ENCOURAGE: Evaluating Community Peer Advisors and Diabetes Outcomes in Rural Alabama
NCT ID: NCT02460718
Last Updated: 2016-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
424 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-02-28
2012-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Diabetes Control Through Peer Counseling and Incentives
NCT01125956
Improving Diabetes Medication Adherence for African Americans in Madison and Milwaukee Through Peer Support
NCT04028076
A Trial of Incentives and Peer Mentors to Improve Diabetic Outcomes
NCT01125969
Peer Support and Remote Patient Monitoring for Black Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT07181304
Effect of Peer Support Intervention on Medication Adherence, Self-care and Knowledge Among Patients With Diabetes
NCT07145983
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study had three specific aims:
Aim 1. In Phase I (months 0-8), to perform a qualitative needs assessment with peer advisors and health care providers to inform peer advisor roles and responsibilities (i.e., the intervention) and peer advisor recruitment strategies, curriculum and training; and patient recruitment plans.
Aim 2. Also in Phase I, to pilot our collaboratively developed intervention and, based on pilot test results, to recruit and train peer advisors for the intervention, and begin patient recruitment.
Aim 3. In Phase II (months 9-32), conduct the group randomized implementation trial and evaluate it using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control group
Participants received 1-hour group diabetes education class covering diabetes basics, healthy eating, stress reduction, physical activity, social support, and how to get the most out of their doctors visit. Participants also received a diabetes report card showing their Hba1c, blood pressure, ldl cholesterol, and body weight.
No interventions assigned to this group
Encourage study
Participants in the intervention arm were paired with a peer coach, interacting by telephone weekly for the first 8 weeks and then monthly for a total of 10 months.
Participants also received 1-hour group diabetes education class covering diabetes basics, healthy eating, stress reduction, physical activity, social support, and how to get the most out of their doctors visit. Participants also received a diabetes report card showing their Hba1c, blood pressure, ldl cholesterol, and body weight.
ENCOURAGE Study
This intervention tested the effects of a peer coaching program plus brief diabetes education versus brief diabetes education alone on diabetes outcomes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ENCOURAGE Study
This intervention tested the effects of a peer coaching program plus brief diabetes education versus brief diabetes education alone on diabetes outcomes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Monika M. Safford
Professor
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cherrington AL, Khodneva Y, Richman JS, Andreae SJ, Gamboa C, Safford MM. Impact of Peer Support on Acute Care Visits and Hospitalizations for Individuals With Diabetes and Depressive Symptoms: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2463-2470. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0550. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
T0808270039
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.