Timing of Direct Current Cardioversion (DCC) in Patients Undergoing Ablation of Persistent/Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT02429648

Last Updated: 2017-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare which strategy is superior in patients with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing ablation, direct current cardioversion (DCC) prior to empirical pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ; or pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)ablation in atrial fibrillation then Direct current cardioversion (DCC) if the patient remains in atrial fibrillation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ablation of persistent/permanent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) remains a challenge. There are several strategies to improve the outcomes of persistent/permanent AF ablation. At the Cleveland Clinic one of the commonly used strategies is Direct Current Cardioversion (DCC). Depending on physician preference, patients may be ablated in atrial fibrillation then Direct current cardioverted; or Direct current cardioverted and ablated in sinus rhythm. Neither approach has been shown to be superior. As both approaches are currently being performed based on physician preference, the investigators propose to study and compare both approaches in a randomized fashion for evidence based practice.

The purpose of this study is to compare which standard of care strategy is superior in patients with persistent/permanent Atrial Fibrillation undergoing ablation, direct current cardioversion prior to empirical pulmonary vein isolation; or ablation in atrial fibrillation then direct current cardioversion if the patient remains in atrial fibrillation

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PVI performed in Normal Sinus Rhythm

DCC first then PVI

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DCC first then PVI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

DCC performed prior to PVI

PVI performed in Atrial Fibrillation

PVI then DCC after if patient remains in Atrial Fibrillation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PVI then DCC after

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

DCC performed after PVI, if patient remains in Atrial Fibrillation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DCC first then PVI

DCC performed prior to PVI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PVI then DCC after

DCC performed after PVI, if patient remains in Atrial Fibrillation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Persistent or long standing persistent AF resistant to anti-arrhythmic medication. Must have been present for more than 2 months
* Therapeutic anticoagulation for at least three weeks prior to initiation of therapy, or TEE performed prior to the procedure
* Age \>= 18 years old. (Females must be either post-menopausal \>12 months, practicing a protocol-acceptable method of birth control
* Scheduled for Pulmonary Vein Isolation
* Amiodarone will be stopped at least 3 months prior to procedure

Exclusion Criteria

* Reversible causes of AF such as pericarditis, hyperthyroidism
* Presently with Valvular Heart disease requiring surgical intervention
* Presently with coronary artery disease requiring surgical intervention
* Early Post-operative AF (within three months of surgery)
* Previous MAZE or left atrial instrumentation
* Life expectancy \<= 2 years
* Social factors that would preclude follow up or make compliance difficult.
* Contraindication to the use of anti-arrhythmic medications and/or coumadin and heparin
* Enrollment in another investigational drug or device study
* Patients with severe pulmonary disease
* Documented intra-atrial thrombus, tumor, or another abnormality which precludes catheter introduction
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Walid Saliba

Walid Saliba, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Walid Saliba, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bassiouny M, Saliba W, Hussein A, Rickard J, Diab M, Aman W, Dresing T, Callahan T 4th, Bhargava M, Martin DO, Shao M, Baranowski B, Tarakji K, Tchou PJ, Hakim A, Kanj M, Lindsay B, Wazni O. Randomized Study of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Ablate in Sinus Rhythm Versus Ablate Complex-Fractionated Atrial Electrograms in Atrial Fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Feb;9(2):e003596. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003596.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26857909 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09-308

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.