Translation of COPE for Publicly-Funded Home Care Clients and Their Families
NCT ID: NCT02365051
Last Updated: 2023-06-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
582 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-05-31
2019-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Care of Persons With Dementia in Their Environments (COPE) in Programs of All-Inclusive Care of the Elderly (PACE)
NCT04165213
Telephone Support for Dementia Caregivers
NCT00735800
3D Team Care for Cognitively Vulnerable Older Adults
NCT02945085
Project COPE:Managing Dementia at Home
NCT00259454
Supporting Family Caregivers With Technology for Dementia Home Care
NCT02483520
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This trial will randomly assign 290 CHCPE clients with dementia and their CGs to receive either COPE plus customary CHCPE services, or customary CHCPE services alone. The main study outcome measures are similar to those of the original COPE efficacy trial. To maximize the translational effort, this study also will: conduct a formal cost-benefit analysis to determine the potential economic benefit of adding COPE to customary CHCPE services; evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of COPE as a new CHCPE service; and establish an expert Translational Advisory Committee to help develop and guide COPE dissemination plans for implementation nationally.
Study aims for CHCPE clients:
Aim 1.1: Determine COPE effect on functional dependence 4 months after randomization (primary study endpoint).
Aim 1.2: Determine COPE effects on engagement in activities, quality of life, and NPS, 4 months after randomization.
Aim 1.3: Determine COPE effects on functional dependence, engagement in activities, quality of life, and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), 12 months after randomization.
We hypothesize that CHCPE clients receiving COPE will show greater reduction in functional dependence, greater engagement in activities, better quality of life, and fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms, compared to controls, 4 months and 12 months after randomization.
Study aims for CGs:
Aim 2.1: Determine COPE effect on perceived CG well-being 4 months after randomization.
Aim 2.2: Determine COPE effects on CG confidence in using dementia management strategies 4 months after randomization.
Aim 2.3: Determine COPE effects on CG perceived well-being, confidence in using activities, and ability to keep client at home, 12 months after randomization.
We hypothesize that COPE CGs will report improvement in all specified outcomes compared to controls, 4 and 12 months after randomization.
Translational study aims:
Aim 3.1: Determine the net financial benefit of COPE, accounting for COPE intervention costs, CHCPE usual care costs, nursing home costs, and other service costs, 4 months and 12 months after randomization. The 12 month cost-benefit analysis will test whether financial benefits of COPE accrue over a longer time horizon than the 4-month intervention period.
Aim 3.2: Determine the feasibility and acceptability of COPE implementation into the CHCPE from multiple stakeholder viewpoints, including CHCPE care managers and state Medicaid and public policy decision makers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
usual care
Older adults with dementia and their family caregivers receive all services for which they are eligible in the Connecticut Home Care Program for Elders.
No interventions assigned to this group
COPE plus usual care
Older adults with dementia and their family caregivers receive Usual care plus the intervention: Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments.
Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments
In-home visits by occupational therapist and advanced practice nurse.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments
In-home visits by occupational therapist and advanced practice nurse.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UConn Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fortinsky, Richard
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard H Fortinsky, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UConn Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UConn Center on Aging
Farmington, Connecticut, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fortinsky RH, Gitlin LN, Pizzi LT, Piersol CV, Grady J, Robison JT, Molony S. Translation of the Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments (COPE) intervention in a publicly-funded home care context: Rationale and research design. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Jul;49:155-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
Fortinsky RH, Gitlin LN, Pizzi LT, Piersol CV, Grady J, Robison JT, Molony S, Wakefield D. Effectiveness of the Care of Persons With Dementia in Their Environments Intervention When Embedded in a Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Service Program. Innov Aging. 2020 Oct 26;4(6):igaa053. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa053. eCollection 2020.
Pizzi LT, Jutkowitz E, Prioli KM, Lu EY, Babcock Z, McAbee-Sevick H, Wakefield DB, Robison J, Molony S, Piersol CV, Gitlin LN, Fortinsky RH. Cost-Benefit Analysis of the COPE Program for Persons Living With Dementia: Toward a Payment Model. Innov Aging. 2021 Oct 16;6(1):igab042. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab042. eCollection 2022.
Kellett K, Robison J, McAbee-Sevick H, Gitlin LN, Verrier Piersol C, Fortinsky RH. Implementing the Care of Persons With Dementia in Their Environments (COPE) Intervention in Community-Based Programs: Acceptability and Perceived Benefit From Care Managers' and Interventionists' Perspectives. Gerontologist. 2023 Jan 24;63(1):28-39. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac068.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-014-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.