POEM Anterior Versus Posterior Approach

NCT ID: NCT02454335

Last Updated: 2018-01-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2017-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an incisionless procedure used to treat esophageal achalasia, performed by GI endoscopist without cutting any surface of the human body. The main constituent of the procedure is the myotomy part, through which the endoscopist cuts the muscle fibers in the submucosa. Since this procedure is completely new to the area of treatment of achalasia, it is unknown whether a posterior or an anterior myotomy is better in relieving the symptoms. Thenceforth, this study aims at randomizing patients with achalasia presenting for POEM to getting either the posterior or the anterior myotomy. Patients will be followed up for symptoms and complications; data will be extracted and the appropriate analysis will be employed to determine if there is any difference of outcome between the two techniques of myotomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is an effective, minimally-invasive treatment for achalasia that has been adopted over the past few years. As more programs attempt to adopt the novel technique, there is an increased need for trials to help guide the growth of the procedure. Review of the current literature reveals that most endoscopists prefer an anterior approach, with an incision in the anterior/ anterolateral wall of the esophagus. This approach has been used with tremendous success in decreasing the symptoms of dysphagia and lowering esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure since the first description of the procedure in humans in 2010. However, it can be technically challenging in patients with anterior scarring from prior surgery or radiation, in whom a posterior approach has typically been used. Alternatively, the posterior approach, with incision in the posterolateral wall of the esophagus, has been adopted with great success by several endoscopists as the primary approach to myotomy. Reports involving the posterior approach have also shown significant symptom relief as defined by symptoms score (Eckardt score) \< 3, decreased LES pressure, and low complication rates.

However, despite high rates of technical and clinical success, the posterior approach has not been as widely adopted as the anterior approach. Without comparison of the two approaches in terms of efficacy and safety, the optimal technique to myotomy for POEM is yet to be defined. The investigators main hypothesis is that the posterior myotomy is as efficacious as the anterior myotomy in terms of improvement of achalasia symptoms as indicated by reduction in the Eckardt score and LES pressure. Adaptation of both techniques may increase options in approach for routine POEM and increase the number of patients that are able to undergo the procedure, thereby promoting its applicability.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Achalasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Anterior Approach

For the anterior approach, an incision will be made in the 1 to 2 o'clock position of the esophageal wall.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The intervention is the POEM procedure performed by either anterior approach or posterior approach orientation of the incision for mucosal entry.

Posterior Approach

For the posterior approach, a mucosal incision will be made at the 5 to 6 o'clock position

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The intervention is the POEM procedure performed by either anterior approach or posterior approach orientation of the incision for mucosal entry.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy

The intervention is the POEM procedure performed by either anterior approach or posterior approach orientation of the incision for mucosal entry.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

POEM

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patient age greater than 18 years old
* Confirmed diagnosis of achalasia via high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM)

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous surgery of the esophagus or stomach
* Active severe esophagitis
* Large lower esophageal diverticula
* Large \> 3cm hiatal hernia
* Sigmoid esophagus
* Known gastroesophageal malignancy
* Inability to tolerate sedated upper endoscopy due to cardiopulmonary instability, severe pulmonary disease or other contraindication to endoscopy
* Cirrhosis with portal hypertension, varices, and/or ascites
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women (all women of child-bearing age will undergo urine pregnancy testing)
* Acute gastrointestinal bleeding
* Uncorrectable coagulopathy defined by INR \> 1.5 or platelet \< 50
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Rivory J, Eleftheriadis N, Chiu PWY, Shiwaku H, Ogihara K, Ismail A, Abusamaan MS, El Zein MH, Wong VW, Billioux VG, Kumbhari V, Kalloo AN, Ponchon T, Pioche M. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: anterior versus posterior approach: a randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Feb;91(2):288-297.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.034. Epub 2019 Aug 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31408652 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NA_00093759

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy
NCT01402518 COMPLETED