Prospective Comparative Study to Compare Safety and Effectiveness of Two Vertebral Compression Fracture Reduction Techniques
NCT ID: NCT02461810
Last Updated: 2019-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
152 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2018-02-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Outcomes for Quality of Life and Activities of Daily Living for BKP in the Treatment of VCFs
NCT01871519
FREE Study - Fracture Reduction Evaluation
NCT00211211
SpineJack® Versus Conservative Treatment Study (SPICO Study)
NCT02657265
Unipedicular vs. Bipedicular Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
NCT01383616
KAVIAR Study - Kyphoplasty And Vertebroplasty In the Augmentation and Restoration of Vertebral Body Compression Fractures
NCT00323609
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SpineJack® system
VCF treatment system Vertebral fracture surgery
Vertebral fracture surgery SpineJack®
Vertebral augmentation for one osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
Balloon Kyphoplasty
VCF treatment system Vertebral fracture surgery
Balloon Kyphoplasty
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vertebral fracture surgery SpineJack®
Vertebral augmentation for one osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
Balloon Kyphoplasty
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. 1 painful VCF which at least meet all following criteria:
* Fracture due to diagnosed or presumed underlying osteoporosis
* VCF between T7 and L3
* Fracture age \<3 months
* VCF shows loss of height in the anterior, mid or posterior third of the VB from estimated pre-fracture configuration of at least 15% but not more than 40% based on X-Ray at baseline
* The Index fracture is acute or persistent (not healed), as demonstrated by T2 weighted STIR MRI (or bone scan if patient is contraindicated for MRI)
3. Patient has failed conservative medical therapy, defined as either having a VAS back pain score of ≥50 mm at 6 weeks after initiation of fracture care or a VAS back pain score of ≥70mm at 2 weeks after initiation of fracture care
4. Investigator believes target VB is suitable for SpineJack procedure and Balloon kyphoplasty (e.g., appropriate pedicle diameter) assessed on CT scan pre op
5. Patient has an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of ≥ 30/100
6. Patient is mentally capable and willing to sign a study specific informed consent as documentation of the informed consent process prior to any study procedures
7. The patient is willing and able to comply with all study requirements including follow-up visits and radiographic assessments.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Target VCF due to high-energy trauma
3. Target VCF is diagnosed as an osteonecrotic fracture
4. Segmental kyphosis of target VB of \>30°
5. Any prior surgical treatment for a vertebral body compression fracture or other surgical procedure on target VB or adjacent level
6. The patient has uncontrolled diabetes
7. Pre-existing or clinically unstable neurologic deficit
8. The patient has spinal canal compromise causing clinical manifestations of cord, neural foramen, or nerve root compression at the level to be treated
9. Any physical exam evidence of myelopathy or radiculopathy
10. The patient has pain based on clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus or severe spinal stenosis (progressive weakness or paralysis)
11. Patient not able to walk without assistance prior to fracture
12. Any radiographic evidence of pedicle fracture visible on CT scan pre op
13. Spondylolisthesis \>Grade 1 at target VB
14. Any underlying systemic bone disease other than osteoporosis (e.g., osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfect, Paget's disease, etc.)
15. A medical contraindication to spinal surgery and/or general anesthesia, such as coagulopathy and/or taking warfarin (Coumadin) or other anticoagulant on regular basis for coagulopathy (with a threshold for normal being INR≤1.5, PTT within lab normal range, and platelet count \> 100,000)
16. Pain due to any other condition that requires daily narcotic medication
17. Disabling back pain due to causes other than acute fracture
18. History of intolerance or allergic reaction to titanium or acrylic compounds
19. Active systemic or local infection at baseline
20. Body mass index \>40
21. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
22. Any other medical illness or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, is likely to impair long-term follow-up (e.g., cancer) or greatly increase the risk of surgery including but not limited to patients with contraindications for general anesthesia (surgeon expertise)
23. Any evidence of alcohol or drug abuse
24. The patient has uncontrolled psychiatric illness or severe dementia
25. The patient is currently on anti-cancer therapy or anti-HIV therapy
26. Patient's life expectancy is less than the study duration or undergoing palliative care
27. Participating in any other investigational study
28. The patient is on long-term steroid therapy (steroid dose ≥ 30 mg /day for \> 3 months)
29. The patient is known to be involved in medical litigation including Workmen's Compensation
30. Patient with contraindication for MRI
31. The patient is pregnant or considering getting pregnant during study participation.
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ACES Ing.-GmbH
OTHER
Vexim SA
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marie-Pierre HONTAS, Director Clinical Affairs
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Vexim SA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Jean Minjoz Service Neurochirurgie
Besançon, , France
Centre Hospitalier La Cavale Blanche
Brest, , France
CHU La Timone
Marseille, , France
Hôpital Nord
Marseille, , France
CHU Hôtel Dieu Service Neuro traumatologie
Nantes, , France
Klinik und Poliklinik fur Orthopädie Universitatsklinikum
Bonn, , Germany
Loretto-Krankenhaus Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Krankenhaus NEUWERK Sankt Augustinus kliniken
Mönchengladbach, , Germany
Ospedale SS Trinita ASL8
Cagliari, , Italy
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
Santander, , Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid,
Valladolid, , Spain
HFR Fribourg - Hôpital cantonal
Fribourg, , Switzerland
Clinique Bois-Cerf
Lausanne, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SAKOS - EU2014-05
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.