A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Anti-TNF(Alpha) Refractory Participants With Active Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

NCT ID: NCT02438787

Last Updated: 2025-04-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

315 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2017-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ustekinumab, in adult anti-TNF(alpha) refractory participants with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), as measured by the reduction in signs and symptoms of radiographic AxSpA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase 3, multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), double-blind (neither the researchers nor the participants know what treatment the participant is receiving), placebo-controlled (an inactive substance; a pretend treatment \[with no drug in it\] that is compared in a clinical trial with a drug to test if the drug has a real effect) study. The study consists of 3 phases; Screening (up to 8 weeks), Treatment phase: placebo-controlled (Week 0 to 24) and active treatment (Week 24 to Week 52), and Safety Follow-up (up to 12 weeks). Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: placebo, ustekinumab 45 mg and ustekinumab 90 mg. The total duration of study will be up to 64 weeks. Participants will be primarily assessed for Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 response at Week 24. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Axial Spondyloarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 (placebo)

Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16. At Week 24 all participants (with the exception of participants who qualified for early escape \[EE\]) will be re-randomized to receive either ustekinumab 45 or 90 milligram (mg) SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52. Participants who meet EE criteria (less than \[\<\] 10 percent \[%\] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16 in Group 1.

Ustekinumab 45 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 2.

Ustekinumab 90 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 3.

Golimumab 50 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants who meet EE criteria (less than \[\<\] 10 percent \[%\] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52 in Group 1, 2 and 3.

Group 2 (ustekinumab 45 mg)

Ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52. At Week 24, participants will receive placebo SC injection to maintain the blind. Participants who meet EE criteria (\<10% improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and q4w thereafter through Week 52.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ustekinumab 45 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 2.

Golimumab 50 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants who meet EE criteria (less than \[\<\] 10 percent \[%\] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52 in Group 1, 2 and 3.

Group 3 (ustekinumab 90 mg)

Ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52. At Week 24, participants will receive placebo SC injection to maintain the blind. Participants who meet EE criteria (\<10% improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and q4w thereafter through Week 52.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ustekinumab 90 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 3.

Golimumab 50 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants who meet EE criteria (less than \[\<\] 10 percent \[%\] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52 in Group 1, 2 and 3.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo

Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16 in Group 1.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ustekinumab 45 mg

Ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 2.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ustekinumab 90 mg

Ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 3.

Intervention Type DRUG

Golimumab 50 mg

Participants who meet EE criteria (less than \[\<\] 10 percent \[%\] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52 in Group 1, 2 and 3.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants must have a diagnosis of definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS), as defined by the modified 1984 New York criteria. The radiographic criterion must be confirmed by a central xray reader and at least 1 clinical criterion must be met
* Participants must have symptoms of active disease at screening and at baseline, as evidenced by both a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score of greater than or equal to (\>=4) and a visual analog scale (VAS) score for total back pain of \>=4, each on a scale of 0 to 10
* Participants with elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level of \>=0.300 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) at screening
* Refractory by either lack of benefit or documented intolerance to 1 and no more than 1 anti-TNF(alpha) agent
* Inadequate response to at least 2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) over a 4-week period in total with maximal doses of NSAID(s), or is unable to receive a full 4 weeks of maximal NSAID therapy because of intolerance, toxicity, or contraindications to NSAIDs.
* Participants with complete ankylosis of the spine are permitted to be included in the study, but will be limited to approximately 10 percent (%) of the study population

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants who have other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit from the ustekinumab therapy, including but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
* Participants who have received infliximab or infliximab biosimilar, within 12 weeks of the first study agent administration; have received adalimumab, adalimumab biosimilar, or certolizumab pegol within 6 weeks of the first study agent administration; have received etanercept or etanercept biosimilar within 6 weeks of the first study agent administration
* Participants who have ever received golimumab
* Participants who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy or fathering a child while enrolled in the study or within 5 months after receiving the last administration of study agent
* Participants who have received any systemic immunosuppressives or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) within 4 weeks prior to first administration of study agent. Medications in these categories include, but are not limited to leflunomide, chloroquine, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, gold, and penicillamine
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Fremont, California, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Monroe, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Eagan, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Orchard Park, New York, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Mesquite, Texas, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Ciudad de La Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

Ciudad de San Miguel de Tucuman, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Merksem (Antwerp), , Belgium

Site Status

Campinas, , Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

Goiânia, , Brazil

Site Status

Juiz de Fora, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

Santo André, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Burgas, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Bruntál, , Czechia

Site Status

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Uherské Hradiště, , Czechia

Site Status

Zlín, , Czechia

Site Status

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

Chambray-lès-Tours, , France

Site Status

Échirolles, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Bad Neuheim, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Gommern, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

Olsberg, , Germany

Site Status

Ratingen, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Eger, , Hungary

Site Status

Kistarcsa, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Culiacán, , Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Nadarzyn, , Poland

Site Status

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Almada, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Belgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Chita, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Khanty-Mansiysk, , Russia

Site Status

Kursk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Orenburg, , Russia

Site Status

Petrozavodsk, , Russia

Site Status

Pyatigorsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Zelenograd, , Russia

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Daejeon, , South Korea

Site Status

Gwangju, , South Korea

Site Status

Jeonju, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Suwon, , South Korea

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Bilbao, , Spain

Site Status

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Hualien City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Cherkasy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Poltava, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ternopil, , Ukraine

Site Status

Uzhhorod, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Bath, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leytonstone, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Peterborough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Stoke-on-Trent, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Upton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Czechia France Germany Hungary Mexico Poland Portugal Russia South Korea Spain Taiwan Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kavanaugh A, Baraliakos X, Gao S, Chen W, Sweet K, Chakravarty SD, Song Q, Shawi M, Rahman P. Genetic and Molecular Distinctions Between Axial Psoriatic Arthritis and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Post Hoc Analyses from Four Phase 3 Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2439-2456. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02475-4. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36995469 (View on PubMed)

Deodhar A, Gensler LS, Sieper J, Clark M, Calderon C, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Leu JH, Campbell K, Sweet K, Harrison DD, Hsia EC, van der Heijde D. Three Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;71(2):258-270. doi: 10.1002/art.40728. Epub 2018 Dec 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30225992 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CNTO1275AKS3002

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2015-000288-16

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR107099

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.