Study of REGN475 in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip

NCT ID: NCT02447276

Last Updated: 2017-03-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

421 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of REGN475 compared to placebo in participants with pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip and a history of inadequate joint pain relief or intolerance to current analgesic therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis, Hip

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Group A will receive REGN475 dosing regimen 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REGN475

Intervention Type DRUG

Group B

Group B will receive REGN475 dosing regimen 2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REGN475

Intervention Type DRUG

Group C

Group C will receive REGN475 dosing regimen 3

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REGN475

Intervention Type DRUG

Group D

Group D will receive REGN475 dosing regimen 4

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REGN475

Intervention Type DRUG

Group E

Group E will receive matching placebo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

REGN475

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Body mass index ≤39
2. Clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee or hip
3. History of inadequate pain relief or intolerance to analgesics used for OA
4. Moderate to severe pain in the index joint
5. History of regular use of analgesic medications for OA pain
6. Willing to discontinue current non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and opioid pain medications

Exclusion Criteria

1. Other diseases that may involve index knee or hip, including inflammatory joint diseases, crystalline disease (gout or pseudogout), endocrinopathies, metabolic joint disease, lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, joint infections, neuropathic disorders, avascular necrosis, Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy or tumors
2. History of osteonecrosis, destructive arthropathy (RPOA), hip dislocation, pathologic fractures, neuropathic joint arthropathy, knee dislocation or hip dislocation
3. Trauma to the index joint in the 30 days before screening
4. Active fibromyalgia, regional pain caused by lumbar or cervical compression with radiculopathy or other moderate to severe pain that may confound assessments or self-evaluation of the pain associated with OA
5. Prior to the start of the study has received a recommendation for, or is scheduled for joint replacement surgery to be performed during the study period
6. Presence of subchondral insufficiency fracture on screening films or MRI
7. Received an intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid in the affected index joint within 90 days prior to the screening visit
8. Systemic (ie, oral or intramuscular) corticosteroids within 30 days prior to the screening visit. Intra-articular corticosteroids in the index joint within 12 weeks of the screening visit, or to any other joint within 30 days prior to the screening visit.
9. History of autonomic neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, or presence of clinically relevant peripheral neuropathy at the time of screening
10. Women of childbearing potential who have a positive pregnancy test result, or who do not have their pregnancy test results at baseline
11. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trial Management

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tuscon, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Hot Spring, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

El Cajon, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Thousand Oaks, California, United States

Site Status

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fleming Island, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Weston, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Elkridge, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Hartsdale, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Plainview, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Cypress, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Mesquite, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Sandy City, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dakin P, DiMartino SJ, Gao H, Maloney J, Kivitz AJ, Schnitzer TJ, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Geba GP. The Efficacy, Tolerability, and Joint Safety of Fasinumab in Osteoarthritis Pain: A Phase IIb/III Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;71(11):1824-1834. doi: 10.1002/art.41012. Epub 2019 Sep 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31207169 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R475-PN-1227

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.