Adjuvant FEC Versus EP in Breast Cancer (MIG5)

NCT ID: NCT02450058

Last Updated: 2015-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1055 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1996-11-30

Study Completion Date

2012-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this multicenter, randomized phase III trial, node positive early breast cancer patients are randomly assigned to receive either 6 cycles of FEC (5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, on day 1, every three weeks) or 4 cycles of EP (epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, on day 1, every three weeks). The primary study endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include toxicity and event free survival (EFS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

At the time the Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest- Mammella Intergruppo trial 5 (GONO-MIG5) was designed in 1996, paclitaxel was known to have efficacy in patients with advanced breast cancer, but its role was still to be established in the adjuvant setting. Therefore the GONO-MIG5 trial was designed to compare a standard anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen, i.e. 5fluorouracil, epirubicin, ciclophosphamide (FEC), given for 6 cycles to a new regimen containing both epirubicin and paclitaxel (EP), given concurrently, for 4 cycles. This latter regimen was chosen on the basis of the results obtained in metastatic breast cancer patients, where the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel was associated with more than 90% of objective response . Only four cycles of the new regimen were planned since the expected toxicity, particularly the cardiotoxicity, was high, and a short treatment duration was hoped to be the best strategy to obtain a favourable balance between the toxicity and the expected high efficacy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Chemotherapy, Adjuvant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FEC

5-Fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, intravenously on day 1, every 21 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

5-fluorouracil

Intervention Type DRUG

600 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles

epirubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, every 21 days for six cyles

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

600 mg/m2, intravenously on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles

EP

Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, 3-hour infusion on day 1, every 21 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

epirubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

90 mg/m2 on day 1, every 21 days for four cycles

paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

175 mg/m2, 3-hour infusion on day 1, every 21 days for four cycles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

5-fluorouracil

600 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

epirubicin

60 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, every 21 days for six cyles

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

600 mg/m2, intravenously on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

epirubicin

90 mg/m2 on day 1, every 21 days for four cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

paclitaxel

175 mg/m2, 3-hour infusion on day 1, every 21 days for four cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women with histologically confirmed breast cancer who had undergone radical mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery in addition to full ipsilateral axillary lymph node dissection
* Lymph node-positive disease with less than 10 involved axillary lymph nodes
* Surgery performed not more than 5 weeks before randomization
* ECOG performance status 0
* Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 2,000/mm³
* WBC ≥ 3,000/mm³
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
* Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* AST and ALT ≤ 1.5 times ULN
* Postoperative regional radiotherapy limited to the remaining breast admitted for patients who received breast-conserving surgery
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior or concurrent ipsilateral or contralateral invasive breast carcinoma within the last 10 years
* Metastatic disease, including metastasis in the ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes
* Prior chemotherapy or prior cytotoxic regimens or prior hormonal therapy
* Pregnant or nursing
* Other serious medical illness requiring medication, uncontrolled infections
* Other malignancy except adequately treated, cone-biopsied in situ carcinoma of the cervix or basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
* Recent myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or serious arrhythmia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lucia Del Mastro,MD

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lucia Del Mastro, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IRCCS San Martino - IST, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Federico Castiglione

Alba, , Italy

Site Status

Ornella Garrone

Cuneo, , Italy

Site Status

Lucia Del Mastro

Genoa, , Italy

Site Status

Giovanna Cavazzini

Mantova, , Italy

Site Status

Andrea Michelotti

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Tiziana Scotto

Sassari, , Italy

Site Status

Antonio Durando

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Saverio Danese

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OMI96.018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.