Prospective Comparative Study to Compare Safety and Effectiveness of Two Vertebral Compression Fracture Reduction Techniques

NCT ID: NCT02461810

Last Updated: 2019-02-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

152 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2018-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the SpineJack® with the Kyphx Xpander® Inflatable Bone Tamp and support a non-inferiority finding for the use of SpineJack® VCF treatment system versus Balloon Kyphoplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Fractures Vertebral Compression Fractures Back Injuries Osteoporosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SpineJack® system

VCF treatment system Vertebral fracture surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vertebral fracture surgery SpineJack®

Intervention Type DEVICE

Vertebral augmentation for one osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

Balloon Kyphoplasty

VCF treatment system Vertebral fracture surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Balloon Kyphoplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vertebral fracture surgery SpineJack®

Vertebral augmentation for one osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Balloon Kyphoplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or Female with at least 50 years of age
2. 1 painful VCF which at least meet all following criteria:

* Fracture due to diagnosed or presumed underlying osteoporosis
* VCF between T7 and L3
* Fracture age \<3 months
* VCF shows loss of height in the anterior, mid or posterior third of the VB from estimated pre-fracture configuration of at least 15% but not more than 40% based on X-Ray at baseline
* The Index fracture is acute or persistent (not healed), as demonstrated by T2 weighted STIR MRI (or bone scan if patient is contraindicated for MRI)
3. Patient has failed conservative medical therapy, defined as either having a VAS back pain score of ≥50 mm at 6 weeks after initiation of fracture care or a VAS back pain score of ≥70mm at 2 weeks after initiation of fracture care
4. Investigator believes target VB is suitable for SpineJack procedure and Balloon kyphoplasty (e.g., appropriate pedicle diameter) assessed on CT scan pre op
5. Patient has an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of ≥ 30/100
6. Patient is mentally capable and willing to sign a study specific informed consent as documentation of the informed consent process prior to any study procedures
7. The patient is willing and able to comply with all study requirements including follow-up visits and radiographic assessments.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Target VCF due to underlying or suspected tumor
2. Target VCF due to high-energy trauma
3. Target VCF is diagnosed as an osteonecrotic fracture
4. Segmental kyphosis of target VB of \>30°
5. Any prior surgical treatment for a vertebral body compression fracture or other surgical procedure on target VB or adjacent level
6. The patient has uncontrolled diabetes
7. Pre-existing or clinically unstable neurologic deficit
8. The patient has spinal canal compromise causing clinical manifestations of cord, neural foramen, or nerve root compression at the level to be treated
9. Any physical exam evidence of myelopathy or radiculopathy
10. The patient has pain based on clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus or severe spinal stenosis (progressive weakness or paralysis)
11. Patient not able to walk without assistance prior to fracture
12. Any radiographic evidence of pedicle fracture visible on CT scan pre op
13. Spondylolisthesis \>Grade 1 at target VB
14. Any underlying systemic bone disease other than osteoporosis (e.g., osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfect, Paget's disease, etc.)
15. A medical contraindication to spinal surgery and/or general anesthesia, such as coagulopathy and/or taking warfarin (Coumadin) or other anticoagulant on regular basis for coagulopathy (with a threshold for normal being INR≤1.5, PTT within lab normal range, and platelet count \> 100,000)
16. Pain due to any other condition that requires daily narcotic medication
17. Disabling back pain due to causes other than acute fracture
18. History of intolerance or allergic reaction to titanium or acrylic compounds
19. Active systemic or local infection at baseline
20. Body mass index \>40
21. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
22. Any other medical illness or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, is likely to impair long-term follow-up (e.g., cancer) or greatly increase the risk of surgery including but not limited to patients with contraindications for general anesthesia (surgeon expertise)
23. Any evidence of alcohol or drug abuse
24. The patient has uncontrolled psychiatric illness or severe dementia
25. The patient is currently on anti-cancer therapy or anti-HIV therapy
26. Patient's life expectancy is less than the study duration or undergoing palliative care
27. Participating in any other investigational study
28. The patient is on long-term steroid therapy (steroid dose ≥ 30 mg /day for \> 3 months)
29. The patient is known to be involved in medical litigation including Workmen's Compensation
30. Patient with contraindication for MRI
31. The patient is pregnant or considering getting pregnant during study participation.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ACES Ing.-GmbH

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vexim SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marie-Pierre HONTAS, Director Clinical Affairs

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Vexim SA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Jean Minjoz Service Neurochirurgie

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier La Cavale Blanche

Brest, , France

Site Status

CHU La Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Nord

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHU Hôtel Dieu Service Neuro traumatologie

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Klinik und Poliklinik fur Orthopädie Universitatsklinikum

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Loretto-Krankenhaus Freiburg

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Krankenhaus NEUWERK Sankt Augustinus kliniken

Mönchengladbach, , Germany

Site Status

Ospedale SS Trinita ASL8

Cagliari, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid,

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

HFR Fribourg - Hôpital cantonal

Fribourg, , Switzerland

Site Status

Clinique Bois-Cerf

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France Germany Italy Spain Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SAKOS - EU2014-05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.