Effect of Executive Dysfunction on Rehabilitation Potential
NCT ID: NCT02411734
Last Updated: 2016-05-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
21 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-04-30
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rehabilitation Team Functioning and Patient Outcomes
NCT00237757
Coordination of Hemiparetic Movement After Post-Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT00013481
Stroke Rehabilitation, Functional Recovery, and Cost-effectiveness
NCT04279977
Activity Levels and Rehabilitation Outcomes of Patients Post-stroke
NCT03257111
Nurse-led Rehabilitation to Improve Self-care Among Stroke Patients in Bangladesh
NCT06786559
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Background: Executive function is a set of mental processes that helps connect past experience with present action. People use it to perform activities such as planning, organizing, strategizing, paying attention to and remembering details, and managing time and space. Executive function was the most important factor for level of care elderly individuals required (Royall, Chiodo, \& Polk, 2005). This study also found that many elderly individuals have impaired executive function even though they have normal cognitive function. Executive function is also related to functional abilities in individuals with mild dementia (Martyr \& Clare, 2012).
3. The research question: The hypothesis tested in this study is that rehabilitation potential is decreased in persons with impaired executive function. The purpose of this study is to attempt development of a screening tool that could be used before the patients are admitted for rehabilitation. Results of this screening would alert the rehabilitation facility about possible problems occurring after the patient is admitted for rehabilitation. If such a testing will show that patient's executive function is impaired, rehabilitation results may be improved by treatment of this impairment (Royall et al., 2009).
4. Study design: During admission of a patient, Dennise Fernandez will ask patients to state why they need rehabilitation. If they are able to state the reason, Dennise Fernandez will explained the study to them and if the patient is interested she will give him/her the Informed Consent Form. If the patient will be unable to state the reason for rehabilitation, the study will be explained to his/her proxy and informed consent given to the proxy. The patient/proxy will have time to read the Informed Consent on his/her own and ask any questions he/she may have. It the patient/proxy signs the Informed Consent, Dennise Fernandez will ask how old the patient is and the patient will be asked to complete the Trail Making Tests.
Both parts of the Trail Making Test consist of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. In Part A, the circles are numbered 1 - 25, and the patient should draw lines to connect the numbers in ascending order. In Part B, the circles include both numbers (1 - 13) and letters (A - L); as in Part A, the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern, but with the added task of alternating between the numbers and letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3-C, etc.). The patient should be instructed to connect the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting the pen or pencil from the paper. Time the patient as he or she connects the "trail." If the patient makes an error, point it out immediately and allow the patient to correct it. Errors affect the patient's score only in that the correction of errors is included in the completion time for the task. It is unnecessary to continue the test if the patient has not completed both parts after five minutes have elapsed.
Step 1: Give the patient a copy of the Trail Making Test Part A worksheet and a pen or pencil. Step 2: Demonstrate the test to the patient using the sample sheet (Trail Making Part A - SAMPLE). Step 3: Time the patient as he or she follows the "trail" made by the numbers on the test.
Step 4: Record the time. Step 5: Repeat the procedure for Trail Making Test Part B.
Scoring:
Results for both TMT A and B are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment. The patient will participate in therapy during their stay, with their participation evaluated by a) amount of time participating in therapy each day, b) need for encouragement by staff to participate. Encouragement will be rated on four point scale: i) no encouragement, ii) minimal encouragement, iii) moderate encouragement, iv) maximum encouragement. 72 hours prior to discharge, they will be asked by Dennise Fernandez to complete again Trail Making Tests.
5. Sample size: 100 patients
6. Study population: All admitted patients who will meet inclusion criteria will be approached until 100 of them signs the Informed Consent Form.
Inclusion criteria:
1. Admitted for rehabilitation
2. 65 years old or older
3. Speaks English
Exclusion criteria:
1. Unable to read (even with glasses)
2. Unable to write
7. The expected results of the research: Results of this study will be published in a scientific journal. If the results are positive, a scale will be developed that will inform rehabilitation facility about rehabilitation potential of a patient before he/she is admitted for rehabilitation.
8. Principal Investigator: Ladislav Volicer, MD, PhD
9. Potential risk to the subjects: The research will not influence rehabilitation of the patients. The only risk is that they may become frustrated if they difficulty accomplishing the Trail Making Tests.
10. Experimental Procedures: Administration of the Trail Making Tests and recording duration of rehabilitation and possible need for encouragement. Results of Trail Making Test with be correlated with level of participation in therapy.
11. Potential benefit to subjects: None
12. Human subjects considerations: Informed consent will be given to patients only after they express interest in research and they will have one day to decide if they want to sign it. If a patient cannot explain the reason for his/rehabilitation, the study will be explained to his/her proxy and the proxy will receive the informed consent form. Each patient will receive a PIN and all research protocols will be identified only with this PIN. The master list connecting PINs and names will be kept by the rehabilitation facility employee, Dennise Fernandez.
13. The study does not have greater than minimal risk.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation after hospitalization
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
60 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of South Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro 00018268
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.