Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-04-30
2020-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study is to collect data on safety of the procedure, predictors of the blood pressure lowering effect, sustainability of the effect and to assess the cardiovascular event rate in patients treated with renal denervation.
This is a prospective observational study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Renal Sympathetic Denervation as a New Treatment for Therapy Resistant Hypertension
NCT01850901
The Effect of Renal Denervation on Biological Variables
NCT01427049
The Effect of Renal Denervation on Renal Flow in Humans
NCT01848314
Renal Nerves Stimulation Study
NCT02496117
Reintervention-study After Previous Renal Denervation in Non-responding Patients With Severe Hypertension
NCT01834118
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Dutch Minister of Health has decided to allow renal denervation in patients with so called resistant hypertension, and "conditional reimbursement" is available starting Jan 1st 2013 for a maximum of 4 years. The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) has provided us with a grant to perform a randomized trial (SYMPATHY) to evaluate the effect on blood pressure at 6 months after intervention. Maximum follow-up in this trial will be 2 years. Important limitations of this study are, firstly that that follow-up is limited to 2 years after renal denervation. Secondly, not all patients that undergo renal denervation, will participate in the abovementioned trial. The Dutch National Renal Denervation Registry will complement the information from the trial in several aspects. These deal with safety, non-responders, and sustainability.
Objectives of the national database are to collect data that will deliver information on:
Safety:
1. What are the short and long term procedural related complications?
Responders
2. What are the predictors for the effect on blood pressure, in particular patient related factors and procedural related factors?
3. Are there differences between the various renal denervation devices?
Sustainability
4. What is the effect on blood pressure after (3), 6, (9), 12, (18), 24, (30), 36, and 60 months and thereafter in patients who are considered eligible based on the judgement of the treating physician?
5. What is the effect on kidney function after (3), 6, (9), 12, (18), 24, (30), 36, and 60 months and thereafter in patients who are considered eligible based on the judgement of the treating physician?
6. What are the cardiovascular events rates in this population, in strata of achieved blood pressure level, and potentially compared with other populations.
Methods:
With this database a nationwide cohort is build comprising patients treated with renal denervation over the years, with uniform baseline data collection and uniform follow-up measurements in terms of safety measurements, blood pressure measurements, hospitalisations, cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality. The data collection will occur through a web-based data entry application. All centers in the Netherlands that perform renal denervation will be asked to participate. All patients who underwent renal denervation should be included, irrespective of the reason and device used.
To address the outstanding research questions specific statistical analyses plans will be applied.
Conclusion:
Our expected results are:
1. to be able to identify patients characteristics, which are associated with a high probability of a favourable blood pressure response to renal denervation,
2. to provide short-and long-term (24 -60 months) side effects of renal denervation
Perspective:
These results, collected in routine clinical practice in a large number of clinics in the Netherlands, will have a major impact on the treatment of 'resistant hypertension'. The safety and efficacy data will pave the way for formal cost-effectiveness analyses. The data have the potential to be of high relevance to decision and policy makers in the government and health insurances. When deemed cost-effective and safe, this approach will be widely used in the treatment of 'resistant hypertension' and will revolutionise the treatment of these patients. Furthermore, it will open ways for evaluation of other groups of patients characterized by a high sympathetic tone; in particular patients with less severe hypertension, heart failure and chronic kidney disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients treated with renal denervation
Patients treated with RD in the Netherlands. The decision to perform RD was made by the treating physician in the participating hospitals.
Renal denervation
Catheter based renal nerve ablation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Renal denervation
Catheter based renal nerve ablation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dutch Kidney Foundation
OTHER
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michiel L. Bots
Professor of Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michiel L. Bots, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vink EE, Bots ML, Blankestijn PJ. Renal denervation as therapy for hypertension: potentials and unanswered questions. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):980-91. doi: 10.1177/2047487312473019. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
Verloop WL, Vink EE, Spiering W, Blankestijn PJ, Doevendans PA, Bots ML, Vonken EJ, Voskuil M, Leiner T. Effects of renal denervation on end organ damage in hypertensive patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 May;22(5):558-67. doi: 10.1177/2047487314556003. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
Vink EE, Verloop WL, Bost RB, Voskuil M, Spiering W, Vonken EJ, Bots ML, Blankestijn PJ. The blood pressure-lowering effect of renal denervation is inversely related to kidney function. J Hypertens. 2014 Oct;32(10):2045-53; discussion 2053. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000282.
Verloop WL, Vink EE, Spiering W, Blankestijn PJ, Doevendans PA, Bots ML, Vonken EJ, Voskuil M. Renal denervation in multiple renal arteries. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014 Aug;44(8):728-35. doi: 10.1111/eci.12289.
Verloop WL, Vink EE, Voskuil M, Vonken EJ, Rookmaaker MB, Bots ML, Doevendans PA, Blankestijn PJ, Spiering W. Eligibility for percutaneous renal denervation: the importance of a systematic screening. J Hypertens. 2013 Aug;31(8):1662-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328362152e.
Persu A, Jin Y, Baelen M, Vink E, Verloop WL, Schmidt B, Blicher MK, Severino F, Wuerzner G, Taylor A, Pechere-Bertschi A, Jokhaji F, Fadl Elmula FE, Rosa J, Czarnecka D, Ehret G, Kahan T, Renkin J, Widimsky J Jr, Jacobs L, Spiering W, Burnier M, Mark PB, Menne J, Olsen MH, Blankestijn PJ, Kjeldsen S, Bots ML, Staessen JA; European Network Coordinating research on REnal Denervation Consortium. Eligibility for renal denervation: experience at 11 European expert centers. Hypertension. 2014 Jun;63(6):1319-25. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03194. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL-RDN_REG
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.