Denervation Registry will complement the information from the trial in several aspects. These deal with safety, non-responders, and sustainability.

Objectives of the national database are to collect data that will deliver information on:

Safety:

1. What are the short and long term procedural related complications?

Responders
2. What are the predictors for the effect on blood pressure, in particular patient related factors and procedural related factors?
3. Are there differences between the various renal denervation devices?

Sustainability
4. What is the effect on blood pressure after (3), 6, (9), 12, (18), 24, (30), 36, and 60 months and thereafter in patients who are considered eligible based on the judgement of the treating physician?
5. What is the effect on kidney function after (3), 6, (9), 12, (18), 24, (30), 36, and 60 months and thereafter in patients who are considered eligible based on the judgement of the treating physician?
6. What are the cardiovascular events rates in this population, in strata of achieved blood pressure level, and potentially compared with other populations.

Methods:

With this database a nationwide cohort is build comprising patients treated with renal denervation over the years, with uniform baseline data collection and uniform follow-up measurements in terms of safety measurements, blood pressure measurements, hospitalisations, cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality. The data collection will occur through a web-based data entry application. All centers in the Netherlands that perform renal denervation will be asked to participate. All patients who underwent renal denervation should be included, irrespective of the reason and device used.

To address the outstanding research questions specific statistical analyses plans will be applied.

Conclusion:

Our expected results are:

1. to be able to identify patients characteristics, which are associated with a high probability of a favourable blood pressure response to renal denervation,
2. to provide short-and long-term (24 -60 months) side effects of renal denervation

Perspective:

These results, collected in routine clinical practice in a large number of clinics in the Netherlands, will have a major impact on the treatment of 'resistant hypertension'. The safety and efficacy data will pave the way for formal cost-effectiveness analyses. The data have the potential to be of high relevance to decision and policy makers in the government and health insurances. When deemed cost-effective and safe, this approach will be widely used in the treatment of 'resistant hypertension' and will revolutionise the treatment of these patients. Furthermore, it will open ways for evaluation of other groups of patients characterized by a high sympathetic tone; in particular patients with less severe hypertension, heart failure and chronic kidney disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients treated with renal denervation

Patients treated with RD in the Netherlands. The decision to perform RD was made by the treating physician in the participating hospitals.

Renal denervation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Catheter based renal nerve ablation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Renal denervation

Catheter based renal nerve ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* treated with renal denervation. The decision to perform the procedure was made by the treating physician in the participating hospitals

Exclusion Criteria

* below age of 18 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dutch Kidney Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michiel L. Bots

Professor of Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michiel L. Bots, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UMC Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Michiel Bots, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michiel L. Bots, Prof.

Role: primary

+31(88)7559352

Peter J. Blankestijn, MD, PhD

Role: backup

+31(88)7557329

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vink EE, Bots ML, Blankestijn PJ. Renal denervation as therapy for hypertension: potentials and unanswered questions. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):980-91. doi: 10.1177/2047487312473019. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23610453 (View on PubMed)

Verloop WL, Vink EE, Spiering W, Blankestijn PJ, Doevendans PA, Bots ML, Vonken EJ, Voskuil M, Leiner T. Effects of renal denervation on end organ damage in hypertensive patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 May;22(5):558-67. doi: 10.1177/2047487314556003. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25326543 (View on PubMed)

Vink EE, Verloop WL, Bost RB, Voskuil M, Spiering W, Vonken EJ, Bots ML, Blankestijn PJ. The blood pressure-lowering effect of renal denervation is inversely related to kidney function. J Hypertens. 2014 Oct;32(10):2045-53; discussion 2053. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000282.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25023158 (View on PubMed)

Verloop WL, Vink EE, Spiering W, Blankestijn PJ, Doevendans PA, Bots ML, Vonken EJ, Voskuil M. Renal denervation in multiple renal arteries. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014 Aug;44(8):728-35. doi: 10.1111/eci.12289.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24931208 (View on PubMed)

Verloop WL, Vink EE, Voskuil M, Vonken EJ, Rookmaaker MB, Bots ML, Doevendans PA, Blankestijn PJ, Spiering W. Eligibility for percutaneous renal denervation: the importance of a systematic screening. J Hypertens. 2013 Aug;31(8):1662-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328362152e.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23743806 (View on PubMed)

Persu A, Jin Y, Baelen M, Vink E, Verloop WL, Schmidt B, Blicher MK, Severino F, Wuerzner G, Taylor A, Pechere-Bertschi A, Jokhaji F, Fadl Elmula FE, Rosa J, Czarnecka D, Ehret G, Kahan T, Renkin J, Widimsky J Jr, Jacobs L, Spiering W, Burnier M, Mark PB, Menne J, Olsen MH, Blankestijn PJ, Kjeldsen S, Bots ML, Staessen JA; European Network Coordinating research on REnal Denervation Consortium. Eligibility for renal denervation: experience at 11 European expert centers. Hypertension. 2014 Jun;63(6):1319-25. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03194. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24664290 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL-RDN_REG

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.