Peer Empowerment Program for Physical Activity in Low Income and Minority Seniors
NCT ID: NCT02405325
Last Updated: 2021-07-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
476 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-31
2020-03-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Active You: Walk, Dance, and Tone Your Abs to Reduce Your Risk of Diabetes
NCT06127251
Active You: Feasibility of a Unique Physical Activity Program to Prevent Diabetes and Heart Disease
NCT04621045
MY PALS: A Community-Based Physical Activity Support Program for Older Adults
NCT00132288
Enhancing Capacity in Churches to Implement PA Programs
NCT05473871
A "Stand Up and Move More" Intervention for Older Adults
NCT03412084
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. The efficacy of PEP4PA (Peer Empowerment Program 4 Physical Activity) to reduce disparities in PA by increasing the percentage of participants achieving 150 minutes of PA per week at 6 and 12 months. Hypothesis: Participants in PEP4PA will significantly increase PA minutes in moderate intensity (measured objectively by accelerometry) to a greater extent than older adults receiving usual care (e.g. normal PA programing) in control centers and a greater percent will meet NHANES criteria for weekly PA.
2. The efficacy of PEP4PA to improve physical functioning, blood pressure (BP), depressive symptoms and quality of life. Hypothesis: Participants in PEP4PA will significantly increase their physical functioning (measured objectively by the short physical performance battery and 6 minute timed walk), decrease their systolic BP (mmHg) and reporting of depressive symptoms, and improve their quality of life scores (measured at baseline, 6 \& 12 months) to a greater extent than older adults in control centers.
3. Assess the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of PEP4PA in terms of cost per MET hour and cost per QALY compared to usual programming in the control centers at 12 months.
4. Evaluate the impact of PEP4PA on secondary outcomes such as sedentary time and sleep quality (measured by accelerometry), cognitive/executive functioning, and walking routes (from GPS) at 12 months.
Exploratory aims: 5. Examine individual, interpersonal, organizational, and environmental factors that affect implementation \& behavior change. 6. Assess the efficacy, effectiveness and ICER of PEP4PA at 24 months
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Physical Activity
The program will be run by peer Leaders and senior center staff with the support of UCSD staff. Participants will work towards a 2000 increase in daily steps through self-paced incidental walking and peer led group walks.
Physical Activity
intervention activities will remain at the daily level, including using pedometers, having daily goals, attendance at Peer lead group walks and recognition of efforts through monthly celebrations and bi-weekly goal tracking with peer Health Coaches.
Usual Care
Measurement at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months only with a health related event at each time point.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physical Activity
intervention activities will remain at the daily level, including using pedometers, having daily goals, attendance at Peer lead group walks and recognition of efforts through monthly celebrations and bi-weekly goal tracking with peer Health Coaches.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* have not had a fall that resulted in a hospitalization in the past 12 months
* able to complete a 3 meter walking test within 30 seconds
* able to read and write in English
* able to walk without assistance from another person
* able to wear study devices and complete assessments
* able to complete written surveys without assistance
* able to attend regular study activities at the center
* able to provide written informed consent and complete a post consent comprehension assessment
* able to commit approximately 10 hours per week to study activities (peer Health Coach only)
* active for 20 minutes per day on at least 3 days per week (peer Health Coach only)
Exclusion Criteria
2. have had a fall that resulted in a hospitalization in the last 12 months,
3. cannot complete the walking test within 30 seconds,
4. are not able to read and write in English,
5. cannot walk without human assistance
6. unable to wear study devices and complete assessments,
7. unable to complete written surveys without assistance,
8. cannot regularly attend study activities at the center,
9. are not able to provide written informed consent,
10. do not adequately answer questions on the post consent test,
11. Participated in the Community of Mine research study (UCSD)
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Loki Natarajan
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rich P, Aarons GA, Takemoto M, Cardenas V, Crist K, Bolling K, Lewars B, Sweet CC, Natarajan L, Shi Y, Full KM, Johnson E, Rosenberg DE, Whitt-Glover M, Marcus B, Kerr J. Implementation-effectiveness trial of an ecological intervention for physical activity in ethnically diverse low income senior centers. BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4584-1.
Crist K, Full KM, Linke S, Tuz-Zahra F, Bolling K, Lewars B, Liu C, Shi Y, Rosenberg D, Jankowska M, Benmarhnia T, Natarajan L. Health effects and cost-effectiveness of a multilevel physical activity intervention in low-income older adults; results from the PEP4PA cluster randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Jun 27;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01309-w.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
150336
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.