Biomarkers of Neuropathic Pain in Women Treated for Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02487524

Last Updated: 2024-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

402 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-28

Study Completion Date

2016-04-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Investigators aim to identify the key phenotypes (biological, psychological, genetic) involved in the transition from acute to chronic neuropathic pain (NP) by comparison of the neuropathic pain phenotypes and genomics of patients developing NP or not under similar nerve injury conditions. The cohort is part of a previous prospective study of 1000 patients operated for breast cancer of whom 350 have surgeon defined intercostobrachial nerve resection during operation with or without persistent pain and additional 50 patients with pain, but no nerve resection during operation. Patients fill in questionnaires and a detailed sensory examination, cognitive tests, and a cold water test with autonomic nervous system monitoring are performed during the research visit. A selected group of patients undergo quantitative sensory testing (QST).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This cohort is part of a previous prospective study of 1000 breast cancer operated women. Of these, there are 350 patients with surgeon defined intercostobrachial nerve resection during the operation. Part of the patients have pain, part of them are pain free. In addition the investigators plan to enroll 50 patients with pain, but no nerve resection during operation.

The patients come for a clinical research visit. Beforehand they fill in questionnaires of medical history, pain, mood, temperament, quality of life, and sleeping. After informed consent the patients give a blood sample with prior 12 hour fasting. The investigators present a detailed sensory testing with body maps and patient pain drawings. The investigators perform a cold water test with autonomic nervous system monitoring and conduct a set of cognitive tests, part of them computer based. A selected group of patients undergo QST.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuropathic Pain Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nerve resection with pain

Questionnaires, cognitive tests, sensory examination, cold water test with autonomic nervous system monitoring. QST.

Group Type OTHER

Cold water test

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients immerse their hand into cold water for a maximum of 90 seconds and report their pain intensity every 15 seconds during the test.

Autonomic nervous system monitoring

Intervention Type OTHER

The autonomic nervous system is monitored during the cold water test and 15 minutes thereafter.

QST

Intervention Type OTHER

Quantitative sensory testing.

Nerve resection without pain

Questionnaires, cognitive tests, sensory examination, cold water test with autonomic nervous system monitoring. QST.

Group Type OTHER

Cold water test

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients immerse their hand into cold water for a maximum of 90 seconds and report their pain intensity every 15 seconds during the test.

Autonomic nervous system monitoring

Intervention Type OTHER

The autonomic nervous system is monitored during the cold water test and 15 minutes thereafter.

QST

Intervention Type OTHER

Quantitative sensory testing.

No nerve resection but pain

Questionnaires, cognitive tests, sensory examination, cold water test with autonomic nervous system monitoring. QST.

Group Type OTHER

Cold water test

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients immerse their hand into cold water for a maximum of 90 seconds and report their pain intensity every 15 seconds during the test.

Autonomic nervous system monitoring

Intervention Type OTHER

The autonomic nervous system is monitored during the cold water test and 15 minutes thereafter.

QST

Intervention Type OTHER

Quantitative sensory testing.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cold water test

The patients immerse their hand into cold water for a maximum of 90 seconds and report their pain intensity every 15 seconds during the test.

Intervention Type OTHER

Autonomic nervous system monitoring

The autonomic nervous system is monitored during the cold water test and 15 minutes thereafter.

Intervention Type OTHER

QST

Quantitative sensory testing.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* belongs to the cohort of 1000 breast cancer operated women and has had nerve resection during the operation (with or without pain) or no nerve resection, but pain
* sufficient Finnish language skills

Exclusion Criteria

* age over 75 years
* living far away from study site
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

deCODE genetics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hanna Harno

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eija Kalso, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Helsinki, HUS, Finland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kaunisto MA, Jokela R, Tallgren M, Kambur O, Tikkanen E, Tasmuth T, Sipila R, Palotie A, Estlander AM, Leidenius M, Ripatti S, Kalso EA. Pain in 1,000 women treated for breast cancer: a prospective study of pain sensitivity and postoperative pain. Anesthesiology. 2013 Dec;119(6):1410-21. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24343286 (View on PubMed)

Meretoja TJ, Leidenius MHK, Tasmuth T, Sipila R, Kalso E. Pain at 12 months after surgery for breast cancer. JAMA. 2014 Jan 1;311(1):90-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278795. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24381969 (View on PubMed)

Haanpaa M, Attal N, Backonja M, Baron R, Bennett M, Bouhassira D, Cruccu G, Hansson P, Haythornthwaite JA, Iannetti GD, Jensen TS, Kauppila T, Nurmikko TJ, Rice ASC, Rowbotham M, Serra J, Sommer C, Smith BH, Treede RD. NeuPSIG guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment. Pain. 2011 Jan;152(1):14-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.07.031. Epub 2010 Sep 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20851519 (View on PubMed)

Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, McNicol E, Baron R, Dworkin RH, Gilron I, Haanpaa M, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Kamerman PR, Lund K, Moore A, Raja SN, Rice AS, Rowbotham M, Sena E, Siddall P, Smith BH, Wallace M. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Feb;14(2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70251-0. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25575710 (View on PubMed)

Aho T, Sipila R, Kalso E, Harno H. Temperament and character dimensions differ in chronic post-surgical neuropathic pain and cold pressure pain. Scand J Pain. 2022 Feb 9;22(3):515-525. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0163. Print 2022 Jul 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35139264 (View on PubMed)

Honkanen N, Mustonen L, Kalso E, Meretoja T, Harno H. Breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery - persistent pain and quality of life 1-8 years after breast reconstruction. Scand J Pain. 2021 Jun 7;21(3):522-529. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0026. Print 2021 Jul 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34087967 (View on PubMed)

Sipila R, Kemp H, Harno H, Rice ASC, Kalso E. Health-related quality of life and pain interference in two patient cohorts with neuropathic pain: breast cancer survivors and HIV patients. Scand J Pain. 2021 Mar 17;21(3):512-521. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0177. Print 2021 Jul 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33725747 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

149/13/03/00/14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.