Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
450 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-08-31
2018-01-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Palpatory and Preprocedural Ultrasound Guided Techniques on Performance of Spinal Anesthesia
NCT01865955
Automated UltraSound Software for Identification of Lumbar Vertebral Levels
NCT02982317
The Role of Ultrasonography in Labor in Predicting the Outcomes of Childbirth
NCT06806904
Does Ultrasound Help Junior Anesthesia Residents With Placement of Labor Analgesia in Pregnant Patients
NCT02747238
Influence of Lumbar Ultrasound on Resident Learning Curve for Lateral Labor Epidural Placement
NCT02826668
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Following 3 months of data collection, information regarding the documented intervertebral space versus the actual intervertebral space that the neuraxial anesthetic was administered will be provided to each anesthesiologist and resident. Following delivery of this information, an additional 3 months of data collection will be performed (the same as the first 3 months) to evaluate whether a practice change took place.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pre cohort group
Following 3 months of data collection (pre-cohort group), education regarding the documented intervertebral space versus the actual intervertebral space that the neuraxial anesthetic was administered will be provided to each anesthesiologist and resident. Following delivery of this information, an additional 3 months of data collection will be performed (post-cohort group) (the same as the first 3 months) to evaluate whether a practice change took place.
Education
Education
Post cohort group.
Following 3 months of data collection (pre-cohort group), education regarding the documented intervertebral space versus the actual intervertebral space that the neuraxial anesthetic was administered will be provided to each anesthesiologist and resident. Following delivery of this information, an additional 3 months of data collection will be performed (post-cohort group) (the same as the first 3 months) to evaluate whether a practice change took place.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Education
Education
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Barbara Scavone, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Chicago MEDICINE
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Chicago MEDICINE
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wallace DH, Currie JM, Gilstrap LC, Santos R. Indirect sonographic guidance for epidural anesthesia in obese pregnant patients. Reg Anesth. 1992 Jul-Aug;17(4):233-6.
Grau T, Bartusseck E, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study. Can J Anaesth. 2003 Dec;50(10):1047-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03018371.
Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2002 May;14(3):169-75. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00378-6.
Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000 Nov;55(11):1122-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01547-4.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB14-1556
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.