Probing the Dry Weight (DW) by Bioimpedance (BIA): Which is the Gold Standard Between Clinical DW and BIA DW?

NCT ID: NCT02446535

Last Updated: 2015-05-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-28

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background Very recently, a test aimed at assessing dry weight (DW) in hemodialysis (HD) patients has been developed, the "resistance stabilization test" (REST)

Aim of the study To verify if BIA-based DW (BIA DW) control is truly superior to current volume management in HD patients.

Protocol of the study DW determined with clinical methods (Clinical DW) is the gold standard by definition: Clinical DW is determined under strict clinical surveillance by the same attending physician. He will be helped by a clinical score of volume state about symptoms and signs of hypo- or hypervolemia. The physician is asked to adjust the DW of the candidates until their clinical score reaches zero before the BIA measurement. This Clinical DW will be compared with BIA DW, as obtained after performing REST

Phases of the study

The protocol study includes three sequential phases:

1. the Clinical DW is the gold standard by definition. Items of form B must be strictly applied until score = 0 is achieved;
2. The Clinical DW as indicated by the score = 0 becomes the target DW of the next standard HD session, in which BIA measurements are performed: R values are recorded continuously during the session.
3. REST is performed the following dialysis session. As per protocol, these dialysis sessions may be one or more than one, until flattening of the curve of the ratio R0/Rt (R0 is R at time 0 and Rt is R at a given time t during the HD session) of less than + 1% over 20 minutes in the presence of ongoing UF, is obtained.

Primary outcome

The primary outcome is the definition for each patient of the gold standard DW when comparing the Clinical and the BIA DW. Two are the possible scenarios:

1. the Clinical and the BIA DW will be very similar ( \< + 0.5 kg). Therefore, a reciprocal validation of the two methods for that specific patient has been obtained;
2. the Clinical and the BIA DW are different ( \> + 0.5 kg). If the BIA DW will be confirmed in the following six dialysis sessions, it means that the gold standard DW for that patient is the BIA DW.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Probing the dry weight (DW) was largely dependent on clinical subjective estimates until recently. New bedside non-invasive tools have been developed with the aim of providing more objective information on volume status and guiding physicians in the quest for DW. Among them, bioimpedance (BIA) appears to be very promising in the achievement of this goal. Resistance (R) and capacitance of tissues are the two basic properties in BIA. However, although impedance is an electrical property of tissues that can be directly used in body composition analysis, it is commonly embedded in predictive equations that are derived by correlation with criterion measures of body compartments.

Very recently, a test aimed at assessing DW in hemodialysis (HD) patients has been developed, the "resistance stabilization test" (REST). It is based on the following four items:

1. one or more daily and/or alternate day HD sessions lasting 6 hours with ultrafiltration (UF) rate ≤ 0.5 kg/hour are planned;
2. BIA measurements are determined injecting 800 microAmpere at 50 kilohertz alternating sinusoidal current with a standard tetrapolar technique (BIA 101 Impedance Analyzer). Resistance (R) is recorded starting at the beginning of the HD session (R0) and then, continuously, until the end of the 6-hour session;
3. DW is defined as the weight achieved after flattening of the curve of the ratio R0/Rt (R0 is R at time 0 and Rt is R at a given time t during the HD session) of less than + 1% over 20 minutes in the presence of ongoing UF, indicating no further decline in extracellular volume;
4. if at the end of the 6-hour HD session R stabilization is not attained, a new 6-hour HD treatment with UF rate ≤ 0.5 kg/h is planned until a BIA DW (according to the item 3) is obtained.

Aim of the study A study group is being created (REST/Collaborative Study Initiative) with the aim of verifying if BIA-based DW (BIA DW) control is truly superior to current volume management in HD patients.

Protocol of the study DW determined with clinical methods (Clinical DW) is the gold standard by definition: Clinical DW is determined under strict clinical surveillance by the same attending physician. He will be helped by a clinical score of volume state about symptoms and signs of hypo- or hypervolemia. The physician is asked to adjust the DW of the candidates until their clinical score reaches zero after a given number of HD sessions before the BIA measurement. This Clinical DW will be compared with BIA DW, as obtained after performing REST;

Phases of the study

The protocol study includes three sequential phases:

1. as already mentioned, the Clinical DW is the gold standard by definition. Items of form B must be strictly applied. Form B must be filled in session after session, until score = 0, index of euvolemia, is achieved;
2. The Clinical DW as indicated by the score = 0 becomes the target DW of the next standard HD session, in which BIA measurements are performed: R values are recorded continuously during the session (Form C must be filled in).
3. REST is performed the following dialysis session (all the details have been given in the background section). As per protocol, these dialysis sessions may be one or more than one, until flattening of the curve of the ratio R0/Rt (R0 is R at time 0 and Rt is R at a given time t during the HD session) of less than + 1% over 20 minutes in the presence of ongoing UF, is obtained.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Uremia Complication of Hemodialysis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BIA DW assessment

All patients have undergone a Clinical DW assessment. Then, they undergo HD sessions in which BIA DW is determined reducing body weight (kg): when flattening of the BIA resistance occurs, the BIA DW is achieved and compared with the Clinical DW

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

achievement of the DW by means of the BIA DW (RE.S.T.)

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

achievement of the DW by means of the BIA DW (RE.S.T.)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. patients older than 18 years
2. maintenance HD three times weekly.

Exclusion Criteria

1. dialysis vintage \< 3 months
2. overt edema
3. liver cirrhosis
4. cardiac failure
5. serum albumin \< 3 g/dl
6. pregnancy
7. metallic implants or a pacemaker
8. limb amputation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Miulli General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carlo Basile, M.D.

Scientific Director of the Division of Nephrology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nephrology and dialysis unit Miulli General Hospital

Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Carlo Basile, MD

Role: CONTACT

080 3054964

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Carlo Basile, Md

Role: primary

00390803054250

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MiulliGH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Weight Management of Dialysis Patients
NCT06333574 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA