Using a Systematic Review in Clinical Decision Making: a Pilot Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT02414360

Last Updated: 2015-04-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of running a full-scale trial that compares two formats of a shortened systematic review to a full-length systematic review to be used in clinical decision-making.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Two shortened systematic review formats were developed to enhance their use in clinical decision making. An online randomized controlled trial is planned to make comparisons of the shortened formats to a full-length systematic review. To prepare for the full-scale trial, a pilot study will be conducted to test methods and procedures in order to refine the processes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Evidence-Based Medicine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Shortened Format

Shortened format of a systematic review

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Shortened Format

Intervention Type OTHER

Shortened format of a systematic review

Control

Full length systematic review

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Full Length

Intervention Type OTHER

Full length systematic review

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Shortened Format

Shortened format of a systematic review

Intervention Type OTHER

Full Length

Full length systematic review

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Physicians who were in practice full- or part-time at study enrollment were recruited for participation
* Participants had to have access to the Internet as the study was conducted online.

Exclusion Criteria

* The systematic reviews in all formats were only available in English, thus any participants who were not able to read and understand English were not eligible to participate.
* Anyone who had taken part in any phase of the development of the shortened versions of the systematic reviews (cased-based or evidence-expertise formats) were not eligible for recruitment.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Laure Perrier

PhD Candidate

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perrier L, Persaud N, Ko A, Kastner M, Grimshaw J, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Development of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians. Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 14;8:68. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-68.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23767771 (View on PubMed)

Perrier L, Kealey MR, Straus SE. An iterative evaluation of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians: a focus group study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct;21(e2):e341-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002660. Epub 2014 May 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24786378 (View on PubMed)

Perrier L, Kealey MR, Straus SE. A usability study of two formats of a shortened systematic review for clinicians. BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 23;4(12):e005919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005919.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25537782 (View on PubMed)

Perrier L, Persaud N, Thorpe KE, Straus SE. Using a systematic review in clinical decision making: a pilot parallel, randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 15;10:118. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0303-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26276278 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

487776

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.