Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2017-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Investigation of TAS-119 Monotherapy
NCT02448589
A Study of TAS-116 in Patients With Solid Tumors
NCT02965885
A Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Study of TAS-114 in Combination With Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
NCT02025803
SMP-3124LP in Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors
NCT06526819
A Phase I Study of TAS-102 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With Hepatic Impairment
NCT02301104
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study will be conducted in two parts: a Dose-Escalation Phase (Part 1) to determine the MTD; and an Expansion Phase (Part 2) to further evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy with the MTD. Patients will receive the study medication according to the proposed treatment schedule until disease progression (PD), occurrence of intolerable side effects, removal by the Investigator or withdrawal of consent. A patient is considered discontinued from study treatment when TAS-114 is discontinued.
Male or female patients age 18 years or older with confirmed advanced solid tumor(s) for which no standard therapy exists.
TAS-114/S-1 will be administered BID for 14 days followed by a 7-day recovery period, every 21 days (1 cycle) in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dose Escalation TAS-114 (PART 1)
Each cycle will be 21 days: 14 days of treatment and 7 days recovery. TAS-114 and S-1 will be escalated according to a defined dosing table and specific DLT criteria.
TAS-114
TAS-114 is an inhibitor of dUTPase, a gatekeeper protein in pyrimidine-metabolism.
S-1
S-1 is an oral antimetabolite; a combination of three pharmacological compounds: tegafur (FT), gimeracil (CDHP), and oteracil (Oxo)
Expansion phase TAS-114 (PART 2)
The TAS-114 and S-1 MTD established in the Dose Escalation Phase will be administered BID for 14 days followed by a 7 day recovery period.
This regimen is repeated every 21 days thereafter. Approximately 40 to 60 evaluable patients will be enrolled in the Expansion Phase. PGx, PD and PK analysis will be performed based on specific criteria.
TAS-114
TAS-114 is an inhibitor of dUTPase, a gatekeeper protein in pyrimidine-metabolism.
S-1
S-1 is an oral antimetabolite; a combination of three pharmacological compounds: tegafur (FT), gimeracil (CDHP), and oteracil (Oxo)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TAS-114
TAS-114 is an inhibitor of dUTPase, a gatekeeper protein in pyrimidine-metabolism.
S-1
S-1 is an oral antimetabolite; a combination of three pharmacological compounds: tegafur (FT), gimeracil (CDHP), and oteracil (Oxo)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Is ≥18 years of age
3. Has histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumor(s) for which no standard therapy exists.
4. Expansion Phase only: Has at least one measurable lesion
5. Is able to take medications orally (e.g., no feeding tube).
6. Has adequate organ function
7. Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) within 7 days prior to starting the study drug.
8. Is willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Has a serious illness or medical condition(s)
3. Is receiving concomitant treatment with drugs that may interact with S-1
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Taiho Oncology, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasme University Hospital-ULB
Brussels, , Belgium
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, , France
IRCCS San Marino IST
Genoa, , Italy
Universita Vita-Salute San Raffaele
Milan, , Italy
IOSI Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana
Bellinzona, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
HEIDELBERGER C, CHAUDHURI NK, DANNEBERG P, MOOREN D, GRIESBACH L, DUSCHINSKY R, SCHNITZER RJ, PLEVEN E, SCHEINER J. Fluorinated pyrimidines, a new class of tumour-inhibitory compounds. Nature. 1957 Mar 30;179(4561):663-6. doi: 10.1038/179663a0. No abstract available.
Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG. 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 May;3(5):330-8. doi: 10.1038/nrc1074.
Shirasaka T. Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1): its clinical usefulness and future vistas. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan;39(1):2-15. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn127. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
Peters GJ, Backus HH, Freemantle S, van Triest B, Codacci-Pisanelli G, van der Wilt CL, Smid K, Lunec J, Calvert AH, Marsh S, McLeod HL, Bloemena E, Meijer S, Jansen G, van Groeningen CJ, Pinedo HM. Induction of thymidylate synthase as a 5-fluorouracil resistance mechanism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002 Jul 18;1587(2-3):194-205. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(02)00082-0.
Fukushima M, Satake H, Uchida J, Shimamoto Y, Kato T, Takechi T, Okabe H, Fujioka A, Nakano K, Ohshimo H, Takeda S, Shirasaka T. Preclinical antitumor efficacy of S-1: a new oral formulation of 5-fluorouracil on human tumor xenografts. Int J Oncol. 1998 Oct;13(4):693-8. doi: 10.3892/ijo.13.4.693.
Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Fukushima M. Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats. Cancer Res. 1993 Sep 1;53(17):4004-9.
Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C, Rodrigues A, Fodor M, Chao Y, Voznyi E, Risse ML, Ajani JA; V325 Study Group. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 1;24(31):4991-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8429.
Johnston PG, Fisher ER, Rockette HE, Fisher B, Wolmark N, Drake JC, Chabner BA, Allegra CJ. The role of thymidylate synthase expression in prognosis and outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Dec;12(12):2640-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.12.2640.
Johnston PG, Lenz HJ, Leichman CG, Danenberg KD, Allegra CJ, Danenberg PV, Leichman L. Thymidylate synthase gene and protein expression correlate and are associated with response to 5-fluorouracil in human colorectal and gastric tumors. Cancer Res. 1995 Apr 1;55(7):1407-12.
