Topical Nepafenac as Supplement for Diabetic Macular Edema

NCT ID: NCT02443012

Last Updated: 2015-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

47 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of visual loss in patients with diabetes mellitus. The standard treatment is with focal/grid laser therapy. Topical nepafenac was used as an adjunct therapy for treatment of DME.

The aim of this study is to compare the difference of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at 3 months post treatment between combination therapy of laser and topical nepafenac and laser monotherapy in patients with DME.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetes mellitus with its systemic complications has been an enormous health treat to the world population today. In the US, the ophthalmic related complications has been estimated to cause up to 4.2 million (28.5%) people in 2005 till 2008 to suffer from blindness. One of the most common causes of visual acuity loss in patients with diabetes mellitus is diabetic macular edema (DME).

The gold standard of treatment for clinically significant macular edema (CSME), a form of DME, is through focal and grid laser as shown by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. The development of newer drugs such as anti vascular endothelial growth factors anti (VEGFs), an alternative to laser treatment, has become a topic of interest in the recent years. Other alternative to treatment of DME is steroid such as triamcinolone injection and dexamethasone injections. However, both anti VEGFs and steroids are expensive and not readily available in all centres. Both types of medications require repeated treatment and the route of administration through intravitreal also poses risk of endophthalmitis, lens injury, retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, increase in intraocular pressure and cataract.

The pathophysiology of DME is not fully understood yet. It was suggested that it is likely to be a chronic low-grade inflammation. Through this theory, topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used to treat DME. The investigators postulate that the addition of topical NSAIDs in patients receiving standard treatment of laser therapy may help to improve the outcome of patients with DME. It has the advantage of no needles involved, convenient, easy to use and minimal side effects. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of visual acuity and macular thickness at 3 months post treatment between laser monotherapy and combination of laser and topical nepafenac in DME.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nevanac

Patients with CSME treated with argon laser photocoagulation (focal/grid laser) and Topical Gutt Nepafenac 0.1% given 8 hourly interval for 3 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Topical Gutt Nepafenac 0.1%

Intervention Type DRUG

Topical Nepafenac as an adjunct to focal/grid laser

Laser

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Grid/Focal Laser Photocoagulation

Laser

Patients with CSME treated with argon laser photocoagulation (focal/grid laser)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Laser

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Grid/Focal Laser Photocoagulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Topical Gutt Nepafenac 0.1%

Topical Nepafenac as an adjunct to focal/grid laser

Intervention Type DRUG

Laser

Grid/Focal Laser Photocoagulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Nevanac

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with CSME
* Aged 18 to 70 years old
* Clear media (Able to perform OCT)
* HbA1c less than 12% at 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

* CSME with severe Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) or Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy(PDR)
* Previous laser treatment
* Previous ocular injury or surgery
* History of taking topical or systemic anti inflammatory agents
* Allergic to NSAIDs
* Other ocular pathology (ARMD, Glaucoma, IPCV)
* High myope
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universiti Sains Malaysia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jan Bond Chan

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zunaina Embong, MS Ophthal

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Universiti Sains Malaysia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia

Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia

Site Status

Hospital Selayang

Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Malaysia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Callanan D, Williams P. Topical nepafenac in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;2(4):689-92. doi: 10.2147/opth.s3965.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19668417 (View on PubMed)

Hariprasad SM, Callanan D, Gainey S, He YG, Warren K. Cystoid and diabetic macular edema treated with nepafenac 0.1%. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Dec;23(6):585-90. doi: 10.1089/jop.2007.0062.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18001248 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1001/PPSP/812064

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NMRR-13-1296-13714

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.