Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Novel Neurorehabilitation Approach for Cognitive Aging With HIV (NCT NCT02391311)
NCT ID: NCT02391311
Last Updated: 2017-05-15
Results Overview
Computerized and paper \& pencil processing speed measures were used to evaluate this outcome. The Letter and Pattern Comparison Tasks are traditional paper and pencil (SOP) measures. Specifically, they assess perceptual speed. In Letter Comparison subjects are shown three sets of 32 pairs of letters containing 3, 6, or 9 segments. The participants are instructed to decide whether the patterns between the pairs are the same or different within each set, with a time limit of 20 sec per set. Pattern Comparison also presents three sets of 32 pairs of patterns with 3, 6, or 9 line segments. Similarly, participants are instructed to decide whether the patterns are the same or different within the 20 sec time limit. For each measure, the total score is the number of correct answers from all three sets. Larger scores indicate better reasoning and cognitive functioning. In this study scores from Letter and Pattern Comparison were combined for a total Letter/Pattern Score.
COMPLETED
NA
42 participants
baseline, 6 week posttest
2017-05-15
Participant Flow
Protocol Open to Accrual: March 2015, Primary Completion Date: January 2016 and Study Completion Date: January 2016. Recruitment location: University of Alabama at Birmingham.
48 subjects were screened/eligible, however the phone screen did not include consenting. 42 showed up for baseline testing and were consented, thus 42 subjects were enrolled. 42 were randomized immediately after baseline testing, however 5 were either lost to followup or deemed ineligible after baseline testing. See below for further breakdown.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
|
Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
|
Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
deemed ineligible after baseline
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Novel Neurorehabilitation Approach for Cognitive Aging With HIV
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
n=16 Participants
Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
|
Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
n=17 Participants
Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
|
Total
n=33 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.63 years
n=5 Participants
|
56 years
n=7 Participants
|
55.82 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 week posttestPopulation: n=33 subjects were included in final analyses. Of the 37 that completed the study, 4 were deemed ineligible after they had completed the study due to confirmation with medical records they had conditions that may affect neurocognition (stroke and schizophrenia) although they self reported on the screen they did not have these conditions.
Computerized and paper \& pencil processing speed measures were used to evaluate this outcome. The Letter and Pattern Comparison Tasks are traditional paper and pencil (SOP) measures. Specifically, they assess perceptual speed. In Letter Comparison subjects are shown three sets of 32 pairs of letters containing 3, 6, or 9 segments. The participants are instructed to decide whether the patterns between the pairs are the same or different within each set, with a time limit of 20 sec per set. Pattern Comparison also presents three sets of 32 pairs of patterns with 3, 6, or 9 line segments. Similarly, participants are instructed to decide whether the patterns are the same or different within the 20 sec time limit. For each measure, the total score is the number of correct answers from all three sets. Larger scores indicate better reasoning and cognitive functioning. In this study scores from Letter and Pattern Comparison were combined for a total Letter/Pattern Score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
n=16 Participants
Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
|
Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
n=17 Participants
Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Processing of Speed
|
2.63 units on a scale
Interval -7.0 to 12.0
|
6.06 units on a scale
Interval -6.0 to 23.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 week posttestPopulation: While n=33 was the final sample used for the primary outcome analyses, n=30 was used for the secondary outcome as 3 subjects did not have available simulator data.
Driving Simulator Performance: Center lane crossings (a count of how many times an individual crosses the centerline during the entire simulator drive). A difference score was taken between time 2 and time 1 and compared between treatment groups (sham condition and tDCS condition). A negative difference score indicates that fewer center line crossings were made at time 2 than time 1, while positive difference scores indicate the opposite direction, and scores of 0 represent no change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
n=15 Participants
Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
|
Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
n=15 Participants
Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Driving Simulator Performance
|
1.867 Times crossing center lane
Interval -2.0 to 11.0
|
-1.800 Times crossing center lane
Interval -12.0 to 3.0
|
Adverse Events
Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place