Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis

NCT ID: NCT02373618

Last Updated: 2017-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-05-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research is to compare patient outcomes following treatment of plantar fasciitis with conventional physical therapy (stretching, strengthening, ultrasound, manual therapy, and cryotherapy) and conventional physical therapy plus dry needling. Physical therapists commonly use conventional physical therapy techniques and dry needling to treat plantar fasciitis, and this study is attempting to find out if the addition of dry needling to conventional physical therapy is more effective than conventional physical therapy alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with plantar fasciitis will be randomly assigned to receive 1-2 treatments per week for 4 weeks of either: (1) Dry Needling and conventional physical therapy, or the (2) Conventional physical therapy (stretching, strengthening, ultrasound, manual therapy, and cryotherapy)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Plantar Fasciitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental: DN and Conventional PT

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DN and conventional PT

Intervention Type OTHER

Dry needling to the foot and lower leg. Up to 8 sessions over 4 weeks. Also conventional PT including: ultrasound, stretching, strengthening, cryotherapy and manual therapy to the foot and lower leg.

Active Comparator: Conventional PT

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional PT

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional physical therapy includes ultrasound, strengthening, cryotherapy, and manual therapy up to 8 sessions over 4 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DN and conventional PT

Dry needling to the foot and lower leg. Up to 8 sessions over 4 weeks. Also conventional PT including: ultrasound, stretching, strengthening, cryotherapy and manual therapy to the foot and lower leg.

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional PT

Conventional physical therapy includes ultrasound, strengthening, cryotherapy, and manual therapy up to 8 sessions over 4 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Report of at least 3 months of heel pain
2. Patient has not had physical therapy, massage therapy, chiropractic treatment, or injections for plantar heel pain in the least 4 weeks.
3. Diagnosis of plantar heel pain with ALL of the following positive clinical signs:

* "First---step" pain upon weight bearing in the morning OR after sitting for a period of time
* Pain localized over the medial calcaneal tubercle
* Increased pain with extended walking OR standing \>15 minutes
4. Plantar heel pain greater than or equal to 2/10 (NPRS 0-10 Scale)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Report of red flags to manual physical therapy to include: hypertension, infection, diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, heart disease, stroke, chronic ischemia, edema, severe varicosities, tumor, metabolic disease, prolonged steroid use, fracture, RA, osteoporosis, severe vascular disease, malignancy, etc.
2. History of previous surgery to the tibia, fibula, ankle joint, or foot.
3. History of arthrosis or arthritis of the ankle and/or foot.
4. History of significant ankle and/or foot instability.
5. Two or more positive neurologic signs consistent with nerve root compression, including any two of the following:

* Muscle weakness involving a major lower extremity muscle group
* Diminished lower extremity patella or Achilles tendon reflexes
* Diminished / absent sensation in any lower extremity dermatome
6. Involvement in litigation or worker's compensation regarding their foot pain.
7. Any condition that might contraindicate the use of electro---needling
8. The patient is pregnant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James Dunning, DPT, MSc, FAAOMPT

DPT FAAOMPT

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Dunning, DPT FAAOMPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

American Academy of Manipulative Therapy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAMT0002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.