Study of Narrow Band Imaging in the Characterization of Serrated Lesions
NCT ID: NCT02406547
Last Updated: 2016-05-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-31
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Narrow Band Imaging in the Characterization of Residual Neoplasia After Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection
NCT02448693
Observation of Microvessels and Invasion in Early Colorectal Lesions by NBI
NCT02047188
Narrow Band Imaging Versus White Light for Colonoscopy Serrate Lesions Detection
NCT02876133
Narrow-Band Imaging Versus Standard White Light for the Detection of Serrated Lesions in the Proximal Colon
NCT01572428
Narrow Band Imaging Versus White Light for the Detection and Miss of Sessile Serrated Lesion
NCT05684328
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
According to the WHO, SPS is defined with one of the following criteria: (1) at least 5 serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon, 2 of which are greater than 10 mm in diameter; (2) any number of serrated polyps occurring proximal to the sigmoid colon in an individual who has a first-degree relative with serrated polyposis; or (3) more than 20 serrated polyps of any size distributed throughout the colon. Therefore, patients with SPS are considered to be at increased risk of CRC. Considering the substantial risk of polyp recurrence, it is mandatory to follow up an annual surveillance.
Narrow-Band Imaging (NBI, Olympus) selectively uses certain wavelengths of the visible light leading to a shift in the excitation spectrum towards blue light. Blood vessels will appear dark, allowing an improved visibility and identification of the surface and vascular structures. In contrast to conventional chromoendoscopy, it is easily activated by pressing a button on the endoscope. A pilot study in patients with SPS showed significantly lower polyp miss rate with NBI compared with WLE. Furthermore, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has recently published the first Guideline of Advanced Endoscopic Imaging for the detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia and recommends conventional chromoendoscopy or NBI in patients with SPS (strong recommendation, low quality evidence).
The hypothesis is that NBI could improve the detection rate of serrated polyps compared with WLE in patients who do not accomplish the SPS criteria.
The investigators will perform a randomised, cross-over trial of tandem colonoscopy using NBI and WLE. The main goal is to compare the rate of detected polyps between both techniques and, if it is necessary, reassessing the diagnosis for an appropriate surveillance interval.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
WLE-NBI
Participants will be evaluated by same endoscopist, back-to-back tandem colonoscopy. It consists of two withdrawal from the cecum to sigmoid colon using firstly High Definition White Light Endoscopy (WLE) and secondly Narrow Band Imaging (NBI). All detected polyps will be classified macroscopically and resected in each withdrawal.
NBI
Withdrawal from cecum to sigmoid colon with Narrow Band Imaging (NBI, Evis Exera III, Olympus)
WLE
Withdrawal from cecum to sigmoid colon with High Definition White Light Endoscopy (WLE)
NBI-WLE
Participants will be evaluated by same endoscopist, back-to-back tandem colonoscopy. It consists of two withdrawal from the cecum to sigmoid colon using firstly Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) and secondly High Definition White Light Endoscopy (WLE). All detected polyps will be classified macroscopically and resected in each withdrawal.
NBI
Withdrawal from cecum to sigmoid colon with Narrow Band Imaging (NBI, Evis Exera III, Olympus)
WLE
Withdrawal from cecum to sigmoid colon with High Definition White Light Endoscopy (WLE)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NBI
Withdrawal from cecum to sigmoid colon with Narrow Band Imaging (NBI, Evis Exera III, Olympus)
WLE
Withdrawal from cecum to sigmoid colon with High Definition White Light Endoscopy (WLE)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a basal colonoscopy findings: ≥1 serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon, which are greater than ≥10mm in diameter; or ≥3 serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects with other types of histology polyps
* Subjects who neglect to follow-up
* Subjects who do not accept informed consent
* Subjects with high risk of perforation or complications due to sedation, including patients with comorbidities (ASA IV-V)
* Inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy (defined by Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS): ≤ 5 total points; or 0-1 points in any of the 3 segments of the colon)
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Parc de Salut Mar
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fausto Riu
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fausto Riu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Parc de Salut Mar
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Apr;49(6):1374-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Mar-Apr;64(2):104-17. doi: 10.3322/caac.21220. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701.
van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x.
Brown SR, Baraza W. Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;(10):CD006439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006439.pub3.
Kaminski MF, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Pohl J, Pellise M, Dekker E, Ignjatovic-Wilson A, Hoffman A, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Heresbach D, Dumonceau JM, East JE. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):435-49. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365348. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
Boparai KS, van den Broek FJ, van Eeden S, Fockens P, Dekker E. Increased polyp detection using narrow band imaging compared with high resolution endoscopy in patients with hyperplastic polyposis syndrome. Endoscopy. 2011 Aug;43(8):676-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256447. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
Leggett B, Whitehall V. Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(6):2088-100. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.066.
Riu Pons F, Andreu M, Naranjo D, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Seoane A, Dedeu JM, Barranco L, Bessa X. Narrow-band imaging and high-definition white-light endoscopy in patients with serrated lesions not fulfilling criteria for serrated polyposis syndrome: a randomized controlled trial with tandem colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01257-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CROMOSER
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.