Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-29
2017-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Corifollitropin Alfa Combined With Menotropin Versus Follitropin and Lutropin Alfa in Expected Suboptimal Responders
NCT03177538
Effect of Treatment With Corifollitropin Alpha in Vitro Fertilization in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response.
NCT02118051
Elonva in Combination With Hp-FSH Versus Elonva With Low Dose hCG
NCT03208972
A Post Marketing Observational Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Elonva (Corifollitropin Alfa) in General Practice (P08165)
NCT01408615
Corifollitropin Alfa and Embryo Morphokinetics
NCT04142190
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. A tendency for Elonva COH to result in a higher ovarian response with increased risk of Ovarian Hyper-Stimulation Syndrome (OHSS). While this risk of OHSS was not statistically significant in the pivotal Engage study, there was still a numerically greater chance of OHSS and a greater chance of the IVF cycle being cancelled due to OHSS risk in the Elonva arm compared to the traditional Puregon arm. Since women at high risk of OHSS were excluded from the Engage study, clinicians perceive that the risk of OHSS is likely to be significantly greater in the more heterogeneous general clinical population. Whether this is a correct assumption is still up for debate, but it is a perceived issue with the existing Elonva protocol that must be addressed if Elonva is to become used widely as a COH stimulant.
2. According to the Engage and Ensure studies, the majority (70%) of women using Elonva require "top up"short acting Puregon rFSH, with an average of 2 doses being required before the patients reach the criteria for triggering and oocyte retrieval. As a result clinics are required to teach two different injection protocols, increasing the time required to educate the patient and possibly increasing the risk of confusion. The ability to deliver a solitary COH stimulant without the need for any "top up" Puregon would be a major advantage.
Rationale We would like to propose that it may be possible to use a solitary dose of Elonva as the sole COS rFSH stimulant for the vast majority of women undergoing IVF, assuming that it is possible that "coasting" (withholding short acting rFSH) from day 8 of the stimulation until trigger/ oocyte retrieval will still result in a significant number of mature oocytes being produced.
In the setting of OHSS it is common practice to withhold any further rFSH stimulant towards the end of the COS process. It is generally accepted that medium size follicles of 14 mm or greater will continue to develop to maturity in the absence of rFSH stimulation, while smaller follicles will regress. This has the therapeutic advantage of reducing estradiol levels and OHSS risk in women at high risk of OHSS. With this coasting physiology in mind, we propose that provided a single injection of Elonva can result in a significant number of follicles being 14 mm or greater by day 8 of stimulation, further rFSH will not be required. Results from the Engage study (Doody et al 2011) reveal that by day 8 of stimulation on average there were 5.1 follicles of 15 mm or greater. Therefore even if no further "top up" rFSH was given from day 8, one could expect to get at least 5 mature oocytes from an oocyte retrieval triggered by hCG in the next 2 days. While 5 mature oocytes is significantly less than what was produced by the traditional Elonva protocol using additional rFSH (average 10.8 in the Engage study, 10.7 in the Ensure study), this could be perceived as a significant advantage since it will likely result in a significant reduction in OHSS risk, a perceived problem with the traditional Elonva protocol. If we assume a 70% fertilization rate and that approximately half of all embryos are of good quality by day 4/5 of culture, the production of \> 3 mature oocytes should ensure the generation of at least one good quality embryo for transfer with a good chance of pregnancy. This type of low impact stimulation is likely to be very popular in Europe and Australia where clinicians already accept the benefits of mild COS.
In summary, if we are able to provide evidence in this pilot study that a single injection of Elonva can result in the majority of women reaching oocyte retrieval with the production of at least 3 mature oocytes, while giving good fresh embryo transfer pregnancy rates and no OHSS, the coasting Elonva protocol may become a significant clinical protocol for low impact COS in the future.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
corifollitrophin alfa
corifollitrophin alfa used as COH stimulant in IVF
corifollitrophin alfa
use of a single dose of corifollitrophin alfa to provide adequate controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
corifollitrophin alfa
use of a single dose of corifollitrophin alfa to provide adequate controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF treatment
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Eligible for the use of the 150 mcg dose of Elonva according to Australian PBS requirements (weight \> 60 kg, antral follicle count \< 20)
* Intention of undergoing a fresh embryo transfer.
* No major sperm quality issues (ejaculate sperm concentration \> 5 million/ ml, motility \> 25% neat sample). ICSI for the indication of poor morphology would be acceptable for trial enrollment.
* Maternal age 18-37 years inclusive.
Exclusion Criteria
* Ovarian pathology (PCOS, ovarian cyst, endometrioma, poor trans-vaginal ultrasound ovary access).
* 2 or more previous cycles of IVF (stimulated cycles) in which a live birth pregnancy did not result, or one prior stimulated cycle of IVF and 2 or more frozen embryo transfer cycles without a live birth outcome (possible implantation failure).
* Significant pelvic pathology likely to impair embryo implantation (fibroids, polyps, uterine septum, hydrosalpinx).
* Intention to freeze all embryos with nil fresh transfer (pre-implantation genetic screening, oncology fertility preservation).
* Known renal impairment
* Use of a long down regulation or "flare" IVF protocol.
18 Years
37 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Flinders University
OTHER
Flinders Fertility
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Professor Kelton Tremellen
Professor of Reproductive Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kelton Tremellen, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Flinders University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Flinders Fertility
Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AU/1/2 C8B110
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.