Lenz HJ, Leichman CG, Danenberg KD, Danenberg PV, Groshen S, Cohen H, Laine L, Crookes P, Silberman H, Baranda J, Garcia Y, Li J, Leichman L. Thymidylate synthase mRNA level in adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a predictor for primary tumor response and overall survival. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jan;14(1):176-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.176.
Peters GJ, van der Wilt CL, van Groeningen CJ, Smid K, Meijer S, Pinedo HM. Thymidylate synthase inhibition after administration of fluorouracil with or without leucovorin in colon cancer patients: implications for treatment with fluorouracil. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Oct;12(10):2035-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2035.
Aschele C, Debernardis D, Casazza S, Antonelli G, Tunesi G, Baldo C, Lionetto R, Maley F, Sobrero A. Immunohistochemical quantitation of thymidylate synthase expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1760-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1760.
Ichikawa W, Takahashi T, Suto K, Yamashita T, Nihei Z, Shirota Y, Shimizu M, Sasaki Y, Hirayama R. Thymidylate synthase predictive power is overcome by irinotecan combination therapy with S-1 for gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004 Oct 4;91(7):1245-50. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602139.
Ladner RD. The role of dUTPase and uracil-DNA repair in cancer chemotherapy. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2001 Dec;2(4):361-70. doi: 10.2174/1389203013380991.
Quesada-Soriano I, Casas-Solvas JM, Recio E, Ruiz-Perez LM, Vargas-Berenguel A, Gonzalez-Pacanowska D, Garcia-Fuentes L. Kinetic properties and specificity of trimeric Plasmodium falciparum and human dUTPases. Biochimie. 2010 Feb;92(2):178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2009.10.008. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
Canman CE, Radany EH, Parsels LA, Davis MA, Lawrence TS, Maybaum J. Induction of resistance to fluorodeoxyuridine cytotoxicity and DNA damage in human tumor cells by expression of Escherichia coli deoxyuridinetriphosphatase. Cancer Res. 1994 May 1;54(9):2296-8.
Koehler SE, Ladner RD. Small interfering RNA-mediated suppression of dUTPase sensitizes cancer cell lines to thymidylate synthase inhibition. Mol Pharmacol. 2004 Sep;66(3):620-6. doi: 10.1124/mol.66.3..
Ladner RD, Lynch FJ, Groshen S, Xiong YP, Sherrod A, Caradonna SJ, Stoehlmacher J, Lenz HJ. dUTP nucleotidohydrolase isoform expression in normal and neoplastic tissues: association with survival and response to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2000 Jul 1;60(13):3493-503.
Nobili S, Napoli C, Landini I, Morganti M, Cianchi F, Valanzano R, Tonelli F, Cortesini C, Mazzei T, Mini E. Identification of potential pharmacogenomic markers of clinical efficacy of 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2011 Apr 15;128(8):1935-45. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25514.
Takatori H, Yamashita T, Honda M, Nishino R, Arai K, Yamashita T, Takamura H, Ohta T, Zen Y, Kaneko S. dUTP pyrophosphatase expression correlates with a poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2010 Mar;30(3):438-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02177.x. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
McIntosh EM, Haynes RH. dUTP pyrophosphatase as a potential target for chemotherapeutic drug development. Acta Biochim Pol. 1997;44(2):159-71.
Wilson PM, Fazzone W, LaBonte MJ, Deng J, Neamati N, Ladner RD. Novel opportunities for thymidylate metabolism as a therapeutic target. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Sep;7(9):3029-37. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0280.
Hayashi T, Yamaguchi S, Kito S, Tanaka G, Kurokawa K, Hirota T. [An oral repeated dose toxicity study of a new antineoplastic agent S-1 in dogs. I. A 13-week repeated dose toxicity study. II. An ophthalmologic toxicity recovery study]. J Toxicol Sci. 1996 Nov;21 Suppl 3:527-44. doi: 10.2131/jts.21.supplementiii_527. Japanese.
Zhu AX, Clark JW, Ryan DP, Meyerhardt JA, Enzinger PC, Earle CC, Fuchs CS, Regan E, Anbe H, Houghton M, Zhang J, Urrea P, Kulke MH. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 administered for 14 days in a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;59(3):285-93. doi: 10.1007/s00280-006-0265-y. Epub 2006 Jun 20.
Benson AB 3rd, Ajani JA, Catalano RB, Engelking C, Kornblau SM, Martenson JA Jr, McCallum R, Mitchell EP, O'Dorisio TM, Vokes EE, Wadler S. Recommended guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2918-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.132.
American Society of Clinical Oncology; Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR, Feyer P, Clark-Snow R, Koeller JM, Morrow GR, Chinnery LW, Chesney MJ, Gralla RJ, Grunberg SM. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 20;24(18):2932-47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.9591. Epub 2006 May 22.
Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition. 1989 Sep-Oct;5(5):303-11; discussion 312-3. No abstract available.
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
Saito K, Nagashima H, Noguchi K, Yoshisue K, Yokogawa T, Matsushima E, Tahara T, Takagi S. First-in-human, phase I dose-escalation study of single and multiple doses of a first-in-class enhancer of fluoropyrimidines, a dUTPase inhibitor (TAS-114) in healthy male volunteers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Mar;73(3):577-83. doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2383-2. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
Ajani JA, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G, Moiseyenko V, Lichinitser M, Gorbunova V, Vynnychenko I, Garin A, Lang I, Falcon S. Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1547-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4706. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012-002674-31
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
TAS-114-102
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.