Evaluation of the Information of the Patient Before a Scheduled Coronarography
NCT ID: NCT02484144
Last Updated: 2016-10-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
821 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-07-31
2016-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (EVACORY)
NCT01995955
Evaluation of Myocardial Viability : Dual Energy Cardiac CT vs. Cardiac MRI
NCT02360150
Prognostic Value of Cardial Stress Perfusion Imaging
NCT04564794
Interest of CARE Rule to Exclude the Hypothesis of an Acute Coronary Syndrome Without Bioassay - ICARE
NCT02813499
Hospital Registry of Acute Myocarditis: Evolution of the Proportion of Positive SARS-COV-2 (COVID19) Cases
NCT04375748
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For that purpose, inclusion on one week with comparison of the score obtained during a classic information with delivery of the sheet of information and during a classic information followed by an information more detailed with educational video.
Check during this stage of the significant improvement of the score with the addition of the educational video literally of information and in the oral information supplied usually within the framework of the current care Evaluation of the number of subject included in the 1 week. Stage 2: Comparison of the patient understanding between 2 groups: 1 group received the information by using the information targeted with educational video (modern information) and the other group the classic information considered as the reference.
Inclusion planned over 2 weeks with for every center 1 week of classic information and 1 week of targeted information, allowing a randomized comparison of the 2 methods.
To limit the biases of inclusions and the effect centers, every center will realize 1 week of every method, according to a specific drawing lots in every center to determine with which information (classic or targeted) the study will begin.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patients receive usual information
Patients receive usual information before Scheduled Coronarography
usual information
usual information for coronarography
patients receive modern information
Patients receive usual information and a information by video before Scheduled Coronarography
modern information
information by video for coronarography
usual information
usual information for coronarography
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
modern information
information by video for coronarography
usual information
usual information for coronarography
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients not speaking or not reading French, or having linguistic knowledge not allowing the delivery of an appropriate information
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
French Cardiology Society
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Amiens
Amiens, , France
CHU Jean MINJOZ
Besançon, , France
Chu Avicennes
Bobigny, , France
Chu Brest
Brest, , France
Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel
Bron, , France
Ch Chartres
Chartres, , France
Hôpital Gabriel Montpied
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Chu Mondor
Crétail, , France
CHU Dijon
Dijon, , France
Chu Grenoble
Grenoble, , France
CH Lagny
Jossigny, , France
CH MANS
Le Mans, , France
Chru Lille
Lille, , France
Chu Marseille
Marseille, , France
CH
Mâcon, , France
CH d'ANNECY-GENEVOIS
Metz-Tessy, , France
Groupe intercommunal Le Raincy Montfermeil
Montfermeil, , France
CHRU
Montpellier, , France
CHI André Grégoire
Montreuil, , France
CHU Nord LAENNEC
Nantes, , France
Clinique Ambroise Paré
Neuilly-sur-Seine, , France
Chu Nimes
Nîmes, , France
Chu Pitie Salpetriere
Paris, , France
European Georges Pompidou Hospital
Paris, , France
Bichat
Paris, , France
Chu Ambroise Paré
Paris, , France
CHU Saint Antoine
Paris, , France
Cochin
Paris, , France
Lariboisière
Paris, , France
Ch Perpignan
Perpignan, , France
Hopital Cardiologique Haut Lévèque
Pessac, , France
CHU Poitiers
Poitiers, , France
Chu Reims
Reims, , France
Chu Rennes
Rennes, , France
CH Yves Le FOLL
Saint-Brieuc, , France
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Saint-Denis, , France
Chu Strasbourg
Strasbourg, , France
CHU Toulouse Rangueil
Toulouse, , France
Hôpital Trousseau
Tours, , France
CHRU Nancy
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lattuca B, Barber-Chamoux N, Alos B, Sfaxi A, Mulliez A, Miton N, Levasseur T, Servoz C, Derimay F, Hachet O, Motreff P, Metz D, Lairez O, Mewton N, Belle L, Akodad M, Mathivet T, Ecarnot F, Pollet J, Danchin N, Steg PG, Juilliere Y, Bouleti C; INFOCORO investigators. Impact of video on the understanding and satisfaction of patients receiving informed consent before elective inpatient coronary angiography: A randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Jun;200:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.